From 5d79f9f276b4b3e6289308c534c58e7ee3bb5e2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jacques Lucke Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2020 16:30:26 +0200 Subject: BLI: refactor how buffers for small object optimization are stored --- tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_array_test.cc | 11 +++++------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'tests') diff --git a/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_array_test.cc b/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_array_test.cc index 9c77c69e296..b65402cd1fd 100644 --- a/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_array_test.cc +++ b/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_array_test.cc @@ -138,23 +138,22 @@ TEST(array, NoInitializationSizeConstructor) { using MyArray = Array; - AlignedBuffer buffer; - char *buffer_ptr = (char *)buffer.ptr(); - memset(buffer_ptr, 100, sizeof(MyArray)); + TypedBuffer buffer; + memset(buffer, 100, sizeof(MyArray)); /* Doing this to avoid some compiler optimization. */ for (uint i : IndexRange(sizeof(MyArray))) { - EXPECT_EQ(buffer_ptr[i], 100); + EXPECT_EQ(((char *)buffer.ptr())[i], 100); } { - MyArray &array = *new (buffer.ptr()) MyArray(1, NoInitialization()); + MyArray &array = *new (buffer) MyArray(1, NoInitialization()); EXPECT_EQ(array[0].value, 100); array.clear_without_destruct(); array.~Array(); } { - MyArray &array = *new (buffer.ptr()) MyArray(1); + MyArray &array = *new (buffer) MyArray(1); EXPECT_EQ(array[0].value, 42); array.~Array(); } -- cgit v1.2.3