From e0597baed57fa7a9dfaf6dff6d0fa120784d21ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sergey Sharybin Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 14:44:59 +0100 Subject: Remove Carve boolean We've got quite comprehensive BMesh based implementation, which is way easier for maintenance than abandoned Carve library. After all the time BMesh implementation was working on the same level of limitations about manifold meshes and touching edges than Carve. Is better to focus on maintaining one boolean implementation now. Reviewers: campbellbarton Reviewed By: campbellbarton Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D3050 --- extern/carve/patches/random.patch | 16 ---------------- 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 extern/carve/patches/random.patch (limited to 'extern/carve/patches/random.patch') diff --git a/extern/carve/patches/random.patch b/extern/carve/patches/random.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 36cc8d10430..00000000000 --- a/extern/carve/patches/random.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,16 +0,0 @@ -diff -r 9a85d733a43d lib/polyhedron.cpp ---- a/lib/polyhedron.cpp Tue Jun 24 11:15:23 2014 +1000 -+++ b/lib/polyhedron.cpp Thu Nov 13 17:36:06 2014 +0500 -@@ -36,7 +36,11 @@ - - #include - --#include BOOST_INCLUDE(random.hpp) -+#ifdef HAVE_BOOST_LIBRARY -+# include BOOST_INCLUDE(random.hpp) -+#else -+# include -+#endif - - namespace { - bool emb_test(carve::poly::Polyhedron *poly, -- cgit v1.2.3