| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
v1.6.1 introduced ".have" extension to the protocol to allow the receiving
side to advertise objects that are reachable from refs in the repositories
it borrows from. This was meant to be used by the sending side to avoid
sending such objects; they are already available through the alternates
mechanism.
The client side implementation in v1.6.1, which was introduced with
40c155f (push: prepare sender to receive extended ref information from the
receiver, 2008-09-09) aka v1.6.1-rc1~203^2~1, were faulty in that it did
not consider the possiblity that the repository receiver borrows from
might have objects it does not know about.
This fixes it by refraining from passing missing commits to underlying
pack-objects. Revision machinery may need to be tightened further to
treat missing uninteresting objects as non-error events, but this is an
obvious and safe fix for a maintenance release that is almost good enough.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
* cb/maint-unpack-trees-absense:
unpack-trees: remove redundant path search in verify_absent
unpack-trees: fix path search bug in verify_absent
unpack-trees: handle failure in verify_absent
|
|
* tr/maint-no-index-fixes:
diff --no-index -q: fix endless loop
diff --no-index: test for pager after option parsing
diff: accept -- when using --no-index
|
|
* js/add-not-submodule:
git add: do not add files from a submodule
|
|
All the other config variables use CamelCase. This config variable should
not be an exception.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The function lock_remote() sends MKCOL requests to make leading
directories; However, if it does not put a forward slash '/' at the end of
the path, the server sends a 301 redirect.
By leaving the '/' in place, we can avoid this additional step.
Incidentally, at least one version of Curl (7.16.3) does not resend
credentials when it follows a 301 redirect, so this commit also fixes
a bug.
Original patch by Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com>.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
* maint-1.6.0:
t3404: Add test case for auto-amending only edited commits after "edit"
t3404: Add test case for aborted --continue after "edit"
t3501: check that commits are actually done
|
|
Add a test case for the bugfix introduced by commit c14c3c82d
"git-rebase--interactive: auto amend only edited commit".
Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add a test case for the bugfix introduced by commit 8beb1f33d
"git-rebase-interactive: do not squash commits on abort".
Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The basic idea of t3501 is to check whether revert
and cherry-pick works on renamed files.
But as there is no pure cherry-pick/revert test, it is
good to also check if commits are actually done in that
scenario.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
* maint-1.6.0:
fix handling of multiple untracked files for git mv -k
add test cases for "git mv -k"
|
|
Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The "-k" option to "git mv" should allow specifying multiple untracked
files. Currently, multiple untracked files raise an assertion if they
appear consecutively as arguments. Fix this by decrementing the loop
index after removing one entry from the array of arguments.
Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add test cases for ignoring nonexisting and untracked files using the -k
option to "git mv". There is one known breakage related to multiple
untracked files specfied as consecutive arguments.
Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
* js/maint-merge-recursive-r-d-conflict:
merge-recursive: mark rename/delete conflict as unmerged
|
|
* cb/maint-merge-recursive-fix:
merge-recursive: do not clobber untracked working tree garbage
modify/delete conflict resolution overwrites untracked file
Conflicts:
builtin-merge-recursive.c
|
|
* ap/maint-apply-modefix:
builtin-apply: prevent non-explicit permission changes
|
|
* jc/maint-do-not-switch-to-non-commit:
git checkout: do not allow switching to a tree-ish that is not a commit
|
|
Accept -- as an "end of options" marker even when using --no-index.
Previously, the -- triggered a "normal" index/tree diff and subsequently
failed because of the unrecognized (in that mode) --no-index.
Note that the second loop can treat '--' as a normal option, because
the preceding checks ensure it is the third-to-last argument.
While at it, fix the parsing of "-q" option in --no-index mode as well.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Commit 0cf73755 (unpack-trees.c: assume submodules are clean during
check-out) changed an argument to verify_absent from 'path' to 'ce',
which is however shadowed by a local variable of the same name.
The bug triggers if verify_absent is used on a tree entry, for which
the index contains one or more subsequent directories of the same
length. The affected subdirectories are removed from the index. The
testcase included in this commit bisects to 55218834 (checkout: do not
lose staged removal), which reveals the bug in this case, but is
otherwise unrelated.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Commit 203a2fe1 (Allow callers of unpack_trees() to handle failure)
changed the "die on error" behavior to "return failure code".
verify_absent did not handle errors returned by
verify_clean_subdirectory, however.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
It comes quite as a surprise to an unsuspecting Git user that calling
"git add submodule/file" (which is a mistake, alright) _removes_
the submodule in the index, and adds the file. Instead, complain loudly.
While at it, be nice when the user said "git add submodule/" which is
most likely the consequence of tab-completion, and stage the submodule,
instead of trying to add the contents of that directory.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
"git checkout -b newbranch $commit^{tree}" mistakenly created a new branch
rooted at the current HEAD, because in that case, the two structure fields
used to see if the command was invoked without any argument (hence it
needs to default to checking out the HEAD) were populated incorrectly.
Upon seeing a command line argument that we took as a rev, we should store
that string in new.name, even if that does not name a commit. This will
correctly trigger the existing safety logic.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
|
|
A git patch that does not change the executable bit records the mode bits
on its "index" line. "git apply" used to interpret this mode exactly the
same way as it interprets the mode recorded on "new mode" line, as the
wish by the patch submitter to set the mode to the one recorded on the
line.
The reason the mode does not agree between the submitter and the receiver
in the first place is because there is _another_ commit that only appears
on one side but not the other since their histories diverged, and that
commit changes the mode. The patch has "index" line but not "new mode"
line because its change is about updating the contents without affecting
the mode. The application of such a patch is an explicit wish by the
submitter to only cherry-pick the commit that updates the contents without
cherry-picking the commit that modifies the mode. Viewed this way, the
current behaviour is problematic, even though the command does warn when
the mode of the path being patched does not match this mode, and a careful
user could detect this inconsistencies between the patch submitter and the
patch receiver.
This changes the semantics of the mode recorded on the "index" line;
instead of interpreting it as the submitter's wish to set the mode to the
recorded value, it merely informs what the mode submitter happened to
have, and the presense of the "index" line is taken as submitter's wish to
keep whatever the mode is on the receiving end.
This is based on the patch originally done by Alexander Potashev with a
minor fix; the tests are mine.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
* sp/maint-describe-all-tag-warning:
describe: Avoid unnecessary warning when using --all
|
|
In 212945d4 ("Teach git-describe to verify annotated tag names
before output") git-describe learned how to output a warning if
an annotated tag object was matched but its internal name doesn't
match the local ref name.
However, "git describe --all" causes the local ref name to be
prefixed with "tags/", so we need to skip over this prefix before
comparing the local ref name with the name recorded inside of the
tag object.
Patch-by: René Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When a file was renamed in one branch, but deleted in the other, one
should expect the index to contain an unmerged entry, namely the
target of the rename. Make it so.
Noticed by Constantine Plotnikov.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
* js/rebase-i-p:
rebase -i -p: leave a --cc patch when a merge could not be redone
rebase -i -p: Fix --continue after a merge could not be redone
Show a failure of rebase -p if the merge had a conflict
|
|
The result is easier to review this way, and the merge resolution has to be
done inside the work tree, not by adjusting "the patch" anyway.
|
|
Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
We cleaned up lockfiles upon receiving the usual suspects HUP, TERM, QUIT
but a wicked user could kill us of asphyxiation by piping our output to a
pipe that does not read. Protect ourselves by catching SIGPIPE and clean
up the lockfiles as well in such a case.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
I want directories of my working tree to be linked to from various
paths on my filesystem where third-party components expect them, both
in development and production environments. A build system's install
step could solve this, but I develop scripts and web pages that don't
need to be built. Git's submodule system could solve this, but we
tend to develop, branch, and test those directories all in unison, so
one big repository feels more natural. We prefer to edit and commit
on the symlinked paths, not the canonical ones, and in that setting,
"git pull" fails to find the top-level directory of the repository
while other commands work fine.
"git pull" fails because POSIX shells have a notion of current working
directory that is different from getcwd(). The shell stores this path
in PWD. As a result, "cd ../" can be interpreted differently in a
shell script than chdir("../") in a C program. The shell interprets
"../" by essentially stripping the last textual path component from
PWD, whereas C chdir() follows the ".." link in the current directory
on the filesystem. When PWD is a symlink, these are different
destinations. As a result, Git's C commands find the correct
top-level working tree, and shell scripts do not.
Changes:
* When interpreting a relative upward (../) path in cd_to_toplevel,
prepend the cwd without symlinks, given by /bin/pwd
* Add tests for cd_to_toplevel and "git pull" in a symlinked
directory that failed before this fix, plus contrasting scenarios
that already worked
Signed-off-by: Marcel M. Cary <marcel@oak.homeunix.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When a merge that has a conflict was rebased, then rebase stopped to let
the user resolve the conflicts. However, thereafter --continue failed
because the author-script was not saved. (This is rebase -i's way to
preserve a commit's authorship.) This fixes it by doing taking the same
failure route after a merge that is also taken after a normal cherry-pick.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
This extends t3409-rebase-preserve-merges by a case where the merge that
is rebased has a conflict. Therefore, the rebase stops and expects that
the user resolves the conflict. However, currently rebase --continue
fails because .git/rebase-merge/author-script is missing.
The test script had allocated two identical clones, but only one of them
(clone2) was used. Now we use both as indicated in the comment. Also,
two instances of && was missing in the setup part.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Even though newer Porcelain tools always record the tagger information
when creating new tags, export/import pair should be able to faithfully
reproduce ancient tag objects that lack tagger information.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Acked-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
|
|
When no tagger was found (old Git produced tags like this),
no "tagger" line is printed (but this is incompatible with the current
git fast-import).
Alternatively, you can pass the option --fake-missing-tagger, forcing
fast-export to fake a tagger
Unspecified Tagger <no-tagger>
with a tag date of the beginning of (Unix) time in the case of a missing
tagger, so that fast-import is still able to import the result.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add a test which checks that negated patterns such as "!foo.html" can
override previous patterns such as "*.html". This is documented
behaviour but had not been tested so far.
Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
* maint:
fast-import: close pack before unlinking it
pager: do not dup2 stderr if it is already redirected
git-show: do not segfault when showing a bad tag
|
|
When merge-recursive wanted to create a new file in the work tree (either
as the final result, or a hint for reference purposes while delete/modify
conflicts), it unconditionally overwrote an untracked file in the working
tree. Be careful not to lose whatever the user has that is not tracked.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
If a file was removed in HEAD, but modified in MERGE_HEAD, recursive merge
will result in a "CONFLICT (delete/modify)". If the (now untracked) file
already exists and was not added to the index, it is overwritten with the
conflict resolution contents.
In similar situations (cf. test 2), the merge would abort with
"error: Untracked working tree 'file' would be overwritten by merge."
The same should happen in this case.
Signed-off-by: Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When a tag points at a bad or nonexistent object, we should diagnose the
breakage and exit. An earlier commit 4f3dcc2 (Fix 'git show' on signed
tag of signed tag of commit, 2008-07-01) lost this check and made it
segfault instead; not good.
This fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
In dc871831(Only use GIT_CONFIG in "git config", not other programs),
GIT_CONFIG_LOCAL was rested in peace, in favor of not reading
/etc/gitconfig and $HOME/.gitconfig at all when GIT_CONFIG is set.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Make it easier to recover from a mistaken branch deletion by displaying the
sha1 of the branch's tip commit.
Update t3200 test to match the change in output.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When I tweaked the patch to use $SHELL_PATH instead of a hard-coded
"#!/bin/sh" to produce 3aa1f7c (diff: respect textconv in rewrite diffs,
2008-12-09), I screwed up. This should fix it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
* maint:
work around Python warnings from AsciiDoc
git-svn: Make following parents atomic
|
|
Currently we just skip rewrite diffs for binary files; this
patch makes an exception for files which will be textconv'd,
and actually performs the textconv before generating the
diff.
Conceptually, rewrite diffs should be in the exact same
format as the a non-rewrite diff, except that we refuse to
share any context. Thus it makes very little sense for "git
diff" to show a textconv'd diff, but for "git diff -B" to
show "Binary files differ".
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The current emit_rewrite_diff code always writes a text patch without
checking whether the content is binary. This means that if you end up with
a rewrite diff for a binary file, you get lots of raw binary goo in your
patch.
Instead, if we have binary files, then let's just skip emit_rewrite_diff
altogether. We will already have shown the "dissimilarity index" line, so
it is really about the diff contents. If binary diffs are turned off, the
"Binary files a/file and b/file differ" message should be the same in
either case. If we do have binary patches turned on, there isn't much
point in making a less-efficient binary patch that does a total rewrite;
no human is going to read it, and since binary patches don't apply with
any fuzz anyway, the result of application should be the same.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
find_parent_branch generates branch@rev type branches when one has to
look back through SVN history to properly get the history for a branch
copied from somewhere not already being tracked by git-svn. If in the
process of fetching this history, git-svn is interrupted, then when one
fetches again, it will use whatever was last fetched as the parent
commit and fail to fetch any more history which it didn't get to before
being terminated. This is especially troubling in that different
git-svn copies of the same SVN repository can end up with different
commit sha1s, incorrectly showing the history as divergent and
precluding easy collaboration using git push and fetch.
To fix this, when we initialise the Git::SVN object $gs to search for
and perhaps fetch history, we check if there are any commits in SVN in
the range between the current revision $gs is at, and the top revision
for which we were asked to fill history. If there are commits we're
missing in that range, we continue the fetch from the current revision
to the top, properly getting all history before using it as the parent
for the branch we're trying to create.
Signed-off-by: Deskin Miller <deskinm@umich.edu>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
