Welcome to mirror list, hosted at ThFree Co, Russian Federation.

git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git - Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.
summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-02-11Merge branch 'jk/use-oid-pos'Junio C Hamano
Code clean-up to ensure our use of hashtables using object names as keys use the "struct object_id" objects, not the raw hash values. * jk/use-oid-pos: oid_pos(): access table through const pointers hash_pos(): convert to oid_pos() rerere: use strmap to store rerere directories rerere: tighten rr-cache dirname check rerere: check dirname format while iterating rr_cache directory commit_graft_pos(): take an oid instead of a bare hash
2021-02-04Merge branch 'jk/peel-iterated-oid'Junio C Hamano
The peel_ref() API has been replaced with peel_iterated_oid(). * jk/peel-iterated-oid: refs: switch peel_ref() to peel_iterated_oid()
2021-01-28oid_pos(): access table through const pointersJeff King
When we are looking up an oid in an array, we obviously don't need to write to the array. Let's mark it as const in the function interfaces, as well as in the local variables we use to derference the void pointer (note a few cases use pointers-to-pointers, so we mark everything const). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-28hash_pos(): convert to oid_pos()Jeff King
All of our callers are actually looking up an object_id, not a bare hash. Likewise, the arrays they are looking in are actual arrays of object_id (not just raw bytes of hashes, as we might find in a pack .idx; those are handled by bsearch_hash()). Using an object_id gives us more type safety, and makes the callers slightly shorter. It also gets rid of the word "sha1" from several access functions, though we could obviously also rename those with s/sha1/hash/. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-26Merge branch 'ma/more-opaque-lock-file'Junio C Hamano
Code clean-up. * ma/more-opaque-lock-file: read-cache: try not to peek into `struct {lock_,temp}file` refs/files-backend: don't peek into `struct lock_file` midx: don't peek into `struct lock_file` commit-graph: don't peek into `struct lock_file` builtin/gc: don't peek into `struct lock_file`
2021-01-22refs: switch peel_ref() to peel_iterated_oid()Jeff King
The peel_ref() interface is confusing and error-prone: - it's typically used by ref iteration callbacks that have both a refname and oid. But since they pass only the refname, we may load the ref value from the filesystem again. This is inefficient, but also means we are open to a race if somebody simultaneously updates the ref. E.g., this: int some_ref_cb(const char *refname, const struct object_id *oid, ...) { if (!peel_ref(refname, &peeled)) printf("%s peels to %s", oid_to_hex(oid), oid_to_hex(&peeled); } could print nonsense. It is correct to say "refname peels to..." (you may see the "before" value or the "after" value, either of which is consistent), but mentioning both oids may be mixing before/after values. Worse, whether this is possible depends on whether the optimization to read from the current iterator value kicks in. So it is actually not possible with: for_each_ref(some_ref_cb); but it _is_ possible with: head_ref(some_ref_cb); which does not use the iterator mechanism (though in practice, HEAD should never peel to anything, so this may not be triggerable). - it must take a fully-qualified refname for the read_ref_full() code path to work. Yet we routinely pass it partial refnames from callbacks to for_each_tag_ref(), etc. This happens to work when iterating because there we do not call read_ref_full() at all, and only use the passed refname to check if it is the same as the iterator. But the requirements for the function parameters are quite unclear. Instead of taking a refname, let's instead take an oid. That fixes both problems. It's a little funny for a "ref" function not to involve refs at all. The key thing is that it's optimizing under the hood based on having access to the ref iterator. So let's change the name to make it clear why you'd want this function versus just peel_object(). There are two other directions I considered but rejected: - we could pass the peel information into the each_ref_fn callback. However, we don't know if the caller actually wants it or not. For packed-refs, providing it is essentially free. But for loose refs, we actually have to peel the object, which would be wasteful in most cases. We could likewise pass in a flag to the callback indicating whether the peeled information is known, but that complicates those callbacks, as they then have to decide whether to manually peel themselves. Plus it requires changing the interface of every callback, whether they care about peeling or not, and there are many of them. - we could make a function to return the peeled value of the current iterated ref (computing it if necessary), and BUG() otherwise. I.e.: int peel_current_iterated_ref(struct object_id *out); Each of the current callers is an each_ref_fn callback, so they'd mostly be happy. But: - we use those callbacks with functions like head_ref(), which do not use the iteration code. So we'd need to handle the fallback case there, anyway. - it's possible that a caller would want to call into generic code that sometimes is used during iteration and sometimes not. This encapsulates the logic to do the fast thing when possible, and fallback when necessary. The implementation is mostly obvious, but I want to call out a few things in the patch: - the test-tool coverage for peel_ref() is now meaningless, as it all collapses to a single peel_object() call (arguably they were pretty uninteresting before; the tricky part of that function is the fast-path we see during iteration, but these calls didn't trigger that). I've just dropped it entirely, though note that some other tests relied on the tags we created; I've moved that creation to the tests where it matters. - we no longer need to take a ref_store parameter, since we'd never look up a ref now. We do still rely on a global "current iterator" variable which _could_ be kept per-ref-store. But in practice this is only useful if there are multiple recursive iterations, at which point the more appropriate solution is probably a stack of iterators. No caller used the actual ref-store parameter anyway (they all call the wrapper that passes the_repository). - the original only kicked in the optimization when the "refname" pointer matched (i.e., not string comparison). We do likewise with the "oid" parameter here, but fall back to doing an actual oideq() call. This in theory lets us kick in the optimization more often, though in practice no current caller cares. It should never be wrong, though (peeling is a property of an object, so two refs pointing to the same object would peel identically). - the original took care not to touch the peeled out-parameter unless we found something to put in it. But no caller cares about this, and anyway, it is enforced by peel_object() itself (and even in the optimized iterator case, that's where we eventually end up). We can shorten the code and avoid an extra copy by just passing the out-parameter through the stack. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-07commit-graph: don't peek into `struct lock_file`Martin Ågren
Similar to the previous commit, avoid peeking into the `struct lock_file`. Use the lock file API instead. Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-05hash-lookup: rename from sha1-lookupMartin Ågren
Change all remnants of "sha1" in hash-lookup.c and .h and rename them to reflect that we're not just able to handle SHA-1 these days. Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-05sha1-lookup: rename `sha1_pos()` as `hash_pos()`Martin Ågren
Rename this function to reflect that we're not just able to handle SHA-1 these days. There are a few instances of "sha1" left in sha1-lookup.[ch] after this, but those will be addressed in the next commit. Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-12-07commit-graph: use size_t for array allocation and indexingJeff King
Our packed_commit_list is an array of pointers to commit structs. We use "int" for the allocation, which is 32-bit even on 64-bit platforms. This isn't likely to overflow in practice (we're writing commit graphs, so you'd need to actually have billions of unique commits in the repository). But it's good practice to use size_t for allocations. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-12-07commit-graph: replace packed_oid_list with oid_arrayJeff King
Our custom packed_oid_list data structure is really just an oid_array in disguise. Let's switch to using the generic structure, which shortens and simplifies the code slightly. There's one slightly awkward part: in the old code we copied a hash straight from the mmap'd on-disk data into the final object_id. And now we'll copy to a temporary oid, which we'll then pass to oid_array_append(). But this is an operation we have to do all over the commit-graph code already, since it mostly uses object_id structs internally. I also measured "git commit-graph --append", which triggers this code path, and it showed no difference. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-12-07commit-graph: drop count_distinct_commits() functionJeff King
When writing a commit graph, we collect a list of object ids in an array, which we'll eventually copy into an array of "struct commit" pointers. Before we do that, though, we count the number of distinct commit entries. There's a subtle bug in this step, though. We eliminate not only duplicate oids, but also in split mode, any oids which are not commits or which are already in a graph file. However, the loop starts at index 1, always counting index 0 as distinct. And indeed it can't be a duplicate, since we check for those by comparing against the previous entry, and there isn't one for index 0. But it could be a commit that's already in a graph file, and we'd overcount the number of commits by 1 in that case. That turns out not to be a problem, though. The only things we do with the count are: - check if our count will overflow our data structures. But the limit there is 2^31 commits, so while this is a useful check, the off-by-one is not likely to matter. - pre-allocate the array of commit pointers. But over-allocating by one isn't a problem; we'll just waste a few extra bytes. The bug would be easy enough to fix, but we can observe that neither of those steps is necessary. After building the actual commit array, we'll likewise check its count for overflow. So the extra check of the distinct commit count here is redundant. And likewise we use ALLOC_GROW() when building the commit array, so there's no need to preallocate it (it's possible that doing so is slightly more efficient, but if we care we can just optimistically allocate one slot for each oid; I didn't bother here). So count_distinct_commits() isn't doing anything useful. Let's just get rid of that step. Note that a side effect of the function was that we sorted the list of oids, which we do rely on in copy_oids_to_commits(), since it must also skip the duplicates. So we'll move the qsort there. I didn't copy the "TODO" about adding more progress meters. It's actually quite hard to make a repository large enough for this qsort would take an appreciable amount of time, so this doesn't seem like a useful note. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-03Merge branch 'ds/commit-graph-merging-fix'Junio C Hamano
When "git commit-graph" detects the same commit recorded more than once while it is merging the layers, it used to die. The code now ignores all but one of them and continues. * ds/commit-graph-merging-fix: commit-graph: don't write commit-graph when disabled commit-graph: ignore duplicates when merging layers
2020-10-10commit-graph: don't write commit-graph when disabledDerrick Stolee
The core.commitGraph config setting can be set to 'false' to prevent parsing commits from the commit-graph file(s). This causes an issue when trying to write with "--split" which needs to distinguish between commits that are in the existing commit-graph layers and commits that are not. The existing mechanism uses parse_commit() and follows by checking if there is a 'graph_pos' that shows the commit was parsed from the commit-graph file. When core.commitGraph=false, we do not parse the commits from the commit-graph and 'graph_pos' indicates that no commits are in the existing file. The --split logic moves forward creating a new layer on top that holds all reachable commits, then possibly merges down into those layers, resulting in duplicate commits. The previous change makes that merging process more robust to such a situation in case it happens in the written commit-graph data. The easy answer here is to avoid writing a commit-graph if reading the commit-graph is disabled. Since the resulting commit-graph will would not be read by subsequent Git processes. This is more natural than forcing core.commitGraph to be true for the 'write' process. Reported-by: Thomas Braun <thomas.braun@virtuell-zuhause.de> Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Helped-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-10-10commit-graph: ignore duplicates when merging layersDerrick Stolee
Thomas reported [1] that a "git fetch" command was failing with an error saying "unexpected duplicate commit id". The root cause is that they had fetch.writeCommitGraph enabled which generates commit-graph chains, and this instance was merging two layers that both contained the same commit ID. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/55f8f00c-a61c-67d4-889e-a9501c596c39@virtuell-zuhause.de/ The initial assumption is that Git would not write a commit ID into a commit-graph layer if it already exists in a lower commit-graph layer. Somehow, this specific case did get into that situation, leading to this error. While unexpected, this isn't actually invalid (as long as the two layers agree on the metadata for the commit). When we parse a commit that does not have a graph_pos in the commit_graph_data_slab, we use binary search in the commit-graph layers to find the commit and set graph_pos. That position is never used again in this case. However, when we parse a commit from the commit-graph file, we load its parents from the commit-graph and assign graph_pos at that point. If those parents were already parsed from the commit-graph, then nothing needs to be done. Otherwise, this graph_pos is a valid position in the commit-graph so we can parse the parents, when necessary. Thus, this die() is too aggressive. The easiest thing to do would be to ignore the duplicates. If we only ignore the duplicates, then we will produce a commit-graph that has identical commit IDs listed in adjacent positions. This excess data will never be removed from the commit-graph, which could cascade into significantly bloated file sizes. Thankfully, we can collapse the list to erase the duplicate commit pointers. This allows us to get the end result we want without extra memory costs and minimal CPU time. The root cause is due to disabling core.commitGraph, which prevents parsing commits from the lower layers during a 'git commit-graph write --split' command. Since we use the 'graph_pos' value to determine whether a commit is in a lower layer, we never discover that those commits are already in the commit-graph chain and add them to the top layer. This layer is then merged down, creating duplicates. The test added in t5324-split-commit-graph.sh fails without this change. However, we still have not completely removed the need for this duplicate check. That will come in a follow-up change. Reported-by: Thomas Braun <thomas.braun@virtuell-zuhause.de> Helped-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Co-authored-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-09-30Merge branch 'tb/bloom-improvements'Junio C Hamano
"git commit-graph write" learned to limit the number of bloom filters that are computed from scratch with the --max-new-filters option. * tb/bloom-improvements: commit-graph: introduce 'commitGraph.maxNewFilters' builtin/commit-graph.c: introduce '--max-new-filters=<n>' commit-graph: rename 'split_commit_graph_opts' bloom: encode out-of-bounds filters as non-empty bloom/diff: properly short-circuit on max_changes bloom: use provided 'struct bloom_filter_settings' bloom: split 'get_bloom_filter()' in two commit-graph.c: store maximum changed paths commit-graph: respect 'commitGraph.readChangedPaths' t/helper/test-read-graph.c: prepare repo settings commit-graph: pass a 'struct repository *' in more places t4216: use an '&&'-chain commit-graph: introduce 'get_bloom_filter_settings()'
2020-09-26Merge branch 'ds/maintenance-part-1'Junio C Hamano
A "git gc"'s big brother has been introduced to take care of more repository maintenance tasks, not limited to the object database cleaning. * ds/maintenance-part-1: maintenance: add trace2 regions for task execution maintenance: add auto condition for commit-graph task maintenance: use pointers to check --auto maintenance: create maintenance.<task>.enabled config maintenance: take a lock on the objects directory maintenance: add --task option maintenance: add commit-graph task maintenance: initialize task array maintenance: replace run_auto_gc() maintenance: add --quiet option maintenance: create basic maintenance runner
2020-09-18builtin/commit-graph.c: introduce '--max-new-filters=<n>'Taylor Blau
Introduce a command-line flag to specify the maximum number of new Bloom filters that a 'git commit-graph write' is willing to compute from scratch. Prior to this patch, a commit-graph write with '--changed-paths' would compute Bloom filters for all selected commits which haven't already been computed (i.e., by a previous commit-graph write with '--split' such that a roll-up or replacement is performed). This behavior can cause prohibitively-long commit-graph writes for a variety of reasons: * There may be lots of filters whose diffs take a long time to generate (for example, they have close to the maximum number of changes, diffing itself takes a long time, etc). * Old-style commit-graphs (which encode filters with too many entries as not having been computed at all) cause us to waste time recomputing filters that appear to have not been computed only to discover that they are too-large. This can make the upper-bound of the time it takes for 'git commit-graph write --changed-paths' to be rather unpredictable. To make this command behave more predictably, introduce '--max-new-filters=<n>' to allow computing at most '<n>' Bloom filters from scratch. This lets "computing" already-known filters proceed quickly, while bounding the number of slow tasks that Git is willing to do. Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-09-18commit-graph: rename 'split_commit_graph_opts'Taylor Blau
In the subsequent commit, additional options will be added to the commit-graph API which have nothing to do with splitting. Rename the 'split_commit_graph_opts' structure to the more-generic 'commit_graph_opts' to encompass both. Likewise, rename the 'flags' member to instead be 'split_flags' to clarify that it only has to do with the behavior implied by '--split'. Suggested-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-09-18bloom: encode out-of-bounds filters as non-emptyTaylor Blau
When a changed-path Bloom filter has either zero, or more than a certain number (commonly 512) of entries, the commit-graph machinery encodes it as "missing". More specifically, it sets the indices adjacent in the BIDX chunk as equal to each other to indicate a "length 0" filter; that is, that the filter occupies zero bytes on disk. This has heretofore been fine, since the commit-graph machinery has no need to care about these filters with too few or too many changed paths. Both cases act like no filter has been generated at all, and so there is no need to store them. In a subsequent commit, however, the commit-graph machinery will learn to only compute Bloom filters for some commits in the current commit-graph layer. This is a change from the current implementation which computes Bloom filters for all commits that are in the layer being written. Critically for this patch, only computing some of the Bloom filters means adding a third state for length 0 Bloom filters: zero entries, too many entries, or "hasn't been computed". It will be important for that future patch to distinguish between "not representable" (i.e., zero or too-many changed paths), and "hasn't been computed". In particular, we don't want to waste time recomputing filters that have already been computed. To that end, change how we store Bloom filters in the "computed but not representable" category: - Bloom filters with no entries are stored as a single byte with all bits low (i.e., all queries to that Bloom filter will return "definitely not") - Bloom filters with too many entries are stored as a single byte with all bits set high (i.e., all queries to that Bloom filter will return "maybe"). These rules are sufficient to not incur a behavior change by changing the on-disk representation of these two classes. Likewise, no specification changes are necessary for the commit-graph format, either: - Filters that were previously empty will be recomputed and stored according to the new rules, and - old clients reading filters generated by new clients will interpret the filters correctly and be none the wiser to how they were generated. Clients will invoke the Bloom machinery in more cases than before, but this can be addressed by returning a NULL filter when all bits are set high. This can be addressed in a future patch. Note that this does increase the size of on-disk commit-graphs, but far less than other proposals. In particular, this is generally more efficient than storing a bitmap for which commits haven't computed their Bloom filters. Storing a bitmap incurs a penalty of one bit per commit, whereas storing explicit filters as above incurs a penalty of one byte per too-large or empty commit. In practice, these boundary commits likely occupy a small proportion of the overall number of commits, and so the size penalty is likely smaller than storing a bitmap for all commits. See, for example, these relative proportions of such boundary commits (collected by SZEDER Gábor): | Percentage of | commit-graph | | | commits modifying | file size | | ├────────┬──────────────┼───────────────────┤ pct. | | 0 path | >= 512 paths | before | after | change | ┌────────────────┼────────┼──────────────┼─────────┼─────────┼───────────┤ | android-base | 13.20% | 0.13% | 37.468M | 37.534M | +0.1741 % | | cmssw | 0.15% | 0.23% | 17.118M | 17.119M | +0.0091 % | | cpython | 3.07% | 0.01% | 7.967M | 7.971M | +0.0423 % | | elasticsearch | 0.70% | 1.00% | 8.833M | 8.835M | +0.0128 % | | gcc | 0.00% | 0.08% | 16.073M | 16.074M | +0.0030 % | | gecko-dev | 0.14% | 0.64% | 59.868M | 59.874M | +0.0105 % | | git | 0.11% | 0.02% | 3.895M | 3.895M | +0.0020 % | | glibc | 0.02% | 0.10% | 3.555M | 3.555M | +0.0021 % | | go | 0.00% | 0.07% | 3.186M | 3.186M | +0.0018 % | | homebrew-cask | 0.40% | 0.02% | 7.035M | 7.035M | +0.0065 % | | homebrew-core | 0.01% | 0.01% | 11.611M | 11.611M | +0.0002 % | | jdk | 0.26% | 5.64% | 5.537M | 5.540M | +0.0590 % | | linux | 0.01% | 0.51% | 63.735M | 63.740M | +0.0073 % | | llvm-project | 0.12% | 0.03% | 25.515M | 25.516M | +0.0050 % | | rails | 0.10% | 0.10% | 6.252M | 6.252M | +0.0027 % | | rust | 0.07% | 0.17% | 9.364M | 9.364M | +0.0033 % | | tensorflow | 0.09% | 1.02% | 7.009M | 7.010M | +0.0158 % | | webkit | 0.05% | 0.31% | 17.405M | 17.406M | +0.0047 % | (where the above increase is determined by computing a non-split commit-graph before and after this patch). Given that these projects are all "large" by commit count, the storage cost by writing these filters explicitly is negligible. In the most extreme example, android-base (which has 494,848 commits at the time of writing) would have its commit-graph increase by a modest 68.4 KB. Finally, a test to exercise filters which contain too many changed path entries will be introduced in a subsequent patch. Suggested-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Jakub Narębski <jnareb@gmail.com> Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Helped-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-09-17maintenance: add commit-graph taskDerrick Stolee
The first new task in the 'git maintenance' builtin is the 'commit-graph' task. This updates the commit-graph file incrementally with the command git commit-graph write --reachable --split By writing an incremental commit-graph file using the "--split" option we minimize the disruption from this operation. The default behavior is to merge layers until the new "top" layer is less than half the size of the layer below. This provides quick writes most of the time, with the longer writes following a power law distribution. Most importantly, concurrent Git processes only look at the commit-graph-chain file for a very short amount of time, so they will verly likely not be holding a handle to the file when we try to replace it. (This only matters on Windows.) If a concurrent process reads the old commit-graph-chain file, but our job expires some of the .graph files before they can be read, then those processes will see a warning message (but not fail). This could be avoided by a future update to use the --expire-time argument when writing the commit-graph. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-09-17bloom: use provided 'struct bloom_filter_settings'Taylor Blau
When 'get_or_compute_bloom_filter()' needs to compute a Bloom filter from scratch, it looks to the default 'struct bloom_filter_settings' in order to determine the maximum number of changed paths, number of bits per entry, and so on. All of these values have so far been constant, and so there was no need to pass in a pointer from the caller (eg., the one that is stored in the 'struct write_commit_graph_context'). Start passing in a 'struct bloom_filter_settings *' instead of using the default values to respect graph-specific settings (eg., in the case of setting 'GIT_TEST_BLOOM_SETTINGS_MAX_CHANGED_PATHS'). In order to have an initialized value for these settings, move its initialization to earlier in the commit-graph write. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-09-17bloom: split 'get_bloom_filter()' in twoTaylor Blau
'get_bloom_filter' takes a flag to control whether it will compute a Bloom filter if the requested one is missing. In the next patch, we'll add yet another parameter to this method, which would force all but one caller to specify an extra 'NULL' parameter at the end. Instead of doing this, split 'get_bloom_filter' into two functions: 'get_bloom_filter' and 'get_or_compute_bloom_filter'. The former only looks up a Bloom filter (and does not compute one if it's missing, thus dropping the 'compute_if_not_present' flag). The latter does compute missing Bloom filters, with an additional parameter to store whether or not it needed to do so. This simplifies many call-sites, since the majority of existing callers to 'get_bloom_filter' do not want missing Bloom filters to be computed (so they can drop the parameter entirely and use the simpler version of the function). While we're at it, instrument the new 'get_or_compute_bloom_filter()' with counters in the 'write_commit_graph_context' struct which store the number of filters that we did and didn't compute, as well as filters that were truncated. It would be nice to drop the 'compute_if_not_present' flag entirely, since all remaining callers of 'get_or_compute_bloom_filter' pass it as '1', but this will change in a future patch and hence cannot be removed. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-09-17commit-graph.c: store maximum changed pathsTaylor Blau
For now, we assume that there is a fixed constant describing the maximum number of changed paths we are willing to store in a Bloom filter. Prepare for that to (at least partially) not be the case by making it a member of the 'struct bloom_filter_settings'. This will be helpful in the subsequent patches by reducing the size of test cases that exercise storing too many changed paths, as well as preparing for an eventual future in which this value might change. This patch alone does not cause newly generated Bloom filters to use a custom upper-bound on the maximum number of changed paths a single Bloom filter can hold, that will occur in a later patch. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-09-09commit-graph: respect 'commitGraph.readChangedPaths'Taylor Blau
Git uses the 'core.commitGraph' configuration value to control whether or not the commit graph is used when parsing commits or performing a traversal. Now that commit-graphs can also contain a section for changed-path Bloom filters, administrators that already have commit-graphs may find it convenient to use those graphs without relying on their changed-path Bloom filters. This can happen, for example, during a staged roll-out, or in the event of an incident. Introduce 'commitGraph.readChangedPaths' to control whether or not Bloom filters are read. Note that this configuration is independent from both: - 'core.commitGraph', to allow flexibility in using all parts of a commit-graph _except_ for its Bloom filters. - The '--changed-paths' option for 'git commit-graph write', to allow reading and writing Bloom filters to be controlled independently. When the variable is set, pretend as if no Bloom data was specified at all. This avoids adding additional special-casing outside of the commit-graph internals. Suggested-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-09-09commit-graph: pass a 'struct repository *' in more placesTaylor Blau
In a future commit, some commit-graph internals will want access to 'r->settings', but we only have the 'struct object_directory *' corresponding to that repository. Add an additional parameter to pass the repository around in more places. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-09-09commit-graph: introduce 'get_bloom_filter_settings()'Taylor Blau
Many places in the code often need a pointer to the commit-graph's 'struct bloom_filter_settings', in which case they often take the value from the top-most commit-graph. In the non-split case, this works as expected. In the split case, however, things get a little tricky. Not all layers in a chain of incremental commit-graphs are required to themselves have Bloom data, and so whether or not some part of the code uses Bloom filters depends entirely on whether or not the top-most level of the commit-graph chain has Bloom filters. This has been the behavior since Bloom filters were introduced, and has been codified into the tests since a759bfa9ee (t4216: add end to end tests for git log with Bloom filters, 2020-04-06). In fact, t4216.130 requires that Bloom filters are not used in exactly the case described earlier. There is no reason that this needs to be the case, since it is perfectly valid for commits in an earlier layer to have Bloom filters when commits in a newer layer do not. Since Bloom settings are guaranteed in practice to be the same for any layer in a chain that has Bloom data, it is sufficient to traverse the '->base_graph' pointer until either (1) a non-null 'struct bloom_filter_settings *' is found, or (2) until we are at the root of the commit-graph chain. Introduce a 'get_bloom_filter_settings()' function that does just this, and use it instead of purely dereferencing the top-most graph's '->bloom_filter_settings' pointer. While we're at it, add an additional test in t5324 to guard against code in the commit-graph writing machinery that doesn't correctly handle a NULL 'struct bloom_filter *'. Co-authored-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-18commit-graph: use the "hash version" byteDerrick Stolee
The commit-graph format reserved a byte among the header of the file to store a "hash version". During the SHA-256 work, this was not modified because file formats are not necessarily intended to work across hash versions. If a repository has SHA-256 as its hash algorithm, it automatically up-shifts the lengths of object names in all necessary formats. However, since we have this byte available for adjusting the version, we can make the file formats more obviously incompatible instead of relying on other context from the repository. Update the oid_version() method in commit-graph.c to add a new value, 2, for sha-256. This automatically writes the new value in a SHA-256 repository _and_ verifies the value is correct. This is a breaking change relative to the current 'master' branch since 092b677 (Merge branch 'bc/sha-256-cvs-svn-updates', 2020-08-13) but it is not breaking relative to any released version of Git. The test impact is relatively minor: the output of 'test-tool read-graph' lists the header information, so those instances of '1' need to be replaced with a variable determined by GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_HASH. A more careful test is added that specifically creates a repository of each type then swaps the commit-graph files. The important value here is that the "git log" command succeeds while writing a message to stderr. Helped-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-07-30Merge branch 'ds/commit-graph-bloom-updates' into masterJunio C Hamano
Updates to the changed-paths bloom filter. * ds/commit-graph-bloom-updates: commit-graph: check all leading directories in changed path Bloom filters revision: empty pathspecs should not use Bloom filters revision.c: fix whitespace commit-graph: check chunk sizes after writing commit-graph: simplify chunk writes into loop commit-graph: unify the signatures of all write_graph_chunk_*() functions commit-graph: persist existence of changed-paths bloom: fix logic in get_bloom_filter() commit-graph: change test to die on parse, not load commit-graph: place bloom_settings in context
2020-07-30Merge branch 'sg/commit-graph-cleanups' into masterJunio C Hamano
The changed-path Bloom filter is improved using ideas from an independent implementation. * sg/commit-graph-cleanups: commit-graph: simplify write_commit_graph_file() #2 commit-graph: simplify write_commit_graph_file() #1 commit-graph: simplify parse_commit_graph() #2 commit-graph: simplify parse_commit_graph() #1 commit-graph: clean up #includes diff.h: drop diff_tree_oid() & friends' return value commit-slab: add a function to deep free entries on the slab commit-graph-format.txt: all multi-byte numbers are in network byte order commit-graph: fix parsing the Chunk Lookup table tree-walk.c: don't match submodule entries for 'submod/anything'
2020-07-16Merge branch 'sg/commit-graph-progress-fix' into masterJunio C Hamano
The code to produce progress output from "git commit-graph --write" had a few breakages, which have been fixed. * sg/commit-graph-progress-fix: commit-graph: fix "Writing out commit graph" progress counter commit-graph: fix progress of reachable commits
2020-07-10Merge branch 'tb/fix-persistent-shallow' into masterJunio C Hamano
When "fetch.writeCommitGraph" configuration is set in a shallow repository and a fetch moves the shallow boundary, we wrote out broken commit-graph files that do not match the reality, which has been corrected. * tb/fix-persistent-shallow: commit.c: don't persist substituted parents when unshallowing
2020-07-09commit-graph: fix "Writing out commit graph" progress counterSZEDER Gábor
76ffbca71a (commit-graph: write Bloom filters to commit graph file, 2020-04-06) added two delayed progress lines to writing the Bloom filter index and data chunk. This is wrong, because a single common progress is used while writing all chunks, which is not updated while writing these two new chunks, resulting in incomplete-looking "done" lines: Expanding reachable commits in commit graph: 888679, done. Computing commit changed paths Bloom filters: 100% (888678/888678), done. Writing out commit graph in 6 passes: 66% (3554712/5332068), done. Use the common 'struct progress' instance while writing the Bloom filter chunks as well. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-07-09commit-graph: fix progress of reachable commitsSZEDER Gábor
To display a progress line while iterating over all refs, d335ce8f24 (commit-graph.c: show progress of finding reachable commits, 2020-05-13) should have added a pair of start_delayed_progress() and stop_progress() calls around a for_each_ref() invocation. Alas, the stop_progress() call ended up at the wrong place, after write_commit_graph(), which does all the commit-graph computation and writing, and has several progress lines of its own. Consequently, that new Collecting referenced commits: 123 progress line is overwritten by the first progress line shown by write_commit_graph(), and its final "done" line is shown last, after everything is finished: Expanding reachable commits in commit graph: 344786, done. Computing commit changed paths Bloom filters: 100% (344786/344786), done. Collecting referenced commits: 154, done. Move that stop_progress() call to the right place. While at it, drop the unnecessary 'if (data.progress)' condition protecting the stop_progress() call, because that function is prepared to handle a NULL progress struct. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-07-09commit.c: don't persist substituted parents when unshallowingTaylor Blau
Since 37b9dcabfc (shallow.c: use '{commit,rollback}_shallow_file', 2020-04-22), Git knows how to reset stat-validity checks for the $GIT_DIR/shallow file, allowing it to change between a shallow and non-shallow state in the same process (e.g., in the case of 'git fetch --unshallow'). However, when $GIT_DIR/shallow changes, Git does not alter or remove any grafts (nor substituted parents) in memory. This comes up in a "git fetch --unshallow" with fetch.writeCommitGraph set to true. Ordinarily in a shallow repository (and before 37b9dcabfc, even in this case), commit_graph_compatible() would return false, indicating that the repository should not be used to write a commit-graphs (since commit-graph files cannot represent a shallow history). But since 37b9dcabfc, in an --unshallow operation that check succeeds. Thus even though the repository isn't shallow any longer (that is, we have all of the objects), the in-core representation of those objects still has munged parents at the shallow boundaries. When the commit-graph write proceeds, we use the incorrect parentage, producing wrong results. There are two ways for a user to work around this: either (1) set 'fetch.writeCommitGraph' to 'false', or (2) drop the commit-graph after unshallowing. One way to fix this would be to reset the parsed object pool entirely (flushing the cache and thus preventing subsequent reads from modifying their parents) after unshallowing. That would produce a problem when callers have a now-stale reference to the old pool, and so this patch implements a different approach. Instead, attach a new bit to the pool, 'substituted_parent', which indicates if the repository *ever* stored a commit which had its parents modified (i.e., the shallow boundary prior to unshallowing). This bit needs to be sticky because all reads subsequent to modifying a commit's parents are unreliable when unshallowing. Modify the check in 'commit_graph_compatible' to take this bit into account, and correctly avoid generating commit-graphs in this case, thus solving the bug. Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Helped-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Reported-by: Jay Conrod <jayconrod@google.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-07-02commit-graph: check chunk sizes after writingSZEDER Gábor
In my experience while experimenting with new commit-graph chunks, early versions of the corresponding new write_commit_graph_my_chunk() functions are, sadly but not surprisingly, often buggy, and write more or less data than they are supposed to, especially if the chunk size is not directly proportional to the number of commits. This then causes all kinds of issues when reading such a bogus commit-graph file, raising the question of whether the writing or the reading part happens to be buggy this time. Let's catch such issues early, already when writing the commit-graph file, and check that each write_graph_chunk_*() function wrote the amount of data that it was expected to, and what has been encoded in the Chunk Lookup table. Now that all commit-graph chunks are written in a loop we can do this check in a single place for all chunks, and any chunks added in the future will get checked as well. Helped-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-07-02commit-graph: simplify chunk writes into loopSZEDER Gábor
In write_commit_graph_file() we now have one block of code filling the array of 'struct chunk_info' with the IDs and sizes of chunks to be written, and an other block of code calling the functions responsible for writing individual chunks. In case of optional chunks like Extra Edge List an Base Graphs List there is also a condition checking whether that chunk is necessary/desired, and that same condition is repeated in both blocks of code. Other, newer chunks have similar optional conditions. Eliminate these repeated conditions by storing the function pointers responsible for writing individual chunks in the 'struct chunk_info' array as well, and calling them in a loop to write the commit-graph file. This will open up the possibility for a bit of foolproofing in the following patch. Helped-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-07-02commit-graph: unify the signatures of all write_graph_chunk_*() functionsSZEDER Gábor
Update the write_graph_chunk_*() helper functions to have the same signature: - Return an int error code from all these functions. write_graph_chunk_base() already has an int error code, now the others will have one, too, but since they don't indicate any error, they will always return 0. - Drop the hash size parameter of write_graph_chunk_oids() and write_graph_chunk_data(); its value can be read directly from 'the_hash_algo' inside these functions as well. This opens up the possibility for further cleanups and foolproofing in the following two patches. Helped-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-07-02commit-graph: persist existence of changed-pathsDerrick Stolee
The changed-path Bloom filters were released in v2.27.0, but have a significant drawback. A user can opt-in to writing the changed-path filters using the "--changed-paths" option to "git commit-graph write" but the next write will drop the filters unless that option is specified. This becomes even more important when considering the interaction with gc.writeCommitGraph (on by default) or fetch.writeCommitGraph (part of features.experimental). These config options trigger commit-graph writes that the user did not signal, and hence there is no --changed-paths option available. Allow a user that opts-in to the changed-path filters to persist the property of "my commit-graph has changed-path filters" automatically. A user can drop filters using the --no-changed-paths option. In the process, we need to be extremely careful to match the Bloom filter settings as specified by the commit-graph. This will allow future versions of Git to customize these settings, and the version with this change will persist those settings as commit-graphs are rewritten on top. Use the trace2 API to signal the settings used during the write, and check that output in a test after manually adjusting the correct bytes in the commit-graph file. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-07-02bloom: fix logic in get_bloom_filter()Derrick Stolee
The get_bloom_filter() method is a bit complicated in some parts where it does not need to be. In particular, it needs to return a NULL filter only when compute_if_not_present is zero AND the filter data cannot be loaded from a commit-graph file. This currently happens by accident because the commit-graph does not load changed-path Bloom filters from an existing commit-graph when writing a new one. This will change in a later patch. Also clean up some style issues while we are here. One side-effect of returning a NULL filter is that the filters that are reported as "too large" will now be reported as NULL insead of length zero. This case was not properly covered before, so add a test. Further, remote the counting of the zero-length filters from revision.c and the trace2 logs. Helped-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Helped-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-24commit-graph: change test to die on parse, not loadDerrick Stolee
43d3561 (commit-graph write: don't die if the existing graph is corrupt, 2019-03-25) introduced the GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_DIE_ON_LOAD environment variable. This was created to verify that commit-graph was not loaded when writing a new non-incremental commit-graph. An upcoming change wants to load a commit-graph in some valuable cases, but we want to maintain that we don't trust the commit-graph data when writing our new file. Instead of dying on load, instead die if we ever try to parse a commit from the commit-graph. This functionally verifies the same intended behavior, but allows a more advanced feature in the next change. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-24commit-graph: place bloom_settings in contextDerrick Stolee
Place an instance of struct bloom_settings into the struct write_commit_graph_context. This allows simplifying the function prototype of write_graph_chunk_bloom_data(). This will allow us to combine the function prototypes and use function pointers to simplify write_commit_graph_file(). By using a pointer, we can later replace the settings to match those that exist in the current commit-graph, in case a future Git version allows customization of these parameters. Reported-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-18commit-graph: minimize commit_graph_data_slab accessAbhishek Kumar
In an earlier patch, multiple struct acccesses to `graph_pos` and `generation` were auto-converted to multiple method calls. Since the values are fixed and commit-slab access costly, we would be better off with storing the values as a local variable and reusing it. Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-18commit: move members graph_pos, generation to a slabAbhishek Kumar
We remove members `graph_pos` and `generation` from the struct commit. The default assignments in init_commit_node() are no longer valid, which is fine as the slab helpers return appropriate default values and the assignments are removed. We will replace existing use of commit->generation and commit->graph_pos by commit_graph_data_slab helpers using `contrib/coccinelle/commit.cocci'. Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-18commit-graph: introduce commit_graph_data_slabAbhishek Kumar
The struct commit is used in many contexts. However, members `generation` and `graph_pos` are only used for commit-graph related operations and otherwise waste memory. This wastage would have been more pronounced as we transition to generation number v2, which uses 64-bit generation number instead of current 32-bits. As they are often accessed together, let's introduce struct commit_graph_data and move them to a commit_graph_data slab. While the overall test suite runs just as fast as master, (series: 26m48s, master: 27m34s, faster by 2.87%), certain commands like `git merge-base --is-ancestor` were slowed by 40% as discovered by Szeder Gábor [1]. After minimizing commit-slab access, the slow down persists but is closer to 20%. Derrick Stolee believes the slow down is attributable to the underlying algorithm rather than the slowness of commit-slab access [2] and we will follow-up in a later series. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200607195347.GA8232@szeder.dev/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/13db757a-9412-7f1e-805c-8a028c4ab2b1@gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-09Merge branch 'tb/commit-graph-no-check-oids'Junio C Hamano
Clean-up the commit-graph codepath. * tb/commit-graph-no-check-oids: commit-graph: drop COMMIT_GRAPH_WRITE_CHECK_OIDS flag t5318: reorder test below 'graph_read_expect' commit-graph.c: simplify 'fill_oids_from_commits' builtin/commit-graph.c: dereference tags in builtin builtin/commit-graph.c: extract 'read_one_commit()' commit-graph.c: peel refs in 'add_ref_to_set' commit-graph.c: show progress of finding reachable commits commit-graph.c: extract 'refs_cb_data'
2020-06-08commit-graph: simplify write_commit_graph_file() #2SZEDER Gábor
Unify the 'chunk_ids' and 'chunk_sizes' arrays into an array of 'struct chunk_info'. This will allow more cleanups in the following patches. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-08commit-graph: simplify write_commit_graph_file() #1SZEDER Gábor
In write_commit_graph_file() one block of code fills the array of chunk IDs, another block of code fills the array of chunk offsets, then the chunk IDs and offsets are written to the Chunk Lookup table, and finally a third block of code writes the actual chunks. In case of optional chunks like Extra Edge List and Base Graphs List there is also a condition checking whether that chunk is necessary/desired, and that same condition is repeated in all those three blocks of code. This patch series is about to add more optional chunks, so there would be even more repeated conditions. Those chunk offsets are relative to the beginning of the file, so they inherently depend on the size of the Chunk Lookup table, which in turn depends on the number of chunks that are to be written to the commit-graph file. IOW at the time we set the first chunk's ID we can't yet know its offset, because we don't yet know how many chunks there are. Simplify this by initially filling an array of chunk sizes, not offsets, and calculate the offsets based on the chunk sizes only later, while we are writing the Chunk Lookup table. This way we can fill the arrays of chunk IDs and sizes in one go, eliminating one set of repeated conditions. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-08commit-graph: simplify parse_commit_graph() #2SZEDER Gábor
The Chunk Lookup table stores the chunks' starting offset in the commit-graph file, not their sizes. Consequently, the size of a chunk can only be calculated by subtracting its offset from the offset of the subsequent chunk (or that of the terminating label). This is currenly implemented in a bit complicated way: as we iterate over the entries of the Chunk Lookup table, we check the id of each chunk and store its starting offset, then we check the id of the last seen chunk and calculate its size using its previously saved offset. At the moment there is only one chunk for which we calculate its size, but this patch series will add more, and the repeated chunk id checks are not that pretty. Instead let's read ahead the offset of the next chunk on each iteration, so we can calculate the size of each chunk right away, right where we store its starting offset. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-08commit-graph: simplify parse_commit_graph() #1SZEDER Gábor
While we iterate over all entries of the Chunk Lookup table we make sure that we don't attempt to read past the end of the mmap-ed commit-graph file, and check in each iteration that the chunk ID and offset we are about to read is still within the mmap-ed memory region. However, these checks in each iteration are not really necessary, because the number of chunks in the commit-graph file is already known before this loop from the just parsed commit-graph header. So let's check that the commit-graph file is large enough for all entries in the Chunk Lookup table before we start iterating over those entries, and drop those per-iteration checks. While at it, take into account the size of everything that is necessary to have a valid commit-graph file, i.e. the size of the header, the size of the mandatory OID Fanout chunk, and the size of the signature in the trailer as well. Note that this necessitates the change of the error message as well, and, consequently, have to update the 'detect incorrect chunk count' test in 't5318-commit-graph.sh' as well. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>