From fdcdb778551b904d57c127d9a3546f6a7c8792d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Waldek Maleska Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 14:15:33 +0100 Subject: Correct fscanf formatting string for I64u values This fix is probably purely cosmetic because PRIuMAX is likely identical to SCNuMAX. Nevertheless, when using a function of the scanf() family, the correct interpolation to use is the latter, not the former. Signed-off-by: Waldek Maleska Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano --- builtin/gc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'builtin/gc.c') diff --git a/builtin/gc.c b/builtin/gc.c index 005adbebea..9023aee23c 100644 --- a/builtin/gc.c +++ b/builtin/gc.c @@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static const char *lock_repo_for_gc(int force, pid_t* ret_pid) * running. */ time(NULL) - st.st_mtime <= 12 * 3600 && - fscanf(fp, "%"PRIuMAX" %127c", &pid, locking_host) == 2 && + fscanf(fp, "%"SCNuMAX" %127c", &pid, locking_host) == 2 && /* be gentle to concurrent "gc" on remote hosts */ (strcmp(locking_host, my_host) || !kill(pid, 0) || errno == EPERM); if (fp != NULL) -- cgit v1.2.3