diff options
author | GitLab Bot <gitlab-bot@gitlab.com> | 2023-05-17 19:05:49 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | GitLab Bot <gitlab-bot@gitlab.com> | 2023-05-17 19:05:49 +0300 |
commit | 43a25d93ebdabea52f99b05e15b06250cd8f07d7 (patch) | |
tree | dceebdc68925362117480a5d672bcff122fb625b /doc/architecture/blueprints/cells/index.md | |
parent | 20c84b99005abd1c82101dfeff264ac50d2df211 (diff) |
Add latest changes from gitlab-org/gitlab@16-0-stable-eev16.0.0-rc42
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/architecture/blueprints/cells/index.md')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/architecture/blueprints/cells/index.md | 360 |
1 files changed, 360 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/architecture/blueprints/cells/index.md b/doc/architecture/blueprints/cells/index.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9938875adb6 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/architecture/blueprints/cells/index.md @@ -0,0 +1,360 @@ +--- +status: accepted +creation-date: "2022-09-07" +authors: [ "@ayufan", "@fzimmer", "@DylanGriffith" ] +coach: "@ayufan" +approvers: [ "@fzimmer" ] +owning-stage: "~devops::enablement" +participating-stages: [] +--- + +<!-- vale gitlab.FutureTense = NO --> + +# Cells + +This document is a work-in-progress and represents a very early state of the Cells design. Significant aspects are not documented, though we expect to add them in the future. + +Cells is a new architecture for our Software as a Service platform. This architecture is horizontally-scalable, resilient, and provides a more consistent user experience. It may also provide additional features in the future, such as data residency control (regions) and federated features. + +For more information about Cells, see also: + +- [Glossary](glossary.md) +- [Goals](goals.md) +- [Cross-section impact](impact.md) + +## Work streams + +We can't ship the entire Cells architecture in one go - it is too large. +Instead, we are defining key work streams required by the project. + +Not all objectives need to be fulfilled to reach production readiness. +It is expected that some objectives will not be completed for General Availability (GA), +but will be enough to run Cells in production. + +### 1. Data access layer + +Before Cells can be run in production we need to prepare the codebase to accept the Cells architecture. +This preparation involves: + +- Allowing data sharing between Cells. +- Updating the tooling for discovering cross-Cell data traversal. +- Defining code practices for cross-Cell data traversal. +- Analyzing the data model to define the data affinity. + +Under this objective the following steps are expected: + +1. **Allow to share cluster-wide data with database-level data access layer.** + + Cells can connect to a database containing shared data. For example: + application settings, users, or routing information. + +1. **Evaluate the efficiency of database-level access vs. API-oriented access layer.** + + Reconsider the consequences of database-level data access for data migration, resiliency of updates and of interconnected systems when we share only a subset of data. + +1. **Cluster-unique identifiers** + + Every object has a unique identifier that can be used to access data across the cluster. The IDs for allocated projects, issues and any other objects are cluster-unique. + +1. **Cluster-wide deletions** + + If entities deleted in Cell 2 are cross-referenced, they are properly deleted or nullified across clusters. We will likely re-use existing [loose foreign keys](../../../development/database/loose_foreign_keys.md) to extend it with cross-Cells data removal. + +1. **Data access layer** + + Ensure that a stable data-access (versioned) layer that allows to share cluster-wide data is implemented. + +1. **Database migration** + + Ensure that migrations can be run independently between Cells, and we safely handle migrations of shared data in a way that does not impact other Cells. + +### 2. Essential workflows + +To make Cells viable we require to define and support +essential workflows before we can consider the Cells +to be of Beta quality. Essential workflows are meant +to cover the majority of application functionality +that makes the product mostly useable, but with some caveats. + +The current approach is to define workflows from top to bottom. +The order defines the presumed priority of the items. +This list is not exhaustive as we would be expecting +other teams to help and fix their workflows after +the initial phase, in which we fix the fundamental ones. + +To consider a project ready for the Beta phase, it is expected +that all features defined below are supported by Cells. +In the cases listed below, the workflows define a set of tables +to be properly attributed to the feature. In some cases, +a table with an ambiguous usage has to be broken down. +For example: `uploads` are used to store user avatars, +as well as uploaded attachments for comments. It would be expected +that `uploads` is split into `uploads` (describing group/project-level attachments) +and `global_uploads` (describing, for example, user avatars). + +Except for initial 2-3 quarters this work is highly parallel. +It would be expected that **group::tenant scale** would help other +teams to fix their feature set to work with Cells. The first 2-3 quarters +would be required to define a general split of data and build required tooling. + +1. **Instance-wide settings are shared across cluster.** + + The Admin Area section for most part is shared across a cluster. + +1. **User accounts are shared across cluster.** + + The purpose is to make `users` cluster-wide. + +1. **User can create group.** + + The purpose is to perform a targeted decomposition of `users` and `namespaces`, because the `namespaces` will be stored locally in the Cell. + +1. **User can create project.** + + The purpose is to perform a targeted decomposition of `users` and `projects`, because the `projects` will be stored locally in the Cell. + +1. **User can change profile avatar that is shared in cluster.** + + The purpose is to fix global uploads that are shared in cluster. + +1. **User can push to Git repository.** + + The purpose is to ensure that essential joins from the projects table are properly attributed to be + Cell-local, and as a result the essential Git workflow is supported. + +1. **User can run CI pipeline.** + + The purpose is that `ci_pipelines` (like `ci_stages`, `ci_builds`, `ci_job_artifacts`) and adjacent tables are properly attributed to be Cell-local. + +1. **User can create issue, merge request, and merge it after it is green.** + + The purpose is to ensure that `issues` and `merge requests` are properly attributed to be `Cell-local`. + +1. **User can manage group and project members.** + + The `members` table is properly attributed to be either `Cell-local` or `cluster-wide`. + +1. **User can manage instance-wide runners.** + + The purpose is to scope all CI Runners to be Cell-local. Instance-wide runners in fact become Cell-local runners. The expectation is to provide a user interface view and manage all runners per Cell, instead of per cluster. + +1. **User is part of organization and can only see information from the organization.** + + The purpose is to have many organizations per Cell, but never have a single organization spanning across many Cells. This is required to ensure that information shown within an organization is isolated, and does not require fetching information from other Cells. + +### 3. Additional workflows + +Some of these additional workflows might need to be supported, depending on the group decision. +This list is not exhaustive of work needed to be done. + +1. **User can use all group-level features.** +1. **User can use all project-level features.** +1. **User can share groups with other groups in an organization.** +1. **User can create system webhook.** +1. **User can upload and manage packages.** +1. **User can manage security detection features.** +1. **User can manage Kubernetes integration.** +1. TBD + +### 4. Routing layer + +The routing layer is meant to offer a consistent user experience where all Cells are presented +under a single domain (for example, `gitlab.com`), instead of +having to navigate to separate domains. + +The user will able to use `https://gitlab.com` to access Cell-enabled GitLab. Depending +on the URL access, it will be transparently proxied to the correct Cell that can serve this particular +information. For example: + +- All requests going to `https://gitlab.com/users/sign_in` are randomly distributed to all Cells. +- All requests going to `https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/tree/master` are always directed to Cell 5, for example. +- All requests going to `https://gitlab.com/my-username/my-project` are always directed to Cell 1. + +1. **Technology.** + + We decide what technology the routing service is written in. + The choice is dependent on the best performing language, and the expected way + and place of deployment of the routing layer. If it is required to make + the service multi-cloud it might be required to deploy it to the CDN provider. + Then the service needs to be written using a technology compatible with the CDN provider. + +1. **Cell discovery.** + + The routing service needs to be able to discover and monitor the health of all Cells. + +1. **Router endpoints classification.** + + The stateless routing service will fetch and cache information about endpoints + from one of the Cells. We need to implement a protocol that will allow us to + accurately describe the incoming request (its fingerprint), so it can be classified + by one of the Cells, and the results of that can be cached. We also need to implement + a mechanism for negative cache and cache eviction. + +1. **GraphQL and other ambigious endpoints.** + + Most endpoints have a unique sharding key: the organization, which directly + or indirectly (via a group or project) can be used to classify endpoints. + Some endpoints are ambiguous in their usage (they don't encode the sharding key), + or the sharding key is stored deep in the payload. In these cases, we need to decide how to handle endpoints like `/api/graphql`. + +### 5. Cell deployment + +We will run many Cells. To manage them easier, we need to have consistent +deployment procedures for Cells, including a way to deploy, manage, migrate, +and monitor. + +We are very likely to use tooling made for [GitLab Dedicated](https://about.gitlab.com/dedicated/) +with its control planes. + +1. **Extend GitLab Dedicated to support GCP.** +1. TBD + +### 6. Migration + +When we reach production and are able to store new organizations on new Cells, we need +to be able to divide big Cells into many smaller ones. + +1. **Use GitLab Geo to clone Cells.** + + The purpose is to use GitLab Geo to clone Cells. + +1. **Split Cells by cloning them.** + + Once Cell is cloned we change routing information for organizations. + Organization will encode `cell_id`. When we update `cell_id` it will automatically + make the given Cell to be authoritative to handle the traffic for the given organization. + +1. **Delete redundant data from previous Cells.** + + Since the organization is now stored on many Cells, once we change `cell_id` + we will have to remove data from all other Cells based on `organization_id`. + +## Availability of the feature + +We are following the [Support for Experiment, Beta, and Generally Available features](../../../policy/alpha-beta-support.md). + +### 1. Experiment + +Expectations: + +- We can deploy a Cell on staging or another testing environment by using a separate domain (ex. `cell2.staging.gitlab.com`) + using [Cell deployment](#5-cell-deployment) tooling. +- User can create organization, group and project, and run some of the [essential workflows](#2-essential-workflows). +- It is not expected to be able to run a router to serve all requests under a single domain. +- We expect data-loss of data stored on additional Cells. +- We expect to tear down and create many new Cells to validate tooling. + +### 2. Beta + +Expectations: + +- We can run many Cells under a single domain (ex. `staging.gitlab.com`). +- All features defined in [essential workflows](#2-essential-workflows) are supported. +- Not all aspects of [Routing layer](#4-routing-layer) are finalized. +- We expect additional Cells to be stable with minimal data loss. + +### 3. GA + +Expectations: + +- We can run many Cells under a single domain (for example, `staging.gitlab.com`). +- All features defined in [essential workflows](#2-essential-workflows) are supported. +- All features of [routing layer](#4-routing-layer) are supported. +- Most of [additional workflows](#3-additional-workflows) are supported. +- We don't expect to support any of [migration](#6-migration) aspects. + +### 4. Post GA + +Expectations: + +- We support all [additional workflows](#3-additional-workflows). +- We can [migrate](#6-migration) existing organizations onto new Cells. + +## Iteration plan + +The delivered iterations will focus on solving particular steps of a given +key work stream. + +It is expected that initial iterations will rather +be slow, because they require substantially more +changes to prepare the codebase for data split. + +One iteration describes one quarter's worth of work. + +1. Iteration 1 - FY24Q1 + + - Data access layer: Initial Admin Area settings are shared across cluster. + - Essential workflows: Allow to share cluster-wide data with database-level data access layer + +1. Iteration 2 - FY24Q2 + + - Essential workflows: User accounts are shared across cluster. + - Essential workflows: User can create group. + +1. Iteration 3 - FY24Q3 + + - Essential workflows: User can create project. + - Essential workflows: User can push to Git repository. + - Cell deployment: Extend GitLab Dedicated to support GCP + - Routing: Technology. + +1. Iteration 4 - FY24Q4 + + - Essential workflows: User can run CI pipeline. + - Essential workflows: User can create issue, merge request, and merge it after it is green. + - Data access layer: Evaluate the efficiency of database-level access vs. API-oriented access layer + - Data access layer: Cluster-unique identifiers. + - Routing: Cell discovery. + - Routing: Router endpoints classification. + +1. Iteration 5 - FY25Q1 + + - TBD + +## Technical Proposals + +The Cells architecture do have long lasting implications to data processing, location, scalability and the GitLab architecture. +This section links all different technical proposals that are being evaluated. + +- [Stateless Router That Uses a Cache to Pick Cell and Is Redirected When Wrong Cell Is Reached](proposal-stateless-router-with-buffering-requests.md) + +- [Stateless Router That Uses a Cache to Pick Cell and pre-flight `/api/v4/cells/learn`](proposal-stateless-router-with-routes-learning.md) + +## Impacted features + +The Cells architecture will impact many features requiring some of them to be rewritten, or changed significantly. +This is the list of known affected features with the proposed solutions. + +- [Cells: Git Access](cells-feature-git-access.md) +- [Cells: Data Migration](cells-feature-data-migration.md) +- [Cells: Database Sequences](cells-feature-database-sequences.md) +- [Cells: GraphQL](cells-feature-graphql.md) +- [Cells: Organizations](cells-feature-organizations.md) +- [Cells: Router Endpoints Classification](cells-feature-router-endpoints-classification.md) +- [Cells: Schema changes (Postgres and Elasticsearch migrations)](cells-feature-schema-changes.md) +- [Cells: Backups](cells-feature-backups.md) +- [Cells: Global Search](cells-feature-global-search.md) +- [Cells: CI Runners](cells-feature-ci-runners.md) +- [Cells: Admin Area](cells-feature-admin-area.md) +- [Cells: Secrets](cells-feature-secrets.md) +- [Cells: Container Registry](cells-feature-container-registry.md) +- [Cells: Contributions: Forks](cells-feature-contributions-forks.md) +- [Cells: Personal Namespaces](cells-feature-personal-namespaces.md) +- [Cells: Dashboard: Projects, Todos, Issues, Merge Requests, Activity, ...](cells-feature-dashboard.md) +- [Cells: Snippets](cells-feature-snippets.md) +- [Cells: Uploads](cells-feature-uploads.md) +- [Cells: GitLab Pages](cells-feature-gitlab-pages.md) +- [Cells: Agent for Kubernetes](cells-feature-agent-for-kubernetes.md) + +## Decision log + +- 2022-03-15: Google Cloud as the cloud service. For details, see [issue 396641](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/396641#note_1314932272). + +## Links + +- [Internal Pods presentation](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1x1uIiN8FR9fhL7pzFh9juHOVcSxEY7d2_q4uiKKGD44/edit#slide=id.ge7acbdc97a_0_155) +- [Internal link to all diagrams](https://drive.google.com/file/d/13NHzbTrmhUM-z_Bf0RjatUEGw5jWHSLt/view?usp=sharing) +- [Cells Epic](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/7582) +- [Database Group investigation](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/development/enablement/data_stores/database/doc/root-namespace-sharding.html) +- [Shopify Pods architecture](https://shopify.engineering/a-pods-architecture-to-allow-shopify-to-scale) +- [Opstrace architecture](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/opstrace/opstrace/-/blob/main/docs/architecture/overview.md) |