From 16ed49b26ec3b181fd72b37bcbce0f96551bc939 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Julian Eisel Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 16:46:20 +0200 Subject: UI Messages: Consistent spelling of term "data-block" Was using a bunch of different spellings, mostly "data-block" though, so went with that one (would have been my #1 choice anyway ;) ) --- source/blender/editors/space_action/action_data.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'source/blender/editors/space_action') diff --git a/source/blender/editors/space_action/action_data.c b/source/blender/editors/space_action/action_data.c index 6755a6316cc..fdf2dfe8371 100644 --- a/source/blender/editors/space_action/action_data.c +++ b/source/blender/editors/space_action/action_data.c @@ -669,8 +669,8 @@ void ACTION_OT_unlink(wmOperatorType *ot) ot->poll = action_unlink_poll; /* properties */ - prop = RNA_def_boolean(ot->srna, "force_delete", false, "Force Delete", - "Clear Fake User and remove copy stashed in this datablock's NLA stack"); + prop = RNA_def_boolean(ot->srna, "force_delete", false, "Force Delete", "Clear Fake User and remove " + "copy stashed in this data-block's NLA stack"); RNA_def_property_flag(prop, PROP_SKIP_SAVE); } -- cgit v1.2.3