diff options
| author | Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> | 2020-04-08 21:52:33 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | 2020-04-08 22:17:58 +0300 |
| commit | 121c0d4151a602f528887486d627a7230abbd85d (patch) | |
| tree | 0bcf88d965b4b878d60f8ea209faaf943242673d /t/t3904-stash-patch.sh | |
| parent | 274b9cc25322d9ee79aa8e6d4e86f0ffe5ced925 (diff) | |
t3904: fix incorrect demonstration of a bug
In 7e9e048661 (stash -p: demonstrate failure of split with mixed y/n,
2015-04-16), a regression test for a known breakage that was added to
the test script `t3904-stash-patch.sh` that demonstrated that splitting
a hunk and trying to stash only part of that split hunk fails (but
shouldn't).
As expected, it still fails, but for the wrong reason: once the bug is
fixed, we would expect stderr to show nothing, yet the regression test
expects stderr to show something.
Let's fix that by telling that regression test case to expect nothing to
be printed to stderr.
While at it, also drop the obvious left-over from debugging where the
regression test did not mind `git stash -p` to return a non-zero exit
status.
Of course, the regression test still fails, but this time for the
correct reason.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 't/t3904-stash-patch.sh')
| -rwxr-xr-x | t/t3904-stash-patch.sh | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/t/t3904-stash-patch.sh b/t/t3904-stash-patch.sh index 9546b6f8a4..ab7d7aa6de 100755 --- a/t/t3904-stash-patch.sh +++ b/t/t3904-stash-patch.sh @@ -106,8 +106,8 @@ test_expect_failure 'stash -p with split hunk' ' ccc EOF printf "%s\n" s n y q | - test_might_fail git stash -p 2>error && - ! test_must_be_empty error && + git stash -p 2>error && + test_must_be_empty error && grep "added line 1" test && ! grep "added line 2" test ' |