Welcome to mirror list, hosted at ThFree Co, Russian Federation.

gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss.git - Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.
summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/app
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>2015-12-28 15:05:55 +0300
committerRobert Speicher <rspeicher@gmail.com>2015-12-29 09:34:03 +0300
commit795a29aee541089a14650e9aed1bdbf718e6e003 (patch)
tree3a159b4e7aa8f6b4c8d98cfbb68d7ab88df06f38 /app
parent92e0722f0f23f8683b8127cd86595d32427cb4e1 (diff)
Merge branch 'disable-git-follow' into 'master'
Disable --follow in `git log` to avoid loading duplicate commit data in infinite scroll `git` doesn't work properly when `--follow` and `--skip` are specified together. We could even be **omitting commits in the Web log** as a result. Here are the gory details. Let's say you ran: ``` git log -n=5 --skip=2 README ``` This is the working case since it omits `--follow`. This is what happens: 1. `git` starts at `HEAD` and traverses down the tree until it finds the top-most commit relevant to README. 2. Once this is found, this commit is returned via `get_revision_1()`. 3. If the `skip_count` is positive, decrement and repeat step 2. Otherwise go onto step 4. 4. `show_log()` gets called with that commit. 5. Repeat step 1 until we have all five entries. That's exactly what we want. What happens when you use `--follow`? You have to understand how step 1 is performed: * When you specify a pathspec on the command-line (e.g. README), a flag `prune` [gets set here](https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/revision.c#L2351). * If the `prune` flag is active, `get_commit_action()` determines whether the commit should be [scanned for matching paths](https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/revision.c#L2989). * In the case of `--follow`, however, `prune` is [disabled here](https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/revision.c#L2350). * As a result, a commit is never scanned for matching paths and therefore never pruned. `HEAD` will always get returned as the first commit, even if it's not relevant to the README. * Making matters worse, the `--skip` in the example above would actually skip a every other entry after `HEAD` N times. If README were changed in these skipped commits, we would actually miss information! Since git uses a matching algorithm to determine whether a file was renamed, I believe `git` needs to generate a diff of each commit to do this and traverse each commit one-by-one to do this. I think that's the rationale for disabling the `prune` functionality since you can't just do a simple string comparison. Closes #4181, #4229, #3574, #2410 See merge request !2210
Diffstat (limited to 'app')
-rw-r--r--app/models/repository.rb4
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/app/models/repository.rb b/app/models/repository.rb
index 2c25f4ce451..1f4651f14ed 100644
--- a/app/models/repository.rb
+++ b/app/models/repository.rb
@@ -76,7 +76,9 @@ class Repository
path: path,
limit: limit,
offset: offset,
- follow: path.present?
+ # --follow doesn't play well with --skip. See:
+ # https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/3574#note_3040520
+ follow: false
}
commits = Gitlab::Git::Commit.where(options)