| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
"git grep" learned to expand the sparse-index more lazily and on
demand in a sparse checkout.
* sy/sparse-grep:
builtin/grep.c: integrate with sparse index
|
|
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
|
|
Explicitly cloning over the "file://" protocol in t1092 in preparation
for merging a security release which will change the default value of
this configuration to be "user".
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
|
|
Turn on sparse index and remove ensure_full_index().
Before this patch, `git-grep` utilizes the ensure_full_index() method to
expand the index and search all the entries. Because this method
requires walking all the trees and constructing the index, it is the
slow part within the whole command.
To achieve better performance, this patch uses grep_tree() to search the
sparse directory entries and get rid of the ensure_full_index() method.
Why grep_tree() is a better choice over ensure_full_index()?
1) grep_tree() is as correct as ensure_full_index(). grep_tree() looks
into every sparse-directory entry (represented by a tree) recursively
when looping over the index, and the result of doing so matches the
result of expanding the index.
2) grep_tree() utilizes pathspecs to limit the scope of searching.
ensure_full_index() always expands the index, which means it will
always walk all the trees and blobs in the repo without caring if
the user only wants a subset of the content, i.e. using a pathspec.
On the other hand, grep_tree() will only search the contents that
match the pathspec, and thus possibly walking fewer trees.
3) grep_tree() does not construct and copy back a new index, while
ensure_full_index() does. This also saves some time.
----------------
Performance test
- Summary:
p2000 tests demonstrate a ~71% execution time reduction for
`git grep --cached bogus -- "f2/f1/f1/*"` using tree-walking logic.
However, notice that this result varies depending on the pathspec
given. See below "Command used for testing" for more details.
Test HEAD~ HEAD
-------------------------------------------------------
2000.78: git grep ... (full-v3) 0.35 0.39 (≈)
2000.79: git grep ... (full-v4) 0.36 0.30 (≈)
2000.80: git grep ... (sparse-v3) 0.88 0.23 (-73.8%)
2000.81: git grep ... (sparse-v4) 0.83 0.26 (-68.6%)
- Command used for testing:
git grep --cached bogus -- "f2/f1/f1/*"
The reason for specifying a pathspec is that, if we don't specify a
pathspec, then grep_tree() will walk all the trees and blobs to find the
pattern, and the time consumed doing so is not too different from using
the original ensure_full_index() method, which also spends most of the
time walking trees. However, when a pathspec is specified, this latest
logic will only walk the area of trees enclosed by the pathspec, and the
time consumed is reasonably a lot less.
Generally speaking, because the performance gain is acheived by walking
less trees, which are specified by the pathspec, the HEAD time v.s.
HEAD~ time in sparse-v[3|4], should be proportional to
"pathspec enclosed area" v.s. "all area", respectively. Namely, the
wider the <pathspec> is encompassing, the less the performance
difference between HEAD~ and HEAD, and vice versa.
That is, if we don't specify a pathspec, the performance difference [1]
is indistinguishable: both methods walk all the trees and take generally
same amount of time (even with the index construction time included for
ensure_full_index()).
[1] Performance test result without pathspec (hence walking all trees):
Command used:
git grep --cached bogus
Test HEAD~ HEAD
---------------------------------------------------
2000.78: git grep ... (full-v3) 6.17 5.19 (≈)
2000.79: git grep ... (full-v4) 6.19 5.46 (≈)
2000.80: git grep ... (sparse-v3) 6.57 6.44 (≈)
2000.81: git grep ... (sparse-v4) 6.65 6.28 (≈)
--------------------------
NEEDSWORK about submodules
There are a few NEEDSWORKs that belong to improvements beyond this
topic. See the NEEDSWORK in builtin/grep.c::grep_submodule() for
more context. The other two NEEDSWORKs in t1092 are also relative.
Suggested-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Helped-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Helped-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaoxuan Yuan <shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Segfault fix-up to an earlier fix to the topic to teach "git reset"
and "git checkout" work better in a sparse checkout.
* vd/sparse-reset-checkout-fixes:
unpack-trees: fix sparse directory recursion check
|
|
Ensure 'is_sparse_directory_entry()' receives a valid 'name_entry *' if one
exists in the list of tree(s) being unpacked in 'unpack_callback()'.
Currently, 'is_sparse_directory_entry()' is called with the first
'name_entry' in the 'names' list of entries on 'unpack_callback()'. However,
this entry may be empty even when other elements of 'names' are not (such as
when switching from an orphan branch back to a "normal" branch). As a
result, 'is_sparse_directory_entry()' could incorrectly indicate that a
sparse directory is *not* actually sparse because the name of the index
entry does not match the (empty) 'name_entry' path.
Fix the issue by using the existing 'name_entry *p' value in
'unpack_callback()', which points to the first non-empty entry in 'names'.
Because 'p' is 'const', also update 'is_sparse_directory_entry()'s
'name_entry *' argument to be 'const'.
Finally, add a regression test case.
Reported-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Failures within `for` and `while` loops can go unnoticed if not detected
and signaled manually since the loop itself does not abort when a
contained command fails, nor will a failure necessarily be detected when
the loop finishes since the loop returns the exit code of the last
command it ran on the final iteration, which may not be the command
which failed. Therefore, detect and signal failures manually within
loops using the idiom `|| return 1` (or `|| exit 1` within subshells).
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
This test wants to verify that `git blame` errors out when asked to
blame a file _not_ in the sparse checkout. However, the very first file
it asks to blame _is_ present in the checkout, thus `test_must_fail git
blame $file` gives an unexpected result (the "blame" succeeds). This
problem went unnoticed because the test invokes `test_must_fail git
blame $file` in loop but forgets to break out of the loop early upon
failure, thus the failure gets swallowed.
Fix the test by having it not ask to blame a file present in the sparse
checkout, and instead only blame files not present, as intended. While
at it, also add the missing `|| return 1` which allowed this bug to go
unnoticed.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Enable the sparse index within the `git-rm` command.
The `p2000` tests demonstrate a ~92% execution time reduction for
'git rm' using a sparse index.
Test HEAD~1 HEAD
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000.74: git rm ... (full-v3) 0.41(0.37+0.05) 0.43(0.36+0.07) +4.9%
2000.75: git rm ... (full-v4) 0.38(0.34+0.05) 0.39(0.35+0.05) +2.6%
2000.76: git rm ... (sparse-v3) 0.57(0.56+0.01) 0.05(0.05+0.00) -91.2%
2000.77: git rm ... (sparse-v4) 0.57(0.55+0.02) 0.03(0.03+0.00) -94.7%
----
Also, normalize a behavioral difference of `git-rm` under sparse-index.
See related discussion [1].
`git-rm` a sparse-directory entry within a sparse-index enabled repo
behaves differently from a sparse directory within a sparse-checkout
enabled repo.
For example, in a sparse-index repo, where 'folder1' is a
sparse-directory entry, `git rm -r --sparse folder1` provides this:
rm 'folder1/'
Whereas in a sparse-checkout repo *without* sparse-index, doing so
provides this:
rm 'folder1/0/0/0'
rm 'folder1/0/1'
rm 'folder1/a'
Because `git rm` a sparse-directory entry does not need to expand the
index, therefore we should accept the current behavior, which is faster
than "expand the sparse-directory entry to match the sparse-checkout
situation".
Modify a previous test so such difference is not considered as an error.
[1] https://github.com/ffyuanda/git/pull/6#discussion_r934861398
Helped-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaoxuan Yuan <shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Remove the `ensure_full_index()` method so `git-rm` does not always
expand the index when the expansion is unnecessary, i.e. when
<pathspec> does not have any possibilities to match anything outside
of sparse-checkout definition.
Expand the index when the <pathspec> needs an expanded index, i.e. the
<pathspec> contains wildcard that may need a full-index or the
<pathspec> is simply outside of sparse-checkout definition.
Notice that the test 'rm pathspec expands index when necessary' in
t1092 *is* testing this code change behavior, though it will be marked
as 'test_expect_success' only in the next patch, where we officially
mark `command_requires_full_index = 0`, so the index does not expand
unless we tell it to do so.
Notice that because we also want `ensure_full_index` to record the
stdout and stderr from Git command, a corresponding modification
is also included in this patch. The reason we want the "sparse-index-out"
and "sparse-index-err", is that we need to make sure there is no error
from Git command itself, so we can rely on the `test_region` result
and determine if the index is expanded or not.
Helped-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaoxuan Yuan <shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add tests for `git-rm`, make sure it behaves as expected when
<pathspec> is both inside or outside of sparse-checkout definition.
Helped-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaoxuan Yuan <shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
* vd/sparse-reset-checkout-fixes:
unpack-trees: unpack new trees as sparse directories
cache.h: create 'index_name_pos_sparse()'
oneway_diff: handle removed sparse directories
checkout: fix nested sparse directory diff in sparse index
|
|
If 'unpack_single_entry()' is unpacking a new directory tree (that is, one
not already present in the index) into a sparse index, unpack the tree as a
sparse directory rather than traversing its contents and unpacking each file
individually. This helps keep the sparse index as collapsed as possible in
cases such as 'git reset --hard' restoring a outside-of-cone directory
removed with 'git rm -r --sparse'.
Without this patch, 'unpack_single_entry()' will only unpack a directory
into the index as a sparse directory (rather than traversing into it and
unpacking its files one-by-one) if an entry with the same name already
exists in the index. This patch allows sparse directory unpacking without a
matching index entry when the following conditions are met:
1. the directory's path is outside the sparse cone, and
2. there are no children of the directory in the index
If a directory meets these requirements (as determined by
'is_new_sparse_dir()'), 'unpack_single_entry()' unpacks the sparse directory
index entry and propagates the decision back up to 'unpack_callback()' to
prevent unnecessary tree traversal into the unpacked directory.
Reported-by: Shaoxuan Yuan <shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add the 'recursive' diff flag to the local changes reporting done by 'git
checkout' in 'show_local_changes()'. Without the flag enabled, unexpanded
sparse directories will not be recursed into to report the diff of each
file's contents, resulting in the reported local changes including
"modified" sparse directories.
The same issue was found and fixed for 'git status' in 2c521b0e49 (status:
fix nested sparse directory diff in sparse index, 2022-03-01)
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Originally, moving a <source> directory which is not on-disk due
to its existence outside of sparse-checkout cone, "giv mv" command
errors out with "bad source".
Add a helper check_dir_in_index() function to see if a directory
name exists in the index. Also add a SKIP_WORKTREE_DIR bit to mark
such directories.
Change the checking logic, so that such <source> directory makes
"giv mv" command warns with "advise_on_updating_sparse_paths()"
instead of "bad source"; also user now can supply a "--sparse" flag so
this operation can be carried out successfully.
Helped-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaoxuan Yuan <shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add test for "mv: add check_dir_in_index() and solve general dir check
issue" in this series.
This change tests the following:
1. mv <source> as a directory on the sparse index boundary (where it
would be a sparse directory in a sparse index).
2. mv <source> as a directory which is deeper than the boundary (so
the sparse index would expand in the cache_name_pos() method).
These tests can be written now for correctness, but later the first case
can be updated to use the 'ensure_not_expanded' helper in t1092.
Suggested-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaoxuan Yuan <shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
"sparse-checkout" learns to work well with the sparse-index
feature.
* ds/sparse-sparse-checkout:
sparse-checkout: integrate with sparse index
p2000: add test for 'git sparse-checkout [add|set]'
sparse-index: complete partial expansion
sparse-index: partially expand directories
sparse-checkout: --no-sparse-index needs a full index
cache-tree: implement cache_tree_find_path()
sparse-index: introduce partially-sparse indexes
sparse-index: create expand_index()
t1092: stress test 'git sparse-checkout set'
t1092: refactor 'sparse-index contents' test
|
|
When modifying the sparse-checkout definition, the sparse-checkout
builtin calls update_sparsity() to modify the SKIP_WORKTREE bits of all
cache entries in the index. Before, we needed the index to be fully
expanded in order to ensure we had the full list of files necessary that
match the new patterns.
Insert a call to reset_sparse_directories() that expands sparse
directories that are within the new pattern list, but only far enough
that every necessary file path now exists as a cache entry. The
remaining logic within update_sparsity() will modify the SKIP_WORKTREE
bits appropriately.
This allows us to disable command_requires_full_index within the
sparse-checkout builtin. Add tests that demonstrate that we are not
expanding to a full index unnecessarily.
We can see the improved performance in the p2000 test script:
Test HEAD~1 HEAD
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000.24: git ... (sparse-v3) 2.14(1.55+0.58) 1.57(1.03+0.53) -26.6%
2000.25: git ... (sparse-v4) 2.20(1.62+0.57) 1.58(0.98+0.59) -28.2%
These reductions of 26-28% are small compared to most examples, but the
time is dominated by writing a new copy of the base repository to the
worktree and then deleting it again. The fact that the previous index
expansion was such a large portion of the time is telling how important
it is to complete this sparse index integration.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The 'sparse-index contents' test checks that the sparse index has the
correct set of sparse directories in the index after modifying the cone
mode patterns using 'git sparse-checkout set'. Add to the coverage here
by adding more complicated scenarios that were not previously tested.
In order to check paths that do not exist at HEAD, we need to modify the
test_sparse_checkout_set helper slightly:
1. Add the --skip-checks argument to the 'set' command to avoid failures
when passing paths that do not exist at HEAD.
2. When looking for the non-existence of sparse directories for the
paths in $CONE_DIRS, allow the rev-list command to fail because the
path does not exist at HEAD.
This allows us to add some interesting test cases.
Helped-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Before expanding this test with more involved cases, first extract the
repeated logic into a new test_sparse_checkout_set helper. This helper
checks that 'git sparse-checkout set ...' succeeds and then verifies
that certain directories have sparse directory entries in the sparse
index. It also verifies that the in-cone directories are _not_ sparse
directory entries in the sparse index.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
"git show :<path>" learned to work better with the sparse-index
feature.
* ds/sparse-colon-path:
rev-parse: integrate with sparse index
object-name: diagnose trees in index properly
object-name: reject trees found in the index
show: integrate with the sparse index
t1092: add compatibility tests for 'git show'
|
|
When unpacking trees, set the default sparsity of the resultant index based
on repo settings and 'is_sparse_index_allowed()'.
Normally, when executing 'unpack_trees', the output index is marked sparse
when (and only when) it unpacks a sparse directory. However, an index may be
"sparse" even if it contains no sparse directories - when all files fall
inside the sparse-checkout definition or otherwise have SKIP_WORKTREE
disabled. Therefore, the output index may be marked "full" even when it is
"sparse", resulting in unnecessary 'ensure_full_index' calls when writing to
disk. Avoid this by setting the "default" index sparsity to match what is
expected for the repository.
As a consequence of this fix, the (non-merge) 'read-tree' performed when
applying a stash with untracked files no longer expands the index. Update
the corresponding test in 't1092'.
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Update 'stash' to use 'merge_ort_nonrecursive()' to apply a stash to the
current working tree. When 'git stash apply' was converted from its shell
script implementation to a builtin in 8a0fc8d19d (stash: convert apply to
builtin, 2019-02-25), 'merge_recursive_generic()' was used to merge a stash
into the working tree as part of 'git stash (apply|pop)'. However, with the
single merge base used in 'do_apply_stash()', the commit wrapping done by
'merge_recursive_generic()' is not only unnecessary, but misleading (the
*real* merge base is labeled "constructed merge base"). Therefore, a
non-recursive merge of the working tree, stashed tree, and stash base tree
is more appropriate.
There are two options for a non-recursive merge-then-update-worktree
function: 'merge_trees()' and 'merge_ort_nonrecursive()'. Use
'merge_ort_nonrecursive()' to align with the default merge strategy used by
'git merge' (6a5fb96672 (Change default merge backend from recursive to ort,
2021-08-04)) and, because merge-ort does not operate in-place on the index,
avoid unnecessary index expansion. Update tests in 't1092' verifying index
expansion for 'git stash' accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When the index read in 'do_read_index()' does not exist on-disk, mark the
index "sparse" if the executing command does not require a full index and
sparse index is otherwise enabled.
Some commands (such as 'git stash -u') implicitly create a new index (when
the 'GIT_INDEX_FILE' variable points to a non-existent file) and perform
some operation on it. However, when this index is created, it isn't created
with the same sparsity settings as the repo index. As a result, while these
indexes may be sparse during the operation, they are always expanded before
being written to disk. We can avoid that expansion by defaulting the index
to "sparse", in which case it will only be expanded if the full index is
needed.
Note that the function 'set_new_index_sparsity()' is created despite having
only a single caller because additional callers will be added in a
subsequent patch.
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Enable sparse index in 'git stash' by disabling
'command_requires_full_index'.
With sparse index enabled, some subcommands of 'stash' work without
expanding the index, e.g., 'git stash', 'git stash list', 'git stash drop',
etc. Others ensure the index is expanded either directly (as in the case of
'git stash [pop|apply]', where the call to 'merge_recursive_generic()' in
'do_apply_stash()' triggers the expansion), or in a command called
internally by stash (e.g., 'git update-index' in 'git stash -u'). So, in
addition to enabling sparse index, add tests to 't1092' demonstrating which
variants of 'git stash' expand the index, and which do not.
Finally, add the option to skip writing 'untracked.txt' in
'ensure_not_expanded', and use that option to successfully apply stashed
untracked files without a conflict in 'untracked.txt'.
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add tests verifying expected 'git stash' behavior in
't1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility'. These cases establish the expected
behavior of 'git stash' in a sparse-checkout and verify consistency both
with and without a sparse index. Although no sparse index compatibility has
been integrated into 'git stash' yet, the tests are all 'expect_success' -
we don't want the cone-mode sparse-checkout behavior to change depending on
whether it is using a sparse index or not. Therefore, we expect these tests
to continue passing once sparse index is integrated with 'git stash'.
Additionally, add performance test cases for 'git stash' both with and
without untracked files. Note that, unlike the other tests in
'p2000-sparse-operations.sh', the tests added for 'stash' are combination
operations. This is done to ensure the stash/unstash is not blocked by the
modification of '$SPARSE_CONE/a' performed as part of 'test_perf_on_all'.
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
It is not obvious that the 'git rev-parse' builtin would use the sparse
index, but it is possible to parse paths out of the index using the
":<path>" syntax. The 'git rev-parse' output is only the OID of the
object found at that location, but otherwise behaves similarly to 'git
show :<path>'. This includes the failure conditions on directories and
the error messages depending on whether a path is in the worktree or
not.
The only code change required is to change the
command_requires_full_index setting in builtin/rev-parse.c, and we can
re-use many existing 'git show' tests for the rev-parse case.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When running 'git show :<path>' where '<path>' is a directory, then
there is a subtle difference between a full checkout and a sparse
checkout. The error message from diagnose_invalid_index_path() reports
whether the path is on disk or not. The full checkout will have the
directory on disk, but the path will not be in the index. The sparse
checkout could have the directory not exist, specifically when that
directory is outside of the sparse-checkout cone.
In the case of a sparse index, we have yet another state: the path can
be a sparse directory in the index. In this case, the error message from
diagnose_invalid_index_path() would erroneously say "path '<path>' is in
the index, but not at stage 0", which is false.
Add special casing around sparse directory entries so we get to the
correct error message. This requires two checks in order to get parity
with the normal sparse-checkout case.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The get_oid_with_context_1() method is used when parsing revision
arguments. One particular case is to take a ":<path>" string and search
the index for the given path.
In the case of a sparse index, this might find a sparse directory entry,
in which case the contained object is a tree. In the case of a full
index, this search within the index would fail.
In order to maintain identical return state as in a full index, inspect
the discovered cache entry to see if it is a sparse directory and reject
it. This requires being careful around the only_to_die option to be sure
we die only at the correct time.
This changes the behavior of 'git show :<sparse-dir>', but does not
bring it entirely into alignment with a full index case. It specifically
hits the wrong error message within diagnose_invalid_index_path(). That
error message will be corrected in a future change.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The 'git show' command can take an input to request the state of an
object in the index. This can lead to parsing the index in order to load
a specific file entry. Without the change presented here, a sparse index
would expand to a full one, taking much longer than usual to access a
simple file.
There is one behavioral change that happens here, though: we now can
find a sparse directory entry within the index! Commands that previously
failed because we could not find an entry in the worktree or index now
succeed because we _do_ find an entry in the index.
There might be more work to do to make other situations succeed when
looking for an indexed tree, perhaps by looking at or updating the
cache-tree extension as needed. These situations include having a full
index or asking for a directory that is within the sparse-checkout cone
(and hence is not a sparse directory entry in the index).
For now, we demonstrate how the sparse index integration is extremely
simple for files outside of the cone as well as directories within the
cone. A later change will resolve this behavior around sparse
directories.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Correct tracking of the 'cache_bottom' for cases where sparse directories
are present in the index.
BACKGROUND
----------
The 'unpack_trees_options.cache_bottom' is a variable that tracks the
in-progress "bottom" of the cache as 'unpack_trees()' iterates through the
contents of the index. Most importantly, this value informs the sequential
return values of 'next_cache_entry()' which, in the "diff cache" usage of
'unpack_callback()', are either unpacked as-is or are passed into the diff
machinery.
The 'cache_bottom' is intended to track the position of the first entry in
the index that has not yet been diffed or unpacked. It is advanced in two
main ways: either it is incremented when an index entry is marked as "used"
(in 'mark_ce_used()'), indicating that it was unpacked or diffed, or when a
directory is unpacked, in which case it is increased by an amount equaling
the number of index entries inside that tree.
In 17a1bb570b (unpack-trees: preserve cache_bottom, 2021-07-14), it was
identified that sparse directories posed a problem to the above
'cache_bottom' advancement logic - because a sparse directory was both an
index entry that could be "used" and a directory that can be unpacked, the
'cache_bottom' would be incremented too many times. To solve this problem,
the 'mark_ce_used()' advancement of 'cache_bottom' was skipped for sparse
directories.
INCORRECT CACHE_BOTTOM TRACKING
-------------------------------
Skipping the 'cache_bottom' advancement for sparse directories in
'mark_ce_used()' breaks down in two cases:
1. When the 'unpack_trees()' operation is *not* a "cache diff" (because the
directory contents-based incrementing of 'cache_bottom' does not happen).
2. When a cache diff is performed with a pathspec (because
'unpack_index_entry()' will unpack a sparse directory not matched by the
pathspec without performing the directory contents-based increment).
The former luckily does not appear to affect 'git' behavior, likely because
'cache_bottom' is largely unused (non-"cache diff" 'unpack_trees()' uses
'find_index_entry()' - rather than 'next_cache_entry()' - to find the index
entries to unpack).
The latter, however, causes 'cache_bottom' to "lag behind" its intended
position by an amount equal to the number of sparse directories unpacked so
far with 'unpack_index_entry()'. If a repository is structured such that any
sparse directories are ordered lexicographically *after* any
pathspec-matching directories, though, this issue won't present any adverse
behavior.
This was the case with the 't1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh' tests
before the addition of the 'before/' sparse directory (ordered *before* the
in-cone 'deep/' directory), therefore sidestepping the issue. Once the
'before/' directory was added, though, 'cache_bottom' began to lag behind
its intended position, causing 'next_cache_entry()' to return index entries
it had already processed and, ultimately, an incorrect diff.
CORRECTING CACHE_BOTTOM
-----------------------
The problems observed in 't1092' come from 'cache_bottom' lagging behind in
cases where the cache tree-based advancement doesn't occur. To solve this,
then, the fix in 17a1bb570b is "reversed"; rather than skipping
'cache_bottom' advancement in 'mark_ce_used()', we skip the directory
contents-based advancement for sparse directories. Now, every index entry
can be accounted for in 'cache_bottom':
* if you're working with a single index entry, 'cache_bottom' is incremented
in 'mark_ce_used()'
* if you're working with a directory that contains index entries (but is not
one itself), 'cache_bottom' is incremented by the number of entries in
that directory.
Finally, change the 'test_expect_failure' tests in 't1092' failing due to
this bug back to 'test_expect_success'.
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add a sparse directory 'before/' containing files 'a' and 'b' to the test
repo used in 't/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh'. This is meant to
ensure that no sparse index integrations rely on the in-cone path(s) being
lexicographically first in the repo.
Unfortunately, some existing tests do not handle this repo architecture
properly:
* 'add outside sparse cone'
* 'status/add: outside sparse cone'
* 'reset with pathspecs inside sparse definition'
All three of these are due to the incorrect handling of the
'unpack_trees_options.cache_bottom' when performing a cache diff via
'unpack_trees'. This will be corrected in a future patch; in the meantime,
mark the tests with 'test_expect_failure'.
Finally, update the 'ls-files' and 'root directory cannot be sparse' tests
to include the 'before/' directory in their expected index contents.
Co-authored-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
"git read-tree" has been made to be aware of the sparse-index
feature.
* vd/sparse-read-tree:
read-tree: make three-way merge sparse-aware
read-tree: make two-way merge sparse-aware
read-tree: narrow scope of index expansion for '--prefix'
read-tree: integrate with sparse index
read-tree: expand sparse checkout test coverage
read-tree: explicitly disallow prefixes with a leading '/'
status: fix nested sparse directory diff in sparse index
sparse-index: prevent repo root from becoming sparse
|
|
Enable use of 'merged_sparse_dir' in 'threeway_merge'. As with two-way
merge, the contents of each conflicted sparse directory are merged without
referencing the index, avoiding sparse index expansion.
As with two-way merge, the 't/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh' test
'read-tree --merge with edit/edit conflicts in sparse directories' confirms
that three-way merges with edit/edit changes (both with and without
conflicts) inside a sparse directory result in the correct index state or
error message. To ensure the index is not unnecessarily expanded, add
three-way merge cases to 'sparse index is not expanded: read-tree'.
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Enable two-way merge with 'git read-tree' without expanding the sparse
index. When in a sparse index, a two-way merge will trivially succeed as
long as there are not changes to the same sparse directory in multiple trees
(i.e., sparse directory-level "edit-edit" conflicts). If there are such
conflicts, the merge will fail despite the possibility that individual files
could merge cleanly.
In order to resolve these "edit-edit" conflicts, "conflicted" sparse
directories are - rather than rejected - merged by traversing their
associated trees by OID. For each child of the sparse directory:
1. Files are merged as normal (see Documentation/git-read-tree.txt for
details).
2. Subdirectories are treated as sparse directories and merged in
'twoway_merge'. If there are no conflicts, they are merged according to
the rules in Documentation/git-read-tree.txt; otherwise, the subdirectory
is recursively traversed and merged.
This process allows sparse directories to be individually merged at the
necessary depth *without* expanding a full index.
The 't/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh' test 'read-tree --merge with
edit/edit conflicts in sparse directories' tests two-way merges with 1)
changes inside sparse directories that do not conflict and 2) changes that
do conflict (with the correct file(s) reported in the error message).
Additionally, add two-way merge cases to 'sparse index is not expanded:
read-tree' to confirm that the index is not expanded regardless of whether
edit/edit conflicts are present in a sparse directory.
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When 'git read-tree' is provided with a prefix, expand the index only if the
prefix is equivalent to a sparse directory or contained within one. If the
index is not expanded in these cases, 'ce_in_traverse_path' will indicate
that the relevant sparse directory is not in the prefix/traverse path,
skipping past it and not unpacking the appropriate tree(s).
If the prefix is in-cone, its sparse subdirectories (if any) will be
traversed correctly without index expansion.
The behavior of 'git read-tree' with prefixes 1) inside of cone, 2) equal to
a sparse directory, and 3) inside a sparse directory are all tested as part
of the 't/t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh' test 'read-tree --prefix',
ensuring that the sparse index case works the way it did prior to this
change as well as matching non-sparse index sparse-checkout.
Helped-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Enable use of sparse index in 'git read-tree'. The integration in this patch
is limited only to usage of 'read-tree' that does not need additional
functional changes for the sparse index to behave as expected (i.e., produce
the same user-facing results as a non-sparse index sparse-checkout). To
ensure no unexpected behavior occurs, the index is explicitly expanded when:
* '--no-sparse-checkout' is specified (because it disables sparse-checkout)
* '--prefix' is specified (if the prefix is inside a sparse directory, the
prefixed tree cannot be properly traversed)
* two or more <tree-ish> arguments are specified ('twoway_merge' and
'threeway_merge' do not yet support merging sparse directories)
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add tests focused on how 'git read-tree' behaves in sparse checkouts. Extra
emphasis is placed on interactions with files outside the sparse cone, e.g.
merges with out-of-cone conflicts.
Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Enable the 'recursive' diff option for the diff executed as part of 'git
status'. Without the 'recursive' enabled, 'git status' reports index
changes incorrectly when the following conditions were met:
* sparse index is enabled
* there is a difference between the index and HEAD in a file inside a
*subdirectory* of a sparse directory
* the sparse directory index entry is *not* expanded in-core
Because it is not recursive by default, the diff in 'git status' reports
changes only at the level of files and directories that are immediate
children of a sparse directory, rather than recursing into directories with
changes to identify the modified file(s). As a result, 'git status' reports
the immediate subdirectory itself as "modified".
Example:
$ git init
$ mkdir -p sparse/sub
$ echo test >sparse/sub/foo
$ git add .
$ git commit -m "commit 1"
$ echo somethingelse >sparse/sub/foo
$ git add .
$ git commit -a -m "commit 2"
$ git sparse-checkout set --cone --sparse-index 'sparse'
$ git reset --soft HEAD~1
$ git status
On branch master
You are in a sparse checkout.
Changes to be committed:
(use "git restore --staged <file>..." to unstage)
modified: sparse/sub
Enabling the 'recursive' diff option in 'wt_status_collect_changes_index'
corrects this issue by allowing the diff to recurse into subdirectories of
sparse directories to find modified files. Given the same repository setup
as the example above, the corrected result of `git status` is:
$ git status
On branch master
You are in a sparse checkout.
Changes to be committed:
(use "git restore --staged <file>..." to unstage)
modified: sparse/sub/foo
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Prevent the repository root from being collapsed into a sparse directory by
treating an empty path as "inside the sparse-checkout". When collapsing a
sparse index (e.g. in 'git sparse-checkout reapply'), the root directory
typically could not become a sparse directory due to the presence of in-cone
root-level files and directories. However, if no such in-cone files or
directories were present, there was no explicit check signaling that the
"repository root path" (an empty string, in the case of
'convert_to_sparse(...)') was in-cone, and a sparse directory index entry
would be created from the repository root directory.
The documentation in Documentation/git-sparse-checkout.txt explicitly states
that the files in the root directory are expected to be in-cone for a
cone-mode sparse-checkout. Collapsing the root into a sparse directory entry
violates that assumption, as sparse directory entries are expected to be
outside the sparse cone and have SKIP_WORKTREE enabled. This invalid state
in turn causes issues with commands that interact with the index, e.g.
'git status'.
Treating an empty (root) path as in-cone prevents the creation of a root
sparse directory in 'convert_to_sparse(...)'. Because the repository root is
otherwise never compared with sparse patterns (in both cone-mode and
non-cone sparse-checkouts), the new check does not cause additional changes
to how sparse patterns are applied.
Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
"git update-index", "git checkout-index", and "git clean" are
taught to work better with the sparse checkout feature.
* vd/sparse-clean-etc:
update-index: reduce scope of index expansion in do_reupdate
update-index: integrate with sparse index
update-index: add tests for sparse-checkout compatibility
checkout-index: integrate with sparse index
checkout-index: add --ignore-skip-worktree-bits option
checkout-index: expand sparse checkout compatibility tests
clean: integrate with sparse index
reset: reorder wildcard pathspec conditions
reset: fix validation in sparse index test
|
|
The fix is short (~30 lines), but the description is not. Sorry.
There is a set of problems caused by files in what I'll refer to as the
"present-despite-SKIP_WORKTREE" state. This commit aims to not just fix
these problems, but remove the entire class as a possibility -- for
those using sparse checkouts. But first, we need to understand the
problems this class presents. A quick outline:
* Problems
* User facing issues
* Problem space complexity
* Maintenance and code correctness challenges
* SKIP_WORKTREE expectations in Git
* Suggested solution
* Pros/Cons of suggested solution
* Notes on testcase modifications
=== User facing issues ===
There are various ways for users to get files to be present in the
working copy despite having the SKIP_WORKTREE bit set for that file in
the index. This may come from:
* various git commands not really supporting the SKIP_WORKTREE bit[1,2]
* users grabbing files from elsewhere and writing them to the worktree
(perhaps even cached in their editor)
* users attempting to "abort" a sparse-checkout operation with a
not-so-early Ctrl+C (updating $GIT_DIR/info/sparse-checkout and the
working tree is not atomic)[3].
Once users have present-despite-SKIP_WORKTREE files, any modifications
users make to these files will be ignored, possibly to users' confusion.
Further:
* these files will degrade performance for the sparse-index case due
to requiring the index to be expanded (see commit 55dfcf9591
("sparse-checkout: clear tracked sparse dirs", 2021-09-08) for why
we try to delete entire directories outside the sparse cone).
* these files will not be updated by by standard commands
(switch/checkout/pull/merge/rebase will leave them alone unless
conflicts happen -- and even then, the conflicted file may be
written somewhere else to avoid overwriting the SKIP_WORKTREE file
that is present and in the way)
* there is nothing in Git that users can use to discover such
files (status, diff, grep, etc. all ignore it)
* there is no reasonable mechanism to "recover" from such a condition
(neither `git sparse-checkout reapply` nor `git reset --hard` will
correct it).
So, not only are users modifications ignored, but the files get
progressively more stale over time. At some point in the future, they
may change their sparseness specification or disable sparse-checkouts.
At that time, all present-despite-SKIP_WORKTREE files will show up as
having lots of modifications because they represent a version from a
different branch or commit. These might include user-made local changes
from days before, but the only way to tell is to have users look through
them all closely.
If these users come to others for help, there will be no logs that
explain the issue; it's just a mysterious list of changes. Users might
adamantly claim (correctly, as it turns out) that they didn't modify
these files, while others presume they did.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqbmb1a7ga.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BH9tju7WVm=QZDOvaMDdZbpNXrVWQdN-jmfN8wC6YVhmw@mail.gmail.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BFnFpzwGC11TLoLs8YK5yiisA5D5-fFjXnJsbESVDwZsA@mail.gmail.com/
=== Problem space complexity ===
SKIP_WORKTREE has been part of Git for over a decade. Duy did lots of
work on it initially, and several others have since come along and put
lots of work into it. Stolee spent most of 2021 on the sparse-index,
with lots of bugfixes along the way including to non-sparse-index cases
as we are still trying to get sparse checkouts to behave reasonably.
Basically every codepath throughout the treat needs to be aware of an
additional type of file: tracked-but-not-present. The extra type
results in lots of extra testcases and lots of extra code everywhere.
But, the sad thing is that we actually have more than one extra type.
We have tracked, tracked-but-not-present (SKIP_WORKTREE), and
tracked-but-promised-to-not-be-present-but-is-present-anyway
(present-despite-SKIP_WORKTREE). Two types is a monumental amount of
effort to support, and adding a third feels a bit like insanity[4].
[4] Some examples of which can be seen at
https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BGJ_Nvi5TmgriD9Bh6eNXE2EDq2f8e8QKXAeYG3BxZafA@mail.gmail.com/
=== Maintenance and code correctness challenges ===
Matheus' patches to grep stalled for nearly a year, in part because of
complications of how to handle sparse-checkouts appropriately in all
cases[5][6] (with trying to sanely figure out how to sanely handle
present-despite-SKIP_WORKTREE files being one of the complications).
His rm/add follow-ups also took months because of those kinds of
issues[7]. The corner cases with things like submodules and
SKIP_WORKTREE with the addition of present-despite-SKIP_WORKTREE start
becoming really complex[8].
We've had to add ugly logic to merge-ort to attempt to handle
present-despite-SKIP_WORKTREE files[9], and basically just been forced
to give up in merge-recursive knowing full well that we'll sometimes
silently discard user modifications. Despite stash essentially being a
merge, it needed extra code (beyond what was in merge-ort and
merge-recursive) to manually tweak SKIP_WORKTREE bits in order to avoid
a few different bugs that'd result in an early abort with a partial
stash application[10].
[5] See https://lore.kernel.org/git/5f3f7ac77039d41d1692ceae4b0c5df3bb45b74a.1612901326.git.matheus.bernardino@usp.br/#t
and the dates on the thread; also Matheus and I had several
conversations off-list trying to resolve the issues over that time
[6] ...it finally kind of got unstuck after
https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BGJ_Nvi5TmgriD9Bh6eNXE2EDq2f8e8QKXAeYG3BxZafA@mail.gmail.com/
[7] See for example
https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BHwNoVnooqDFPAsZxBT9aR5Dwk5D9sDRCvYSb8akxAJgA@mail.gmail.com/#t
and quotes like "The core functionality of sparse-checkout has always
been only partially implemented", a statement I still believe is true
today.
[8] https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.809.git.git.1592356884310.gitgitgadget@gmail.com/
[9] See commit 66b209b86a ("merge-ort: implement CE_SKIP_WORKTREE
handling with conflicted entries", 2021-03-20)
[10] See commit ba359fd507 ("stash: fix stash application in
sparse-checkouts", 2020-12-01)
=== SKIP_WORKTREE expectations in Git ===
A couple quotes:
* From [11] (before the "sparse-checkout" command existed):
If it needs too many special cases, hacks, and conditionals, then it
is not worth the complexity---if it is easier to write a correct code
by allowing Git to populate working tree files, it is perfectly fine
to do so.
In a sense, the sparse checkout "feature" itself is a hack by itself,
and that is why I think this part should be "best effort" as well.
* From the git-sparse-checkout manual (still present today):
THIS COMMAND IS EXPERIMENTAL. ITS BEHAVIOR, AND THE BEHAVIOR OF OTHER
COMMANDS IN THE PRESENCE OF SPARSE-CHECKOUTS, WILL LIKELY CHANGE IN
THE FUTURE.
[11] https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqbmb1a7ga.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com/
=== Suggested solution ===
SKIP_WORKTREE was written to allow sparse-checkouts, in particular, as
the name of the option implies, to allow the file to NOT be in the
worktree but consider it to be unchanged rather than deleted.
The suggests a simple solution: present-despite-SKIP_WORKTREE files
should not exist, for those using sparse-checkouts.
Enforce this at index loading time by checking if core.sparseCheckout is
true; if so, check files in the index with the SKIP_WORKTREE bit set to
verify that they are absent from the working tree. If they are present,
unset the bit (in memory, though any commands that write to the index
will record the update).
Users can, of course, can get the SKIP_WORKTREE bit back such as by
running `git sparse-checkout reapply` (if they have ensured the file is
unmodified and doesn't match the specified sparsity patterns).
=== Pros/Cons of suggested solution ===
Pros:
* Solves the user visible problems reported above, which I've been
complaining about for nearly a year but couldn't find a solution to.
* Helps prevent slow performance degradation with a sparse-index.
* Much easier behavior in sparse-checkouts for users to reason about
* Very simple, ~30 lines of code.
* Significantly simplifies some ugly testcases, and obviates the need
to test an entire class of potential issues.
* Reduces code complexity, reasoning, and maintenance. Avoids
disagreements about weird corner cases[12].
* It has been reported that some users might be (ab)using
SKIP_WORKTREE as a let-me-modify-but-keep-the-file-in-the-worktree
mechanism[13, and a few other similar references]. These users know
of multiple caveats and shortcomings in doing so; perhaps not
surprising given the "SKIP_WORKTREE expecations" section above.
However, these users use `git update-index --skip-worktree`, and not
`git sparse-checkout` or core.sparseCheckout=true. As such, these
users would be unaffected by this change and can continue abusing
the system as before.
[12] https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BH9tju7WVm=QZDOvaMDdZbpNXrVWQdN-jmfN8wC6YVhmw@mail.gmail.com/
[13] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/13630849/git-difference-between-assume-unchanged-and-skip-worktree
Cons:
* When core.sparseCheckout is enabled, this adds a performance cost to
reading the index. I'll defer discussion of this cost to a subsequent
patch, since I have some optimizations to add.
=== Notes on testcase modifications ===
The good:
* t1011: Compare to two cases above it ('read-tree will not throw away
dirty changes, non-sparse'); since the file is present, it should
match the non-sparse case now
* t1092: sparse-index & sparse-checkout now match full-worktree
behavior in more cases! Yaay for consistency!
* t6428, t7012: look at how much simpler the tests become! Merge and
stash can just fail early telling the user there's a file in the
way, instead of not noticing until it's about to write a file and
then have to implement sudden crash avoidance. Hurray for sanity!
* t7817: sparse behavior better matches full tree behavior. Hurray
for sanity!
The confusing:
* t3705: These changes were ONLY needed on Windows, but they don't
hurt other platforms. Let's discuss each individually:
* core.sparseCheckout should be false by default. Nothing in this
testcase toggles that until many, many tests later. However,
early tests (#5 in particular) were testing `update-index
--skip-worktree` behavior in a non-sparse-checkout, but the
Windows tests in CI were behaving as if core.sparseCheckout=true
had been specified somewhere. I do not have access to a Windows
machine. But I just manually did what should have been a no-op
and turned the config off. And it fixed the test.
* I have no idea why the leftover .gitattributes file from this
test was causing failures for test #18 on Windows, but only with
these changes of mine. Test #18 was checking for empty stderr,
and specifically wanted to know that some error completely
unrelated to file endings did not appear. The leftover
.gitattributes file thus caused some spurious stderr unrelated to
the thing being checked. Since other tests did not intend to
test normalization, just proactively remove the .gitattributes
file. I'm certain this is cleaner and better, I'm just unsure
why/how this didn't trigger problems before.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
* vd/sparse-clean-etc:
update-index: reduce scope of index expansion in do_reupdate
update-index: integrate with sparse index
update-index: add tests for sparse-checkout compatibility
checkout-index: integrate with sparse index
checkout-index: add --ignore-skip-worktree-bits option
checkout-index: expand sparse checkout compatibility tests
clean: integrate with sparse index
reset: reorder wildcard pathspec conditions
reset: fix validation in sparse index test
|
|
Replace unconditional index expansion in 'do_reupdate()' with one scoped to
only where a full index is needed. A full index is only required in
'do_reupdate()' when a sparse directory in the index differs from HEAD; in
that case, the index is expanded and the operation restarted.
Because the index should only be expanded if a sparse directory is modified,
add a test ensuring the index is not expanded when differences only exist
within the sparse cone.
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Enable use of the sparse index with `update-index`. Most variations of
`update-index` work without explicitly expanding the index or making any
other updates in or outside of `update-index.c`.
The one usage requiring additional changes is `--cacheinfo`; if a file
inside a sparse directory was specified, the index would not be expanded
until after the cache tree is invalidated, leading to a mismatch between the
index and cache tree. This scenario is handled by rearranging
`add_index_entry_with_check`, allowing `index_name_stage_pos` to expand the
index *before* attempting to invalidate the relevant cache tree path,
avoiding cache tree/index corruption.
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Introduce tests for a variety of `git update-index` use cases, including
performance scenarios. Tests are intended to exercise `update-index` with
options that change the commands interaction with the index (e.g.,
`--again`) and with files/directories inside and outside a sparse checkout
cone.
Of note is that these tests clearly establish the behavior of `git
update-index --add` with untracked, outside-of-cone files. Unlike `git add`,
which fails with an error when provided with such files, `update-index`
succeeds in adding them to the index. Additionally, the `skip-worktree` flag
is *not* automatically added to the new entry. Although this is pre-existing
behavior, there are a couple of reasons to avoid changing it in favor of
consistency with e.g. `git add`:
* `update-index` is low-level command for modifying the index; while it can
perform operations similar to those of `add`, it traditionally has fewer
"guardrails" preventing a user from doing something they may not want to
do (in this case, adding an outside-of-cone, non-`skip-worktree` file to
the index)
* `update-index` typically only exits with an error code if it is incapable
of performing an operation (e.g., if an internal function call fails);
adding a new file outside the sparse checkout definition is still a valid
operation, albeit an inadvisable one
* `update-index` does not implicitly set flags (e.g., `skip-worktree`) when
creating new index entries with `--add`; if flags need to be updated,
options like `--[no-]skip-worktree` allow a user to intentionally set them
All this to say that, while there are valid reasons to consider changing the
treatment of outside-of-cone files in `update-index`, there are also
sufficient reasons for leaving it as-is.
Co-authored-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
