diff options
author | Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> | 2018-05-01 19:34:52 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> | 2018-05-04 01:57:39 +0300 |
commit | bd201102862a194f3f5ce669e0a3c8143eafc900 (patch) | |
tree | 22c86fcd4bff3716704c981f14fa80c3a6dd0d6b /src/udp_wrap.cc | |
parent | a9b0d8235d5ae11a5ae0748f05c4d290a848f1b9 (diff) |
src: refactor `BaseObject` internal field management
- Instead of storing a pointer whose type refers to the specific
subclass of `BaseObject`, just store a `BaseObject*` directly.
This means in particular that one can cast to classes along
the way of the inheritance chain without issues, and that
`BaseObject*` no longer needs to be the first superclass
in the case of multiple inheritance.
In particular, this renders hack-y solutions to this problem (like
ddc19be6de1ba263d9c175b2760696e7b9918b25) obsolete and addresses
a `TODO` comment of mine.
- Move wrapping/unwrapping methods to the `BaseObject` class.
We use these almost exclusively for `BaseObject`s, and I hope
that this gives a better idea of how (and for what) these are used
in our code.
- Perform initialization/deinitialization of the internal field
in the `BaseObject*` constructor/destructor. This makes the code
a bit more obviously correct, avoids explicit calls for this
in subclass constructors, and in particular allows us to avoid
crash situations when we previously called `ClearWrap()`
during GC.
This also means that we enforce that the object passed to the
`BaseObject` constructor needs to have an internal field.
This is the only reason for the test change.
- Change the signature of `MakeWeak()` to not require a pointer
argument. Previously, this would always have been the same
as `this`, and no other value made sense. Also, the parameter
was something that I personally found somewhat confusing
when becoming familiar with Node’s code.
- Add a `TODO` comment that motivates switching to real inheritance
for the JS types we expose from the native side. This patch
brings us a lot closer to being able to do that.
- Some less significant drive-by cleanup.
Since we *effectively* already store the `BaseObject*` pointer
anyway since ddc19be6de1ba263d9c175b2760696e7b9918b25, I do not
think that this is going to have any impact on diagnostic tooling.
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/18897
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/20455
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/udp_wrap.cc')
-rw-r--r-- | src/udp_wrap.cc | 16 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/src/udp_wrap.cc b/src/udp_wrap.cc index e02220a8784..414fe07eab6 100644 --- a/src/udp_wrap.cc +++ b/src/udp_wrap.cc @@ -53,7 +53,6 @@ using AsyncHooks = Environment::AsyncHooks; class SendWrap : public ReqWrap<uv_udp_send_t> { public: SendWrap(Environment* env, Local<Object> req_wrap_obj, bool have_callback); - ~SendWrap(); inline bool have_callback() const; size_t msg_size; size_t self_size() const override { return sizeof(*this); } @@ -67,12 +66,6 @@ SendWrap::SendWrap(Environment* env, bool have_callback) : ReqWrap(env, req_wrap_obj, AsyncWrap::PROVIDER_UDPSENDWRAP), have_callback_(have_callback) { - Wrap(req_wrap_obj, this); -} - - -SendWrap::~SendWrap() { - ClearWrap(object()); } @@ -81,12 +74,6 @@ inline bool SendWrap::have_callback() const { } -static void NewSendWrap(const FunctionCallbackInfo<Value>& args) { - CHECK(args.IsConstructCall()); - ClearWrap(args.This()); -} - - UDPWrap::UDPWrap(Environment* env, Local<Object> object) : HandleWrap(env, object, @@ -153,8 +140,7 @@ void UDPWrap::Initialize(Local<Object> target, // Create FunctionTemplate for SendWrap Local<FunctionTemplate> swt = - FunctionTemplate::New(env->isolate(), NewSendWrap); - swt->InstanceTemplate()->SetInternalFieldCount(1); + BaseObject::MakeLazilyInitializedJSTemplate(env); AsyncWrap::AddWrapMethods(env, swt); Local<String> sendWrapString = FIXED_ONE_BYTE_STRING(env->isolate(), "SendWrap"); |