Welcome to mirror list, hosted at ThFree Co, Russian Federation.

gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitaly.git - Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.
summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-01-21Lint: turn "errcheck" on by defaultÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
We can turn this on by default by being a bit more permissive about common cases in non-*_test.go files that should be OK not to check the return value of most of the time (e.g. os.Remove()), and then having a giant exclusions list for the rest.
2021-01-21Lint: turn "golint" on by defaultÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Since we've got quite a common warning about things needing comments, add a gigantic list of those exclusions. Generated with: make lint |grep golint | sort | perl -pe 's/^(.*?):\d+:\d\s*golint\s*(.*)/ - linters: \n - golint\n path: "$1"\n text: "$2"/g' Except I then had to escape "(" in the text to "\\(" because they're regexes. I suggested simply turning this specific warning off, but others in today's team meeting wanted to keep it. So here it is as a giant list.
2021-01-21Revert & amend "disable gochecknoglobals linter"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
This reverts & amends commit 0b5a8ea8e (disable gochecknoglobals linter, 2020-12-17). We can just exclude the feature variables from the complaining. This leaves a manageable amount of issues which we can add to "make lint-strict".
2021-01-21Lint: split up "make lint" and "make lint-strict" configsÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Take a different approach than 20ef26439 (golangci: Enable error and documentation linters, 2020-12-17) did and get rid of "new-from-rev" entirely. Instead we have config for "make lint-strict" which isn't passing yet, and the main config for "make lint" which'll cause a CI failure. After looking a bit into how "new-from-rev" works I think using it is just a fundamentally bad idea in our case. All we want is to phase-in new lints, which we can just do better like this with a new config. To figure out what lines to complain about since "b7d42677f" it has to run: git diff --relative b7d42677f Which currently takes ~200ms for me, but that relatively short time is because it's ~300 commits ago. If we take something ~3000 commits ago (early 2020, so not that long) like "1e3d3131f" it's going to take ~3 seconds, and worse we're starting to run into the default diff.renameLimit there, so the diff will suddenly get much worse. So the whole thing is a ticking timebomb in behavior & gradual slowdown waiting to happen.