diff options
author | Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> | 2007-05-20 11:19:30 +0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> | 2007-05-20 11:19:30 +0400 |
commit | 03f6db0ec058ca1d34672a3100293c3bf56c3b6b (patch) | |
tree | 38949f1dc69f9423ea74e99381ce6083d740540a /Documentation/user-manual.txt | |
parent | 404fdef22f1084141aeef5781d5a322554fed481 (diff) | |
parent | f7b47b273ed2c9e9b298c4f5dd02884b46dfbced (diff) |
Merge branch 'maint' to synchronize with 1.5.1.6
* maint:
GIT 1.5.1.6
git-svn: don't minimize-url when doing an init that tracks multiple paths
git-svn: avoid crashing svnserve when creating new directories
user-manual: Add section on ignoring files
user-manual: finding commits referencing given file content
user-manual: discourage shared repository
tutorial: revise index introduction
tutorials: add user-manual links
Conflicts:
GIT-VERSION-GEN
RelNotes
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/user-manual.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/user-manual.txt | 108 |
1 files changed, 106 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/user-manual.txt b/Documentation/user-manual.txt index c4bff474dd..52247aa713 100644 --- a/Documentation/user-manual.txt +++ b/Documentation/user-manual.txt @@ -921,6 +921,22 @@ echo "git diff --stat --summary -M v$last v$new > ../diffstat-$new" and then he just cut-and-pastes the output commands after verifying that they look OK. +Finding commits referencing a file with given content +----------------------------------------------------- + +Somebody hands you a copy of a file, and asks which commits modified a +file such that it contained the given content either before or after the +commit. You can find out with this: + +------------------------------------------------- +$ git log --raw -r --abbrev=40 --pretty=oneline -- filename | + grep -B 1 `git hash-object filename` +------------------------------------------------- + +Figuring out why this works is left as an exercise to the (advanced) +student. The gitlink:git-log[1], gitlink:git-diff-tree[1], and +gitlink:git-hash-object[1] man pages may prove helpful. + [[Developing-with-git]] Developing with git =================== @@ -1073,6 +1089,75 @@ description. Tools that turn commits into email, for example, use the first line on the Subject line and the rest of the commit in the body. +[[ignoring-files]] +Ignoring files +-------------- + +A project will often generate files that you do 'not' want to track with git. +This typically includes files generated by a build process or temporary +backup files made by your editor. Of course, 'not' tracking files with git +is just a matter of 'not' calling "`git add`" on them. But it quickly becomes +annoying to have these untracked files lying around; e.g. they make +"`git add .`" and "`git commit -a`" practically useless, and they keep +showing up in the output of "`git status`", etc. + +Git therefore provides "exclude patterns" for telling git which files to +actively ignore. Exclude patterns are thoroughly explained in the +"Exclude Patterns" section of the gitlink:git-ls-files[1] manual page, +but the heart of the concept is simply a list of files which git should +ignore. Entries in the list may contain globs to specify multiple files, +or may be prefixed by "`!`" to explicitly include (un-ignore) a previously +excluded (ignored) file (i.e. later exclude patterns override earlier ones). +The following example should illustrate such patterns: + +------------------------------------------------- +# Lines starting with '#' are considered comments. +# Ignore foo.txt. +foo.txt +# Ignore (generated) html files, +*.html +# except foo.html which is maintained by hand. +!foo.html +# Ignore objects and archives. +*.[oa] +------------------------------------------------- + +The next question is where to put these exclude patterns so that git can +find them. Git looks for exclude patterns in the following files: + +`.gitignore` files in your working tree::: + You may store multiple `.gitignore` files at various locations in your + working tree. Each `.gitignore` file is applied to the directory where + it's located, including its subdirectories. Furthermore, the + `.gitignore` files can be tracked like any other files in your working + tree; just do a "`git add .gitignore`" and commit. `.gitignore` is + therefore the right place to put exclude patterns that are meant to + be shared between all project participants, such as build output files + (e.g. `\*.o`), etc. +`.git/info/exclude` in your repo::: + Exclude patterns in this file are applied to the working tree as a + whole. Since the file is not located in your working tree, it does + not follow push/pull/clone like `.gitignore` can do. This is therefore + the place to put exclude patterns that are local to your copy of the + repo (i.e. 'not' shared between project participants), such as + temporary backup files made by your editor (e.g. `\*~`), etc. +The file specified by the `core.excludesfile` config directive::: + By setting the `core.excludesfile` config directive you can tell git + where to find more exclude patterns (see gitlink:git-config[1] for + more information on configuration options). This config directive + can be set in the per-repo `.git/config` file, in which case the + exclude patterns will apply to that repo only. Alternatively, you + can set the directive in the global `~/.gitconfig` file to apply + the exclude pattern to all your git repos. As with the above + `.git/info/exclude` (and, indeed, with git config directives in + general), this directive does not follow push/pull/clone, but remain + local to your repo(s). + +[NOTE] +In addition to the above alternatives, there are git commands that can take +exclude patterns directly on the command line. See gitlink:git-ls-files[1] +for an example of this. + [[how-to-merge]] How to merge ------------ @@ -1857,6 +1942,27 @@ all push to and pull from a single shared repository. See link:cvs-migration.html[git for CVS users] for instructions on how to set this up. +However, while there is nothing wrong with git's support for shared +repositories, this mode of operation is not generally recommended, +simply because the mode of collaboration that git supports--by +exchanging patches and pulling from public repositories--has so many +advantages over the central shared repository: + + - Git's ability to quickly import and merge patches allows a + single maintainer to process incoming changes even at very + high rates. And when that becomes too much, git-pull provides + an easy way for that maintainer to delegate this job to other + maintainers while still allowing optional review of incoming + changes. + - Since every developer's repository has the same complete copy + of the project history, no repository is special, and it is + trivial for another developer to take over maintenance of a + project, either by mutual agreement, or because a maintainer + becomes unresponsive or difficult to work with. + - The lack of a central group of "committers" means there is + less need for formal decisions about who is "in" and who is + "out". + [[setting-up-gitweb]] Allowing web browsing of a repository ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ @@ -3816,8 +3922,6 @@ Think about how to create a clear chapter dependency graph that will allow people to get to important topics without necessarily reading everything in between. -Say something about .gitignore. - Scan Documentation/ for other stuff left out; in particular: howto's some of technical/? |