From 39a68b27b90e4dc85e9eb69364bb81fad8e36337 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sergey Sharybin Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 12:11:31 +0200 Subject: Depsgraph: More clear function name for transform dependnecy The name was confusing to a level that it sounded like the relation goes the opposite direction than it is intended. --- source/blender/modifiers/intern/MOD_meshdeform.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'source/blender/modifiers/intern/MOD_meshdeform.c') diff --git a/source/blender/modifiers/intern/MOD_meshdeform.c b/source/blender/modifiers/intern/MOD_meshdeform.c index 334f5d75279..3b7e62f99e1 100644 --- a/source/blender/modifiers/intern/MOD_meshdeform.c +++ b/source/blender/modifiers/intern/MOD_meshdeform.c @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static void updateDepsgraph(ModifierData *md, const ModifierUpdateDepsgraphConte DEG_add_object_relation(ctx->node, mmd->object, DEG_OB_COMP_GEOMETRY, "Mesh Deform Modifier"); } /* We need own transformation as well. */ - DEG_add_modifier_to_transform_relation(ctx->node, "Mesh Deform Modifier"); + DEG_add_depends_on_transform_relation(ctx->node, "Mesh Deform Modifier"); } static float meshdeform_dynamic_bind(MeshDeformModifierData *mmd, float (*dco)[3], float vec[3]) -- cgit v1.2.3