1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
|
//
// SoapAttributeOverrides.cs:
//
// Author:
// John Donagher (john@webmeta.com)
//
// (C) 2002 John Donagher
//
using System;
using System.Collections;
namespace System.Xml.Serialization
{
/// <summary>
///
/// </summary>
public class SoapAttributeOverrides
{
/// <summary>
/// This class requires to store SoapAttrributes indexed by a key containg
/// both Type and Member Name. There are 3 approaches to this IMO.
/// 1. Make the key as "FullTypeName..MemberName", with ".." seperating Type and Member.
/// 2. Use a jagged 2D hashtable. The main hashtable is indexed by Type and each value
/// contains another hashtable which is indexed by member names. (Too many hashtables)
/// 3. Use a new class which emcompasses the Type and MemberName. An implementation is there
/// in TypeMember class in this namespace. (Too many instantiations of the class needed)
///
/// Method 1 is the most elegent, but I am not sure if the seperator is language insensitive.
/// What if someone writes a language which allows . in the member names.
/// </summary>
///
private Hashtable overrides;
public SoapAttributeOverrides ()
{
overrides = new Hashtable();
}
public SoapAttributes this [Type type]
{
get { return this [type, string.Empty]; }
}
public SoapAttributes this [Type type, string member]
{
get
{
return (SoapAttributes) overrides[GetKey(type,member)];
}
}
public void Add (Type type, SoapAttributes attributes)
{
Add(type, string.Empty, attributes);
}
public void Add (Type type, string member, SoapAttributes attributes)
{
if(overrides[GetKey(type, member)] != null)
throw new Exception("The attributes for the given type and Member already exist in the collection");
overrides.Add(GetKey(type,member), attributes);
}
private TypeMember GetKey(Type type, string member)
{
return new TypeMember(type, member);
}
}
}
|
