| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
a branch-off
Signed-off-by: Joas Schilling <coding@schilljs.com>
|
|
This should make the problem clearer if Talk could not be enabled (for
example, due to a version mismatch), as otherwise the tests would fail
in more cryptic ways.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Joas Schilling <coding@schilljs.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: John Molakvoæ (skjnldsv) <skjnldsv@protonmail.com>
|
|
frame-ancestors doesn't fall back to default-src. So when we apply a
very restricted CSP we should make sure to set it to 'none' and not
leave it empty.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
|
|
Enabling the "send password by Talk" property of shares require that
Talk is installed and enabled, so the Drone step that runs them has to
first clone the Talk repository.
When the integration tests are run on a local development instance,
however, it is not guaranteed that Talk is installed. Due to this the
"@Talk" tag was added, which ensures that any feature or scenario marked
with it will first check if Talk is installed and, if not, skip the
scenario (instead of failing).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
|
|
In most cases, when a mail share is created or updated an e-mail is sent
to the sharee, which is done by connecting to the SMTP server set in the
configuration. If the server can not be contacted then the creation or
update of the mail share fails.
To make possible to test mail shares without using a real SMTP server a
fake one has been added. The original script, which is MIT licensed, was
based on inetd, so it was slightly modified to run on its own.
In order to use it from the integration tests the "Given dummy mail
server is listening" step has to be called in the scenarios in which the
mail server is needed.
For now that is the only available step; things like checking the sent
mails, while possible (as the script can log the mails to certain file),
have not been added yet.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
|
|
Note that the "last link share can be downloaded" step was kept as it
tests the "url" property specific of link shares.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
|
|
The step names were adjusted accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Julius Härtl <jus@bitgrid.net>
|
|
This adds no value at all. Just showing the text "(Shared link)" now.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Maxence Lange <maxence@artificial-owl.com>
add tests on non-owner pov
Signed-off-by: Maxence Lange <maxence@artificial-owl.com>
duplicate
Signed-off-by: Maxence Lange <maxence@artificial-owl.com>
small fixes
Signed-off-by: Maxence Lange <maxence@artificial-owl.com>
removed tags
Signed-off-by: Maxence Lange <maxence@artificial-owl.com>
|
|
Now all incoming shares need to be explicitly accepted before being able
to use the shared file or get information about a reshare (although
getting the information of the incoming share is possible before
accepting it).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
|
|
This makes possible to use steps that reference the last share, which
will be needed to accept pending shares.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
|
|
A user with reshare permissions on a file is now able to get any share
of that file (just like the owner).
Signed-off-by: John Molakvoæ (skjnldsv) <skjnldsv@protonmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
|
|
This will be needed to test scenarios in which updating a share return a
different HTTP status code, like 401.
The assertion for the 200 HTTP status code was added in those scenarios
that tested updating a share (that is, those that were also checking the
OCS status code), but not in those in which updating a share was just a
preparatory step for the actual test (in the same way that the HTTP
status code is not checked in those tests when creating a share).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: John Molakvoæ (skjnldsv) <skjnldsv@protonmail.com>
|
