From 1b14d40b385580a366c92f8c2a9373e6fd7cb26f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Sunshine Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 02:30:44 -0400 Subject: worktree: give "should be pruned?" function more meaningful name Readers of the name prune_worktree() are likely to expect the function to actually prune a worktree, however, it only answers the question "should this worktree be pruned?". Give it a name more reflective of its true purpose to avoid such confusion. Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano --- builtin/worktree.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'builtin/worktree.c') diff --git a/builtin/worktree.c b/builtin/worktree.c index 27325f42c5..0402f244ea 100644 --- a/builtin/worktree.c +++ b/builtin/worktree.c @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static void delete_worktrees_dir_if_empty(void) rmdir(git_path("worktrees")); /* ignore failed removal */ } -static int prune_worktree(const char *id, struct strbuf *reason) +static int should_prune_worktree(const char *id, struct strbuf *reason) { struct stat st; char *path; @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static void prune_worktrees(void) if (is_dot_or_dotdot(d->d_name)) continue; strbuf_reset(&reason); - if (!prune_worktree(d->d_name, &reason)) + if (!should_prune_worktree(d->d_name, &reason)) continue; if (show_only || verbose) printf_ln(_("Removing %s/%s: %s"), -- cgit v1.2.3