diff options
author | Jeff King <peff@peff.net> | 2015-09-03 11:24:09 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | 2015-09-04 01:18:12 +0300 |
commit | 1c9b659d9837fa2bd6ab21edaae94d19c20ac216 (patch) | |
tree | e93fd6cd3682f1b4f74abd201adc55e8048f571b /Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt | |
parent | 16ffa6443e279a9b3b63d7a2bebeb07833506010 (diff) |
pack-protocol: clarify LF-handling in PKT-LINE()
The spec is very inconsistent about which PKT-LINE() parts
of the grammar include a LF. On top of that, the code is not
consistent, either (e.g., send-pack does not put newlines
into the ref-update commands it sends).
Let's make explicit the long-standing expectation that we
generally expect pkt-lines to end in a newline, but that
receivers should be lenient. This makes the spec consistent,
and matches what git already does (though it does not always
fulfill the SHOULD).
We do make an exception for the push-cert, where the
receiving code is currently a bit pickier. This is a
reasonable way to be, as the data needs to be byte-for-byte
compatible with what was signed. We _could_ make up some
rules about signing a canonicalized version including
newlines, but that would require a code change, and is out
of scope for this patch.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt | 46 |
1 files changed, 26 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt b/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt index 4064fc796f..c6977bbc5a 100644 --- a/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt +++ b/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt @@ -14,6 +14,14 @@ data. The protocol functions to have a server tell a client what is currently on the server, then for the two to negotiate the smallest amount of data to send in order to fully update one or the other. +pkt-line Format +--------------- + +The descriptions below build on the pkt-line format described in +protocol-common.txt. When the grammar indicate `PKT-LINE(...)`, unless +otherwise noted the usual pkt-line LF rules apply: the sender SHOULD +include a LF, but the receiver MUST NOT complain if it is not present. + Transports ---------- There are three transports over which the packfile protocol is @@ -143,9 +151,6 @@ with the object name that each reference currently points to. 003fe92df48743b7bc7d26bcaabfddde0a1e20cae47c refs/tags/v1.0^{} 0000 -Server SHOULD terminate each non-flush line using LF ("\n") terminator; -client MUST NOT complain if there is no terminator. - The returned response is a pkt-line stream describing each ref and its current value. The stream MUST be sorted by name according to the C locale ordering. @@ -165,15 +170,15 @@ MUST peel the ref if it's an annotated tag. flush-pkt no-refs = PKT-LINE(zero-id SP "capabilities^{}" - NUL capability-list LF) + NUL capability-list) list-of-refs = first-ref *other-ref first-ref = PKT-LINE(obj-id SP refname - NUL capability-list LF) + NUL capability-list) other-ref = PKT-LINE(other-tip / other-peeled) - other-tip = obj-id SP refname LF - other-peeled = obj-id SP refname "^{}" LF + other-tip = obj-id SP refname + other-peeled = obj-id SP refname "^{}" shallow = PKT-LINE("shallow" SP obj-id) @@ -216,8 +221,8 @@ out of what the server said it could do with the first 'want' line. depth-request = PKT-LINE("deepen" SP depth) - first-want = PKT-LINE("want" SP obj-id SP capability-list LF) - additional-want = PKT-LINE("want" SP obj-id LF) + first-want = PKT-LINE("want" SP obj-id SP capability-list) + additional-want = PKT-LINE("want" SP obj-id) depth = 1*DIGIT ---- @@ -284,7 +289,7 @@ so that there is always a block of 32 "in-flight on the wire" at a time. compute-end have-list = *have-line - have-line = PKT-LINE("have" SP obj-id LF) + have-line = PKT-LINE("have" SP obj-id) compute-end = flush-pkt / PKT-LINE("done") ---- @@ -348,10 +353,10 @@ Then the server will start sending its packfile data. ---- server-response = *ack_multi ack / nak - ack_multi = PKT-LINE("ACK" SP obj-id ack_status LF) + ack_multi = PKT-LINE("ACK" SP obj-id ack_status) ack_status = "continue" / "common" / "ready" - ack = PKT-LINE("ACK SP obj-id LF) - nak = PKT-LINE("NAK" LF) + ack = PKT-LINE("ACK" SP obj-id) + nak = PKT-LINE("NAK") ---- A simple clone may look like this (with no 'have' lines): @@ -467,10 +472,10 @@ references. ---- update-request = *shallow ( command-list | push-cert ) [packfile] - shallow = PKT-LINE("shallow" SP obj-id LF) + shallow = PKT-LINE("shallow" SP obj-id) - command-list = PKT-LINE(command NUL capability-list LF) - *PKT-LINE(command LF) + command-list = PKT-LINE(command NUL capability-list) + *PKT-LINE(command) flush-pkt command = create / delete / update @@ -521,7 +526,8 @@ Push Certificate A push certificate begins with a set of header lines. After the header and an empty line, the protocol commands follow, one per -line. +line. Note that the the trailing LF in push-cert PKT-LINEs is _not_ +optional; it must be present. Currently, the following header fields are defined: @@ -560,12 +566,12 @@ update was successful, or 'ng [refname] [error]' if the update was not. 1*(command-status) flush-pkt - unpack-status = PKT-LINE("unpack" SP unpack-result LF) + unpack-status = PKT-LINE("unpack" SP unpack-result) unpack-result = "ok" / error-msg command-status = command-ok / command-fail - command-ok = PKT-LINE("ok" SP refname LF) - command-fail = PKT-LINE("ng" SP refname SP error-msg LF) + command-ok = PKT-LINE("ok" SP refname) + command-fail = PKT-LINE("ng" SP refname SP error-msg) error-msg = 1*(OCTECT) ; where not "ok" ---- |