diff options
author | Takashi Yano <takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp> | 2022-04-11 04:44:41 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Takashi Yano <takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp> | 2022-04-11 19:27:13 +0300 |
commit | b58b5a96601f9e7424e4cb21aa0b9b2915daa49c (patch) | |
tree | 2ded2e1ef3610275e4b48aa86cf71294872db3d3 /winsup/cygwin/fhandler_tty.cc | |
parent | 27f0913c17c216548b2f5eea79037ee90038f375 (diff) |
Cygwin: pty: Do not set internal handles in HPCON inheritable.
- The internal handles in HPCON should not be inheritable, however,
the current code duplicates them as inheritable when handing over
ownership of the pseudo console. This patch fixes the issue.
Addresses: https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2022-April/251222.html
Diffstat (limited to 'winsup/cygwin/fhandler_tty.cc')
-rw-r--r-- | winsup/cygwin/fhandler_tty.cc | 8 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/winsup/cygwin/fhandler_tty.cc b/winsup/cygwin/fhandler_tty.cc index c02dfb8ed..484bf55dc 100644 --- a/winsup/cygwin/fhandler_tty.cc +++ b/winsup/cygwin/fhandler_tty.cc @@ -2056,7 +2056,7 @@ fhandler_pty_common::resize_pseudo_console (struct winsize *ws) OpenProcess (PROCESS_DUP_HANDLE, FALSE, get_ttyp ()->nat_pipe_owner_pid); DuplicateHandle (pcon_owner, get_ttyp ()->h_pcon_write_pipe, GetCurrentProcess (), &hpcon_local.hWritePipe, - 0, TRUE, DUPLICATE_SAME_ACCESS); + 0, FALSE, DUPLICATE_SAME_ACCESS); acquire_attach_mutex (mutex_timeout); ResizePseudoConsole ((HPCON) &hpcon_local, size); release_attach_mutex (); @@ -3551,15 +3551,15 @@ fhandler_pty_slave::close_pseudoconsole (tty *ttyp, DWORD force_switch_to) DuplicateHandle (GetCurrentProcess (), ttyp->h_pcon_write_pipe, new_owner, &new_write_pipe, - 0, TRUE, DUPLICATE_SAME_ACCESS); + 0, FALSE, DUPLICATE_SAME_ACCESS); DuplicateHandle (GetCurrentProcess (), ttyp->h_pcon_condrv_reference, new_owner, &new_condrv_reference, - 0, TRUE, DUPLICATE_SAME_ACCESS); + 0, FALSE, DUPLICATE_SAME_ACCESS); DuplicateHandle (GetCurrentProcess (), ttyp->h_pcon_conhost_process, new_owner, &new_conhost_process, - 0, TRUE, DUPLICATE_SAME_ACCESS); + 0, FALSE, DUPLICATE_SAME_ACCESS); DuplicateHandle (GetCurrentProcess (), ttyp->h_pcon_in, new_owner, &new_pcon_in, 0, TRUE, DUPLICATE_SAME_ACCESS); |