Welcome to mirror list, hosted at ThFree Co, Russian Federation.

git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git - Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.
summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>2017-03-24 21:40:57 +0300
committerJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2017-03-24 22:15:26 +0300
commitac3f5a346860b824e083c5d305757c3260565475 (patch)
treeb1dfdaaf848507f24dbd84a17936da3482975819 /builtin/branch.c
parent1e0c3b680c6e7b37fc51bd69a410af01897a4f94 (diff)
ref-filter: add --no-contains option to tag/branch/for-each-ref
Change the tag, branch & for-each-ref commands to have a --no-contains option in addition to their longstanding --contains options. This allows for finding the last-good rollout tag given a known-bad <commit>. Given a hypothetically bad commit cf5c7253e0, the git version to revert to can be found with this hacky two-liner: (git tag -l 'v[0-9]*'; git tag -l --contains cf5c7253e0 'v[0-9]*') | sort | uniq -c | grep -E '^ *1 ' | awk '{print $2}' | tail -n 10 With this new --no-contains option the same can be achieved with: git tag -l --no-contains cf5c7253e0 'v[0-9]*' | sort | tail -n 10 As the filtering machinery is shared between the tag, branch & for-each-ref commands, implement this for those commands too. A practical use for this with "branch" is e.g. finding branches which were branched off between v2.8.0 and v2.10.0: git branch --contains v2.8.0 --no-contains v2.10.0 The "describe" command also has a --contains option, but its semantics are unrelated to what tag/branch/for-each-ref use --contains for. A --no-contains option for "describe" wouldn't make any sense, other than being exactly equivalent to not supplying --contains at all, which would be confusing at best. Add a --without option to "tag" as an alias for --no-contains, for consistency with --with and --contains. The --with option is undocumented, and possibly the only user of it is Junio (<xmqqefy71iej.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>). But it's trivial to support, so let's do that. The additions to the the test suite are inverse copies of the corresponding --contains tests. With this change --no-contains for tag, branch & for-each-ref is just as well tested as the existing --contains option. In addition to those tests, add a test for "tag" which asserts that --no-contains won't find tree/blob tags, which is slightly unintuitive, but consistent with how --contains works & is documented. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'builtin/branch.c')
-rw-r--r--builtin/branch.c5
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/builtin/branch.c b/builtin/branch.c
index 94f7de7fa5..5e7c8d4665 100644
--- a/builtin/branch.c
+++ b/builtin/branch.c
@@ -548,7 +548,9 @@ int cmd_branch(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
OPT_SET_INT('r', "remotes", &filter.kind, N_("act on remote-tracking branches"),
FILTER_REFS_REMOTES),
OPT_CONTAINS(&filter.with_commit, N_("print only branches that contain the commit")),
+ OPT_NO_CONTAINS(&filter.no_commit, N_("print only branches that don't contain the commit")),
OPT_WITH(&filter.with_commit, N_("print only branches that contain the commit")),
+ OPT_WITHOUT(&filter.no_commit, N_("print only branches that don't contain the commit")),
OPT__ABBREV(&filter.abbrev),
OPT_GROUP(N_("Specific git-branch actions:")),
@@ -604,7 +606,8 @@ int cmd_branch(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
if (!delete && !rename && !edit_description && !new_upstream && !unset_upstream && argc == 0)
list = 1;
- if (filter.with_commit || filter.merge != REF_FILTER_MERGED_NONE || filter.points_at.nr)
+ if (filter.with_commit || filter.merge != REF_FILTER_MERGED_NONE || filter.points_at.nr ||
+ filter.no_commit)
list = 1;
if (!!delete + !!rename + !!new_upstream +