diff options
| author | Ghostkeeper <rubend@tutanota.com> | 2022-07-04 10:25:14 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ghostkeeper <rubend@tutanota.com> | 2022-07-04 10:25:39 +0300 |
| commit | 2a4c8aa3fd24325e57fa339cb5ed7eb6caf3fb1a (patch) | |
| tree | 98f5fb7097c5b7e135c8f6c1fa32802d21ba38ef /resources/definitions | |
| parent | 6df50724436298731acf985b2920b56df1dccba7 (diff) | |
Set default for 3rd-party printers to Inside-Out
Overwhelmingly in our community it seems that the overhang and seam quality is better when printing inside-out.
Ultimaker found that the quality is better (in particular the dimensional accuracy) when printing outside-in. So let them have it outside-in and the rest inside-out.
Made after experimental evidence on Reddit (and in the past on Github).
Diffstat (limited to 'resources/definitions')
| -rw-r--r-- | resources/definitions/fdmprinter.def.json | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | resources/definitions/ultimaker.def.json | 3 |
2 files changed, 4 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/resources/definitions/fdmprinter.def.json b/resources/definitions/fdmprinter.def.json index c33723ddfd..d8f6ad05cd 100644 --- a/resources/definitions/fdmprinter.def.json +++ b/resources/definitions/fdmprinter.def.json @@ -1190,7 +1190,7 @@ "inside_out": "Inside To Outside", "outside_in": "Outside To Inside" }, - "default_value": "outside_in", + "default_value": "inside_out", "settable_per_mesh": true }, "alternate_extra_perimeter": diff --git a/resources/definitions/ultimaker.def.json b/resources/definitions/ultimaker.def.json index c5352f60ef..1d6accfd3c 100644 --- a/resources/definitions/ultimaker.def.json +++ b/resources/definitions/ultimaker.def.json @@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ "infill_material_flow": { "value": "(1.95-infill_sparse_density / 100 if infill_sparse_density > 95 else 1) * material_flow" }, + "inset_direction": { + "value": "'outside_in'" + }, "retraction_combing": { "value": "'no_outer_surfaces'" }, |