diff options
| author | Jacob Schatz <jschatz1@gmail.com> | 2016-07-22 17:53:45 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Stan Hu <stanhu@gmail.com> | 2016-07-23 06:13:46 +0300 |
| commit | d6ebd4a3f7af1b78259edc4a3ffdc4778f5d0725 (patch) | |
| tree | f45ed4438ca53b13719e81189a694bda94b589bb /doc/development/gotchas.md | |
| parent | 46a17ffd5a200b4d2aca914ef5bafe46db1cb9bf (diff) | |
Update docs for CoffeeScript -> JavaScript.
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/development/gotchas.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/development/gotchas.md | 5 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/doc/development/gotchas.md b/doc/development/gotchas.md index 9d7fe7440d2..fc52027ab94 100644 --- a/doc/development/gotchas.md +++ b/doc/development/gotchas.md @@ -41,10 +41,10 @@ Rubocop](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/8-4-stable/.rubocop.yml#L9 [Exception]: http://stackoverflow.com/q/10048173/223897 -## Don't use inline CoffeeScript in views +## Don't use inline CoffeeScript/Javascript in views Using the inline `:coffee` or `:coffeescript` Haml filters comes with a -performance overhead. +performance overhead. Using inline Javascript is not a good way to structure your code and should be avoided. _**Note:** We've [removed these two filters](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/config/initializers/hamlit.rb) in an initializer._ @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ in an initializer._ ### Further reading - Pull Request: [Replace CoffeeScript block into JavaScript in Views](https://git.io/vztMu) +- Stack Overflow: [Why you should not write inline JavaScript](http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/86589/why-should-i-avoid-inline-scripting) - Stack Overflow: [Performance implications of using :coffescript filter inside HAML templates?](http://stackoverflow.com/a/17571242/223897) ## ID-based CSS selectors need to be a bit more specific |