//===- Dominance.cpp - Dominator analysis for CFGs ------------------------===// // // Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. // See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception // //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// // // Implementation of dominance related classes and instantiations of extern // templates. // //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// #include "mlir/IR/Dominance.h" #include "mlir/IR/Operation.h" #include "mlir/IR/RegionKindInterface.h" #include "llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h" #include "llvm/Support/GenericDomTreeConstruction.h" using namespace mlir; using namespace mlir::detail; template class llvm::DominatorTreeBase; template class llvm::DominatorTreeBase; template class llvm::DomTreeNodeBase; //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// // DominanceInfoBase //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// template DominanceInfoBase::~DominanceInfoBase() { for (auto entry : dominanceInfos) delete entry.second.getPointer(); } /// Return the dom tree and "hasSSADominance" bit for the given region. The /// DomTree will be null for single-block regions. This lazily constructs the /// DomTree on demand when needsDomTree=true. template auto DominanceInfoBase::getDominanceInfo(Region *region, bool needsDomTree) const -> llvm::PointerIntPair { // Check to see if we already have this information. auto itAndInserted = dominanceInfos.insert({region, {nullptr, true}}); auto &entry = itAndInserted.first->second; // This method builds on knowledge that multi-block regions always have // SSADominance. Graph regions are only allowed to be single-block regions, // but of course single-block regions may also have SSA dominance. if (!itAndInserted.second) { // We do have it, so we know the 'hasSSADominance' bit is correct, but we // may not have constructed a DominatorTree yet. If we need it, build it. if (needsDomTree && !entry.getPointer() && !region->hasOneBlock()) { auto *domTree = new DomTree(); domTree->recalculate(*region); entry.setPointer(domTree); } return entry; } // Nope, lazily construct it. Create a DomTree if this is a multi-block // region. if (!region->hasOneBlock()) { auto *domTree = new DomTree(); domTree->recalculate(*region); entry.setPointer(domTree); // Multiblock regions always have SSA dominance, leave `second` set to true. return entry; } // Single block regions have a more complicated predicate. if (Operation *parentOp = region->getParentOp()) { if (!parentOp->isRegistered()) { // We don't know about unregistered ops. entry.setInt(false); } else if (auto regionKindItf = dyn_cast(parentOp)) { // Registered ops can opt-out of SSA dominance with // RegionKindInterface. entry.setInt(regionKindItf.hasSSADominance(region->getRegionNumber())); } } return entry; } /// Return the ancestor block enclosing the specified block. This returns null /// if we reach the top of the hierarchy. static Block *getAncestorBlock(Block *block) { if (Operation *ancestorOp = block->getParentOp()) return ancestorOp->getBlock(); return nullptr; } /// Walks up the list of containers of the given block and calls the /// user-defined traversal function for every pair of a region and block that /// could be found during traversal. If the user-defined function returns true /// for a given pair, traverseAncestors will return the current block. Nullptr /// otherwise. template static Block *traverseAncestors(Block *block, const FuncT &func) { do { // Invoke the user-defined traversal function for each block. if (func(block)) return block; } while ((block = getAncestorBlock(block))); return nullptr; } /// Tries to update the given block references to live in the same region by /// exploring the relationship of both blocks with respect to their regions. static bool tryGetBlocksInSameRegion(Block *&a, Block *&b) { // If both block do not live in the same region, we will have to check their // parent operations. Region *aRegion = a->getParent(); Region *bRegion = b->getParent(); if (aRegion == bRegion) return true; // Iterate over all ancestors of `a`, counting the depth of `a`. If one of // `a`s ancestors are in the same region as `b`, then we stop early because we // found our NCA. size_t aRegionDepth = 0; if (Block *aResult = traverseAncestors(a, [&](Block *block) { ++aRegionDepth; return block->getParent() == bRegion; })) { a = aResult; return true; } // Iterate over all ancestors of `b`, counting the depth of `b`. If one of // `b`s ancestors are in the same region as `a`, then we stop early because // we found our NCA. size_t bRegionDepth = 0; if (Block *bResult = traverseAncestors(b, [&](Block *block) { ++bRegionDepth; return block->getParent() == aRegion; })) { b = bResult; return true; } // Otherwise we found two blocks that are siblings at some level. Walk the // deepest one up until we reach the top or find an NCA. while (true) { if (aRegionDepth > bRegionDepth) { a = getAncestorBlock(a); --aRegionDepth; } else if (aRegionDepth < bRegionDepth) { b = getAncestorBlock(b); --bRegionDepth; } else { break; } } // If we found something with the same level, then we can march both up at the // same time from here on out. while (a) { // If they are at the same level, and have the same parent region then we // succeeded. if (a->getParent() == b->getParent()) return true; a = getAncestorBlock(a); b = getAncestorBlock(b); } // They don't share an NCA, perhaps they are in different modules or // something. return false; } template Block * DominanceInfoBase::findNearestCommonDominator(Block *a, Block *b) const { // If either a or b are null, then conservatively return nullptr. if (!a || !b) return nullptr; // If they are the same block, then we are done. if (a == b) return a; // Try to find blocks that are in the same region. if (!tryGetBlocksInSameRegion(a, b)) return nullptr; // If the common ancestor in a common region is the same block, then return // it. if (a == b) return a; // Otherwise, there must be multiple blocks in the region, check the // DomTree. return getDomTree(a->getParent()).findNearestCommonDominator(a, b); } /// Return true if the specified block A properly dominates block B. template bool DominanceInfoBase::properlyDominates(Block *a, Block *b) const { assert(a && b && "null blocks not allowed"); // A block dominates itself but does not properly dominate itself. if (a == b) return false; // If both blocks are not in the same region, `a` properly dominates `b` if // `b` is defined in an operation region that (recursively) ends up being // dominated by `a`. Walk up the list of containers enclosing B. Region *regionA = a->getParent(); if (regionA != b->getParent()) { b = regionA ? regionA->findAncestorBlockInRegion(*b) : nullptr; // If we could not find a valid block b then it is a not a dominator. if (b == nullptr) return false; // Check to see if the ancestor of `b` is the same block as `a`. A properly // dominates B if it contains an op that contains the B block. if (a == b) return true; } // Otherwise, they are two different blocks in the same region, use DomTree. return getDomTree(regionA).properlyDominates(a, b); } /// Return true if the specified block is reachable from the entry block of /// its region. template bool DominanceInfoBase::isReachableFromEntry(Block *a) const { // If this is the first block in its region, then it is obviously reachable. Region *region = a->getParent(); if (®ion->front() == a) return true; // Otherwise this is some block in a multi-block region. Check DomTree. return getDomTree(region).isReachableFromEntry(a); } template class detail::DominanceInfoBase; template class detail::DominanceInfoBase; //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// // DominanceInfo //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// /// Return true if operation `a` properly dominates operation `b`. The /// 'enclosingOpOk' flag says whether we should return true if the `b` op is /// enclosed by a region on 'a'. bool DominanceInfo::properlyDominatesImpl(Operation *a, Operation *b, bool enclosingOpOk) const { Block *aBlock = a->getBlock(), *bBlock = b->getBlock(); assert(aBlock && bBlock && "operations must be in a block"); // An instruction dominates, but does not properlyDominate, itself unless this // is a graph region. if (a == b) return !hasSSADominance(aBlock); // If these ops are in different regions, then normalize one into the other. Region *aRegion = aBlock->getParent(); if (aRegion != bBlock->getParent()) { // Scoot up b's region tree until we find an operation in A's region that // encloses it. If this fails, then we know there is no post-dom relation. b = aRegion ? aRegion->findAncestorOpInRegion(*b) : nullptr; if (!b) return false; bBlock = b->getBlock(); assert(bBlock->getParent() == aRegion); // If 'a' encloses 'b', then we consider it to dominate. if (a == b && enclosingOpOk) return true; } // Ok, they are in the same region now. if (aBlock == bBlock) { // Dominance changes based on the region type. In a region with SSA // dominance, uses inside the same block must follow defs. In other // regions kinds, uses and defs can come in any order inside a block. if (hasSSADominance(aBlock)) { // If the blocks are the same, then check if b is before a in the block. return a->isBeforeInBlock(b); } return true; } // If the blocks are different, use DomTree to resolve the query. return getDomTree(aRegion).properlyDominates(aBlock, bBlock); } /// Return true if the `a` value properly dominates operation `b`, i.e if the /// operation that defines `a` properlyDominates `b` and the operation that /// defines `a` does not contain `b`. bool DominanceInfo::properlyDominates(Value a, Operation *b) const { // block arguments properly dominate all operations in their own block, so // we use a dominates check here, not a properlyDominates check. if (auto blockArg = a.dyn_cast()) return dominates(blockArg.getOwner(), b->getBlock()); // `a` properlyDominates `b` if the operation defining `a` properlyDominates // `b`, but `a` does not itself enclose `b` in one of its regions. return properlyDominatesImpl(a.getDefiningOp(), b, /*enclosingOpOk=*/false); } //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// // PostDominanceInfo //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// /// Returns true if statement 'a' properly postdominates statement b. bool PostDominanceInfo::properlyPostDominates(Operation *a, Operation *b) { auto *aBlock = a->getBlock(), *bBlock = b->getBlock(); assert(aBlock && bBlock && "operations must be in a block"); // An instruction postDominates, but does not properlyPostDominate, itself // unless this is a graph region. if (a == b) return !hasSSADominance(aBlock); // If these ops are in different regions, then normalize one into the other. Region *aRegion = aBlock->getParent(); if (aRegion != bBlock->getParent()) { // Scoot up b's region tree until we find an operation in A's region that // encloses it. If this fails, then we know there is no post-dom relation. b = aRegion ? aRegion->findAncestorOpInRegion(*b) : nullptr; if (!b) return false; bBlock = b->getBlock(); assert(bBlock->getParent() == aRegion); // If 'a' encloses 'b', then we consider it to postdominate. if (a == b) return true; } // Ok, they are in the same region. If they are in the same block, check if b // is before a in the block. if (aBlock == bBlock) { // Dominance changes based on the region type. if (hasSSADominance(aBlock)) { // If the blocks are the same, then check if b is before a in the block. return b->isBeforeInBlock(a); } return true; } // If the blocks are different, check if a's block post dominates b's. return getDomTree(aRegion).properlyDominates(aBlock, bBlock); }