Welcome to mirror list, hosted at ThFree Co, Russian Federation.

git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git - Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.
summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-11-01leak tests: mark some misc tests as passing with SANITIZE=leakÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
As in 7ff24785cb7 (leak tests: mark some misc tests as passing with SANITIZE=leak, 2021-10-12) continue marking various miscellaneous tests as passing when git is compiled with SANITIZE=leak. They'll now be listed as running under the "GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" test mode (the "linux-leaks" CI target). Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-09-15ls-refs: reject unknown argumentsJeff King
The v2 ls-refs command may receive extra arguments from the client, one per pkt-line. The spec is pretty clear that the arguments must come from a specified set, but we silently ignore any unknown entries. For a well-behaved client this doesn't matter, but it makes testing and debugging more confusing. Let's tighten this up to match the spec. In theory this liberal behavior _could_ be useful for extending the protocol. But: - every other part of the protocol requires that the server first indicate that it supports the argument; this includes the fetch and object-info commands, plus the "unborn" capability added to ls-refs itself - it's not a very good extension mechanism anyway; without the server advertising support, clients would have no idea if the argument was silently ignored, or accepted and simply had no effect So we're not really losing anything by tightening this. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-09-15serve: reject commands used as capabilitiesJeff King
Our table of v2 "capabilities" contains everything we might tell the client we support. But there are differences in how we expect the client to respond. Some of the entries are true capabilities (i.e., we expect the client to say "yes, I support this"), and some are ones we expect them to send as commands (with "command=ls-refs" or similar). When we receive a capability used as a command, we complain about that. But when we receive a command used as a capability (e.g., just "ls-refs" in a pkt-line by itself), we silently ignore it. This isn't really hurting anything (clients shouldn't send it, and we'll ignore it), but we can tighten up the protocol to match what we expect to happen. There are two new tests here. The first one checks a capability used as a command, which already passes. The second tests a command as a capability, which this patch fixes. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-09-15serve: reject bogus v2 "command=ls-refs=foo"Jeff King
When we see a line from the client like "command=ls-refs", we parse everything after the equals sign as a capability, which we check against our capabilities table. If we don't recognize the command (e.g., "command=foo"), we'll reject it. But in parse_command(), we use the same get_capability() parser for parsing non-command lines. So if we see "command=ls-refs=foo", we will feed "ls-refs=foo" to get_capability(), which will say "OK, that's ls-refs, with value 'foo'". But then we simply ignore the value entirely. The client is violating the spec here, which says: command = PKT-LINE("command=" key LF) key = 1*(ALPHA | DIGIT | "-_") I.e., the key is not even allowed to have an equals sign in it. Whereas a real non-command capability does allow a value: capability = PKT-LINE(key[=value] LF) So by reusing the same get_capability() parser, we are mixing up the "key" and "capability" tokens. However, since that parser tells us whether it saw an "=", we can still use it; we just need to reject any input that produces a non-NULL value field. The current behavior isn't really hurting anything (the client should never send such a request, and if it does, we just ignore the "value" part). But since it does violate the spec, let's tighten it up to prevent any surprising behavior. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-09-15ls-refs: ignore very long ref-prefix countsJeff King
Because each "ref-prefix" capability from the client comes in its own pkt-line, there's no limit to the number of them that a misbehaving client may send. We read them all into a strvec, which means the client can waste arbitrary amounts of our memory by just sending us "ref-prefix foo" over and over. One possible solution is to just drop the connection when the limit is reached. If we set it high enough, then only misbehaving or malicious clients would hit it. But "high enough" is vague, and it's unfriendly if we guess wrong and a legitimate client hits this. But we can do better. Since supporting the ref-prefix capability is optional anyway, the client has to further cull the response based on their own patterns. So we can simply ignore the patterns once we cross a certain threshold. Note that we have to ignore _all_ patterns, not just the ones past our limit (since otherwise we'd send too little data). The limit here is fairly arbitrary, and probably much higher than anyone would need in practice. It might be worth limiting it further, if only because we check it linearly (so with "m" local refs and "n" patterns, we do "m * n" string comparisons). But if we care about optimizing this, an even better solution may be a more advanced data structure anyway. I didn't bother making the limit configurable, since it's so high and since Git should behave correctly in either case. It wouldn't be too hard to do, but it makes both the code and documentation more complex. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-05-16Merge branch 'jt/push-negotiation'Junio C Hamano
"git push" learns to discover common ancestor with the receiving end over protocol v2. * jt/push-negotiation: send-pack: support push negotiation fetch: teach independent negotiation (no packfile) fetch-pack: refactor command and capability write fetch-pack: refactor add_haves() fetch-pack: refactor process_acks()
2021-05-05fetch: teach independent negotiation (no packfile)Jonathan Tan
Currently, the packfile negotiation step within a Git fetch cannot be done independent of sending the packfile, even though there is at least one application wherein this is useful. Therefore, make it possible for this negotiation step to be done independently. A subsequent commit will use this for one such application - push negotiation. This feature is for protocol v2 only. (An implementation for protocol v0 would require a separate implementation in the fetch, transport, and transport helper code.) In the protocol, the main hindrance towards independent negotiation is that the server can unilaterally decide to send the packfile. This is solved by a "wait-for-done" argument: the server will then wait for the client to say "done". In practice, the client will never say it; instead it will cease requests once it is satisfied. In the client, the main change lies in the transport and transport helper code. fetch_refs_via_pack() performs everything needed - protocol version and capability checks, and the negotiation itself. There are 2 code paths that do not go through fetch_refs_via_pack() that needed to be individually excluded: the bundle transport (excluded through requiring smart_options, which the bundle transport doesn't support) and transport helpers that do not support takeover. If or when we support independent negotiation for protocol v0, we will need to modify these 2 code paths to support it. But for now, report failure if independent negotiation is requested in these cases. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-04-21object-info: support for retrieving object infoBruno Albuquerque
Sometimes it is useful to get information of an object without having to download it completely. Add the "object-info" capability that lets the client ask for object-related information with their full hexadecimal object names. Only sizes are returned for now. Signed-off-by: Bruno Albuquerque <bga@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-02-18Merge branch 'jt/clone-unborn-head'Junio C Hamano
"git clone" tries to locally check out the branch pointed at by HEAD of the remote repository after it is done, but the protocol did not convey the information necessary to do so when copying an empty repository. The protocol v2 learned how to do so. * jt/clone-unborn-head: clone: respect remote unborn HEAD connect, transport: encapsulate arg in struct ls-refs: report unborn targets of symrefs
2021-02-06ls-refs: report unborn targets of symrefsJonathan Tan
When cloning, we choose the default branch based on the remote HEAD. But if there is no remote HEAD reported (which could happen if the target of the remote HEAD is unborn), we'll fall back to using our local init.defaultBranch. Traditionally this hasn't been a big deal, because most repos used "master" as the default. But these days it is likely to cause confusion if the server and client implementations choose different values (e.g., if the remote started with "main", we may choose "master" locally, create commits there, and then the user is surprised when they push to "master" and not "main"). To solve this, the remote needs to communicate the target of the HEAD symref, even if it is unborn, and "git clone" needs to use this information. Currently, symrefs that have unborn targets (such as in this case) are not communicated by the protocol. Teach Git to advertise and support the "unborn" feature in "ls-refs" (by default, this is advertised, but server administrators may turn this off through the lsrefs.unborn config). This feature indicates that "ls-refs" supports the "unborn" argument; when it is specified, "ls-refs" will send the HEAD symref with the name of its unborn target. This change is only for protocol v2. A similar change for protocol v0 would require independent protocol design (there being no analogous position to signal support for "unborn") and client-side plumbing of the data required, so the scope of this patch set is limited to protocol v2. The client side will be updated to use this in a subsequent commit. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-20t5[6-9]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"Johannes Schindelin
This trick was performed via $ (cd t && sed -i -e 's/master/main/g' -e 's/MASTER/MAIN/g' \ -e 's/Master/Main/g' -- t5[6-9]*.sh) This allows us to define `GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main` for those tests. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-20tests: mark tests relying on the current default for `init.defaultBranch`Johannes Schindelin
In addition to the manual adjustment to let the `linux-gcc` CI job run the test suite with `master` and then with `main`, this patch makes sure that GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME is set in all test scripts that currently rely on the initial branch name being `master by default. To determine which test scripts to mark up, the first step was to force-set the default branch name to `master` in - all test scripts that contain the keyword `master`, - t4211, which expects `t/t4211/history.export` with a hard-coded ref to initialize the default branch, - t5560 because it sources `t/t556x_common` which uses `master`, - t8002 and t8012 because both source `t/annotate-tests.sh` which also uses `master`) This trick was performed by this command: $ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/\(test-lib\|lib-\(bash\|cvs\|git-svn\)\|gitweb-lib\)\.sh$/i\ GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\ export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\ ' $(git grep -l master t/t[0-9]*.sh) \ t/t4211*.sh t/t5560*.sh t/t8002*.sh t/t8012*.sh After that, careful, manual inspection revealed that some of the test scripts containing the needle `master` do not actually rely on a specific default branch name: either they mention `master` only in a comment, or they initialize that branch specificially, or they do not actually refer to the current default branch. Therefore, the aforementioned modification was undone in those test scripts thusly: $ git checkout HEAD -- \ t/t0027-auto-crlf.sh t/t0060-path-utils.sh \ t/t1011-read-tree-sparse-checkout.sh \ t/t1305-config-include.sh t/t1309-early-config.sh \ t/t1402-check-ref-format.sh t/t1450-fsck.sh \ t/t2024-checkout-dwim.sh \ t/t2106-update-index-assume-unchanged.sh \ t/t3040-subprojects-basic.sh t/t3301-notes.sh \ t/t3308-notes-merge.sh t/t3423-rebase-reword.sh \ t/t3436-rebase-more-options.sh \ t/t4015-diff-whitespace.sh t/t4257-am-interactive.sh \ t/t5323-pack-redundant.sh t/t5401-update-hooks.sh \ t/t5511-refspec.sh t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh \ t/t5529-push-errors.sh t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh \ t/t5548-push-porcelain.sh \ t/t5552-skipping-fetch-negotiator.sh \ t/t5572-pull-submodule.sh t/t5608-clone-2gb.sh \ t/t5614-clone-submodules-shallow.sh \ t/t7508-status.sh t/t7606-merge-custom.sh \ t/t9302-fast-import-unpack-limit.sh We excluded one set of test scripts in these commands, though: the range of `git p4` tests. The reason? `git p4` stores the (foreign) remote branch in the branch called `p4/master`, which is obviously not the default branch. Manual analysis revealed that only five of these tests actually require a specific default branch name to pass; They were modified thusly: $ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/lib-git-p4\.sh$/i\ GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\ export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\ ' t/t980[0167]*.sh t/t9811*.sh Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-05-27serve: advertise object-format capability for protocol v2brian m. carlson
In order to communicate the protocol supported by the server side, add support for advertising the object-format capability. We check that the client side sends us an identical algorithm if it sends us its own object-format capability, and assume it speaks SHA-1 if not. In the test, when we're using an algorithm other than SHA-1, we need to specify the algorithm in use so we don't get a failure with an "unknown format" message. Add a test that we handle a mismatched algorithm. Remove the test_oid_init call since it's no longer necessary. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-04-19Turn `git serve` into a test helperJohannes Schindelin
The `git serve` built-in was introduced in ed10cb952d31 (serve: introduce git-serve, 2018-03-15) as a backend to serve Git protocol v2, probably originally intended to be spawned by `git upload-pack`. However, in the version that the protocol v2 patches made it into core Git, `git upload-pack` calls the `serve()` function directly instead of spawning `git serve`; The only reason in life for `git serve` to survive as a built-in command is to provide a way to test the protocol v2 functionality. Meaning that it does not even have to be a built-in that is installed with end-user facing Git installations, but it can be a test helper instead. Let's make it so. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-01-17tests: define GIT_TEST_SIDEBAND_ALLJonathan Tan
Define a GIT_TEST_SIDEBAND_ALL environment variable meant to be used from tests. When set to true, this overrides uploadpack.allowsidebandall to true, allowing the entire test suite to be run as if this configuration is in place for all repositories. As of this patch, all tests pass whether GIT_TEST_SIDEBAND_ALL is unset or set to 1. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-16Merge branch 'md/test-cleanup'Junio C Hamano
Various test scripts have been updated for style and also correct handling of exit status of various commands. * md/test-cleanup: tests: order arguments to git-rev-list properly t9109: don't swallow Git errors upstream of pipes tests: don't swallow Git errors upstream of pipes t/*: fix ordering of expected/observed arguments tests: standardize pipe placement Documentation: add shell guidelines t/README: reformat Do, Don't, Keep in mind lists
2018-10-07t/*: fix ordering of expected/observed argumentsMatthew DeVore
Fix various places where the ordering was obviously wrong, meaning it was easy to find with grep. Signed-off-by: Matthew DeVore <matvore@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-09-11t/helper: merge test-pkt-line into test-toolNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-05-30Merge branch 'jt/partial-clone-proto-v2'Junio C Hamano
Transfer protocol v2 learned to support the partial clone. * jt/partial-clone-proto-v2: {fetch,upload}-pack: support filter in protocol v2 upload-pack: read config when serving protocol v2 upload-pack: fix error message typo
2018-05-02upload-pack: fix error message typoJonathan Tan
Fix a typo in an error message. Also, this line was introduced in 3145ea957d2c ("upload-pack: introduce fetch server command", 2018-03-15), which did not contain a test for the case which causes this error to be printed, so introduce a test. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-04-24serve: introduce the server-option capabilityBrandon Williams
Introduce the "server-option" capability to protocol version 2. This enables future clients the ability to send server specific options in command requests when using protocol version 2. Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-03-15fetch-pack: perform a fetch using v2Brandon Williams
When communicating with a v2 server, perform a fetch by requesting the 'fetch' command. Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-03-15upload-pack: introduce fetch server commandBrandon Williams
Introduce the 'fetch' server command. Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-03-15ls-refs: introduce ls-refs server commandBrandon Williams
Introduce the ls-refs server command. In protocol v2, the ls-refs command is used to request the ref advertisement from the server. Since it is a command which can be requested (as opposed to mandatory in v1), a client can sent a number of parameters in its request to limit the ref advertisement based on provided ref-prefixes. Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-03-15serve: introduce git-serveBrandon Williams
Introduce git-serve, the base server for protocol version 2. Protocol version 2 is intended to be a replacement for Git's current wire protocol. The intention is that it will be a simpler, less wasteful protocol which can evolve over time. Protocol version 2 improves upon version 1 by eliminating the initial ref advertisement. In its place a server will export a list of capabilities and commands which it supports in a capability advertisement. A client can then request that a particular command be executed by providing a number of capabilities and command specific parameters. At the completion of a command, a client can request that another command be executed or can terminate the connection by sending a flush packet. Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>