Questionmark

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/_posts/2020-20-17-ecosystem.md b/_posts/2020-20-17-ecosystem.md
index f742901..3c9c9df 100644
--- a/_posts/2020-20-17-ecosystem.md
+++ b/_posts/2020-20-17-ecosystem.md
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Our current operating systems enjoy equal freedom not by accident. None of our d
 Closed ecosystems have the market cornered on a turn for the worse. This will not change.
 Pick a way to rewind your lifeless freedom back up the corporate diving board. A leap of bad faith away, in imminent death to freedom. Understand that beyond the entrance, your decision amounts to choice of window, or emphasis on choice; for limitation thereof. The fun of the experience limited—to hitting the ground. Cost of entry isn't the distinction of monetary penalty, nor is it in the building's elegant ways of sending you to your place. Sometimes the people in it think they belong. At least they used to. It is a refined death-march symphony of the monopolkaliszt.
 
-To the tune of this succession, maybe it may be made possible to install our software onto one of these gardened-wall systems, even in any way of doing so within a software system you control. Is a regression toward the normie getting the better of a good component, or is the freedom on offer a symbiosis lost. In this line of inquiry, our software and that of others already offers an alternative to central operation without tying the subordinate to it. _Central_ is not always comparatively limiting, but that limitation is a drunk-driving force in centralization. What kills that centralization and limitation respectively most effectively and efficiently? If not its corruption or stagnation, then so be it. Civilization cascades and trancscnds errors and fixes. Governing truth lies within the system of selection.
+To the tune of this succession, maybe it may be made possible to install our software onto one of these gardened-wall systems, even in any way of doing so within a software system you control. Is a regression toward the normie getting the better of a good component, or is the freedom on offer a symbiosis lost? In this line of inquiry, our software and that of others already offers an alternative to central operation without tying the subordinate to it. _Central_ is not always comparatively limiting, but that limitation is a drunk-driving force in centralization. What kills that centralization and limitation respectively most effectively and efficiently? If not its corruption or stagnation, then so be it. Civilization cascades and trancscnds errors and fixes. Governing truth lies within the system of selection.
 
 To prod a logical extremity, following a frictionally slippery slope where-from connecting to a backwards system from something that isn't, does indeed let you run afoul of running it on your end. Only should further choice be taken away from you is making your compromised system less so a better choice than replacing it. While a disciplinary thermodynamic challenge, someone may scratch that itch, and even document it. It wouldn't offend in the slightest, with extended thanks to bigger and unfried fish.