| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
* np/fetch:
git-fetch: more terse fetch output
|
|
"-q" is the very first option described in the git-fetch manpage, and it
isn't supported.
Signed-off-by: Steven Grimm <koreth@midwinter.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
This makes the fetch output much more terse and prettier on a 80 column
display, based on a consensus reached on the mailing list. Here's an
example output:
Receiving objects: 100% (5439/5439), 1.60 MiB | 636 KiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (4604/4604), done.
From git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git
! [rejected] html -> origin/html (non fast forward)
136e631..f45e867 maint -> origin/maint (fast forward)
9850e2e..44dd7e0 man -> origin/man (fast forward)
3e4bb08..e3d6d56 master -> origin/master (fast forward)
fa3665c..536f64a next -> origin/next (fast forward)
+ 4f6d9d6...768326f pu -> origin/pu (forced update)
* [new branch] todo -> origin/todo
Some portions of this patch have been extracted from earlier proposals
by Jeff King and Shawn Pearce.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When the branch named with branch.$name.merge is not covered by
the fetch configuration for the remote repository named with
branch.$name.remote, we automatically add that branch to the set
of branches to be fetched. However, if the remote repository
does not have that branch (e.g. it used to exist, but got
removed), this is not a reason to fail the git-fetch itself.
The situation however will be noticed if git-fetch was called by
git-pull, as the resulting FETCH_HEAD would not have any entry
that is marked for merging.
Acked-By: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
This is the same bug as 42a32174b600f139b489341b1281fb1bfa14c252.
The warning "Object $X is a tree, not a commit" is bogus and is
not relevant here. If its not a commit we just need to make sure
we don't mark it for merge as we fill out FETCH_HEAD.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
|
|
When doing "git fetch <remote>" on a remote that does not have the
branch referenced in branch.<current-branch>.merge, git fetch failed.
It failed because it tried to add the "merge" ref to the refs to be
fetched.
Fix that. And add a test case.
Incidentally, this unconvered a bug in our own test suite, where
"git pull <some-path>" was expected to merge the ref given in the
defaults, even if not pulling from the default remote.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Lars Hjemli <hjemli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
|
|
If multiple refspecs matched the same ref, the update would be
processed multiple times. Now having the same destination for the same
source has no additional effect, and having the same destination for
different sources is an error.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Signed-off-by: Lars Hjemli <hjemli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
|
|
This adds a verbosity level below 0 for suppressing default messages
with --quiet, and makes the default for http be verbose instead of
quiet. This matches the behavior of the shell script version of git-fetch.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The config item for a refspec side and the ref name that it matches
aren't necessarily character-for-character identical. We actually want
to merge a ref by default if: there is no per-branch config, it is the
found result of looking for the match for the first refspec, and the
first refspec is not a pattern. Beyond that, anything that
get_fetch_map() thinks matches is fine.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Aside from reducing the code by 20 lines this refactoring removes
a level of indirection when trying to access the operations of a
given transport "instance", making the code clearer and easier to
follow.
It also has the nice effect of giving us the benefits of C99 style
struct initialization (namely ".fetch = X") without requiring that
level of language support from our compiler. We don't need to worry
about new operation methods being added as they will now be NULL'd
out automatically by the xcalloc() we use to create the new struct
transport we supply to the caller.
This pattern already exists in struct walker, so we already have
a precedent for it in Git. We also don't really need to worry
about any sort of performance decreases that may occur as a result
of filling out 4-8 op pointers when we make a "struct transport".
The extra few CPU cycles this requires over filling in the "struct
transport_ops" is killed by the time it will take Git to actually
*use* one of those functions, as most transport operations are
going over the wire or will be copying object data locally between
two directories.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Anyplace we talk about the address of a remote repository we always
refer to it as a URL, especially in the configuration file and
.git/remotes where we call it "remote.$n.url" or start the first
line with "URL:". Calling this value a uri within the internal C
code just doesn't jive well with our commonly accepted terms.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
If a transport doesn't support an option we already are telling
the higher level application (fetch or push) that the option is not
valid by sending back a >0 return value from transport_set_option
so there's not a strong motivation to have the function perform the
output itself. Instead we should let the higher level application
do the output if it is necessary. This avoids always telling the
user that depth isn't supported on HTTP urls even when they did
not pass a --depth option to git-fetch.
If the user passes an option and the option value is invalid we now
properly die in git-fetch instead of just spitting out a message
and running anyway. This mimics prior behavior better where
incorrect/malformed options are not accepted by the process.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
|
|
My prior bug fix for git-push titled "Don't configure remote "." to
fetch everything to itself" actually broke t5520 as we were unable
to evaluate a branch configuration of:
[branch "copy"]
remote = .
merge = refs/heads/master
as remote "." did not have a "remote...fetch" configuration entry to
offer up refs/heads/master as a possible candidate available to be
fetched and merged. In shell script git-fetch and prior to the above
mentioned commit this was hardcoded for a url of "." to be the set of
local branches.
Chasing down this bug led me to the conclusion that our prior behavior
with regards to branch.$name.merge was incorrect. In the shell script
based git-fetch implementation we only fetched and merged a branch if
it appeared both in branch.$name.merge *and* in remote.$r.fetch, where
$r = branch.$name.remote. In other words in the following config file:
[remote "origin"]
url = git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git
fetch = refs/heads/master:refs/remotes/origin/master
[branch "master"]
remote = origin
merge = refs/heads/master
[branch "pu"]
remote = origin
merge = refs/heads/pu
Attempting to run `git pull` while on branch "pu" would always give
the user "Already up-to-date" as git-fetch did not fetch pu and thus
did not mark it for merge in .git/FETCH_HEAD. The configured merge
would always be ignored and the user would be left scratching her
confused head wondering why merge did not work on "pu" but worked
fine on "master".
If we are using the "default fetch" specification for the current
branch and the current branch has a branch.$name.merge configured
we now union it with the list of refs in remote.$r.fetch. This
way the above configuration does what the user expects it to do,
which is to fetch only "master" by default but when on "pu" to
fetch both "master" and "pu".
This uncovered some breakage in the test suite where old-style Cogito
branches (.git/branches/$r) did not fetch the branches listed in
.git/config for merging and thus did not actually merge them if the
user tried to use `git pull` on that branch. Junio and I discussed
it on list and felt that the union approach here makes more sense to
DWIM for the end-user than silently ignoring their configured request
so the test vectors for t5515 have been updated to include for-merge
lines in .git/FETCH_HEAD where they have been configured for-merge
in .git/config.
Since we are now performing a union of the fetch specification and
the merge specification and we cannot allow a branch to be listed
twice (otherwise it comes out twice in .git/FETCH_HEAD) we need to
perform a double loop here over all of the branch.$name.merge lines
and try to set their merge flag if we have already schedule that
branch for fetching by remote.$r.fetch. If no match is found then
we must add new specifications to fetch the branch but not store it
as no local tracking branch has been designated.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
|
|
Older git-fetch.sh doesn't print "ref: X" when invoked as
`git fetch $url X" so we shouldn't do that now in the new
builtin version.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
If we are running fetch in a repository that has a detached HEAD
then there is no current_branch available. In such a case any ref
that the fetch might update by definition cannot also be the current
branch so we should always bypass the "don't update HEAD" test.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
We don't actually need to know at the time of transport_get if the
caller wants to fetch, push, or do both on the returned object.
It is easier to just delay the initialization of the HTTP walker
until we know we will need it by providing a CURL specific fetch
function in the curl_transport that makes sure the walker instance
is initialized before use.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
If we are using a native transport and the transport chose to
save the packfile it may have created a .keep file to protect
the packfile from a concurrently running git-repack process.
In such a case the git-fetch process should make sure it will
unlink the .keep file even if it fails to update any refs as
otherwise the newly downloaded packfile's diskspace will never
be reclaimed if the objects are not actually referenced.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
If we are using a native packfile to perform a git-fetch invocation
and the received packfile contained more than the configured limits
of fetch.unpackLimit/transfer.unpackLimit then index-pack will output
a single line saying "keep\t$sha1\n" to stdout. This line needs to
be captured and retained so we can delete the corresponding .keep
file ("$GIT_DIR/objects/pack/pack-$sha1.keep") once all refs have
been safely updated.
This trick has long been in use with git-fetch.sh and its lower level
helper git-fetch--tool as a way to allow index-pack to save the new
packfile before the refs have been updated and yet avoid a race with
any concurrently running git-repack process. It was unfortunately
lost when git-fetch.sh was converted to pure C and fetch--tool was
no longer being invoked.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Commit walkers need to know the SHA-1 name of any objects they
have been asked to fetch while the native pack transport only
wants to know the names of the remote refs as the remote side
must do the name->SHA-1 translation.
Since we only have three fetch implementations and one of them
(bundle) doesn't even need the name information we can reduce
the code required to perform a fetch by having just one function
and passing of the filtered list of refs to be fetched. Each
transport can then obtain the information it needs from that ref
array to construct its own internal operation state.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Conflicts:
transport.c
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Never referenced. This should actually be handled down inside
of builtin-fetch-pack, not up here in the generic user frontend.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The older git-fetch client did not produce all of this debugging
information to stdout. Most end-users and Porcelain (e.g. StGIT,
git-gui, qgit) do not want to see these low-level details on the
console so they should be removed.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
We are adding a space between each argument in the sprintf above
so we must account for this as we update our position within the
reflog message and append in any remaining arguments.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
If we are fetching to a local reference (the so called peer_ref) and
the refspec that created this ref/peer_ref association had started
with '+' we are supposed to allow a non-fast-forward update during
fetch, even if --force was not supplied on the command line. The
builtin-fetch implementation was not honoring this setting as it
was copied from the wrong struct ref instance.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Thanks to Johannes Schindelin for review and fixes, and Julian
Phillips for the original C translation.
This changes a few small bits of behavior:
branch.<name>.merge is parsed as if it were the lhs of a fetch
refspec, and does not have to exactly match the actual lhs of a
refspec, so long as it is a valid abbreviation for the same ref.
branch.<name>.merge is no longer ignored if the remote is configured
with a branches/* file. Neither behavior is useful, because there can
only be one ref that gets fetched, but this is more consistant.
Also, fetch prints different information to standard out.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
