diff options
author | Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> | 2018-05-01 19:34:52 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> | 2018-05-04 01:57:39 +0300 |
commit | bd201102862a194f3f5ce669e0a3c8143eafc900 (patch) | |
tree | 22c86fcd4bff3716704c981f14fa80c3a6dd0d6b /src/async_wrap.cc | |
parent | a9b0d8235d5ae11a5ae0748f05c4d290a848f1b9 (diff) |
src: refactor `BaseObject` internal field management
- Instead of storing a pointer whose type refers to the specific
subclass of `BaseObject`, just store a `BaseObject*` directly.
This means in particular that one can cast to classes along
the way of the inheritance chain without issues, and that
`BaseObject*` no longer needs to be the first superclass
in the case of multiple inheritance.
In particular, this renders hack-y solutions to this problem (like
ddc19be6de1ba263d9c175b2760696e7b9918b25) obsolete and addresses
a `TODO` comment of mine.
- Move wrapping/unwrapping methods to the `BaseObject` class.
We use these almost exclusively for `BaseObject`s, and I hope
that this gives a better idea of how (and for what) these are used
in our code.
- Perform initialization/deinitialization of the internal field
in the `BaseObject*` constructor/destructor. This makes the code
a bit more obviously correct, avoids explicit calls for this
in subclass constructors, and in particular allows us to avoid
crash situations when we previously called `ClearWrap()`
during GC.
This also means that we enforce that the object passed to the
`BaseObject` constructor needs to have an internal field.
This is the only reason for the test change.
- Change the signature of `MakeWeak()` to not require a pointer
argument. Previously, this would always have been the same
as `this`, and no other value made sense. Also, the parameter
was something that I personally found somewhat confusing
when becoming familiar with Node’s code.
- Add a `TODO` comment that motivates switching to real inheritance
for the JS types we expose from the native side. This patch
brings us a lot closer to being able to do that.
- Some less significant drive-by cleanup.
Since we *effectively* already store the `BaseObject*` pointer
anyway since ddc19be6de1ba263d9c175b2760696e7b9918b25, I do not
think that this is going to have any impact on diagnostic tooling.
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/18897
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/20455
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/async_wrap.cc')
-rw-r--r-- | src/async_wrap.cc | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/src/async_wrap.cc b/src/async_wrap.cc index 06dcbb4fb1d..f7a6d4e68dd 100644 --- a/src/async_wrap.cc +++ b/src/async_wrap.cc @@ -123,8 +123,8 @@ RetainedObjectInfo* WrapperInfo(uint16_t class_id, Local<Value> wrapper) { Local<Object> object = wrapper.As<Object>(); CHECK_GT(object->InternalFieldCount(), 0); - AsyncWrap* wrap = Unwrap<AsyncWrap>(object); - if (wrap == nullptr) return nullptr; // ClearWrap() already called. + AsyncWrap* wrap; + ASSIGN_OR_RETURN_UNWRAP(&wrap, object, nullptr); return new RetainedAsyncInfo(class_id, wrap); } @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ class PromiseWrap : public AsyncWrap { public: PromiseWrap(Environment* env, Local<Object> object, bool silent) : AsyncWrap(env, object, PROVIDER_PROMISE, -1, silent) { - MakeWeak(this); + MakeWeak(); } size_t self_size() const override { return sizeof(*this); } |