From 39a68b27b90e4dc85e9eb69364bb81fad8e36337 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sergey Sharybin Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 12:11:31 +0200 Subject: Depsgraph: More clear function name for transform dependnecy The name was confusing to a level that it sounded like the relation goes the opposite direction than it is intended. --- source/blender/modifiers/intern/MOD_shrinkwrap.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'source/blender/modifiers/intern/MOD_shrinkwrap.c') diff --git a/source/blender/modifiers/intern/MOD_shrinkwrap.c b/source/blender/modifiers/intern/MOD_shrinkwrap.c index be12dc6639b..1c4ef5698b4 100644 --- a/source/blender/modifiers/intern/MOD_shrinkwrap.c +++ b/source/blender/modifiers/intern/MOD_shrinkwrap.c @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static void updateDepsgraph(ModifierData *md, const ModifierUpdateDepsgraphConte DEG_add_special_eval_flag(ctx->node, &smd->auxTarget->id, DAG_EVAL_NEED_SHRINKWRAP_BOUNDARY); } } - DEG_add_modifier_to_transform_relation(ctx->node, "Shrinkwrap Modifier"); + DEG_add_depends_on_transform_relation(ctx->node, "Shrinkwrap Modifier"); } static bool dependsOnNormals(ModifierData *md) -- cgit v1.2.3