Update best_practices.md let section to also reference let! variables.

1 files changed, 8 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/doc/development/testing_guide/best_practices.md b/doc/development/testing_guide/best_practices.md
index acbfa1850b4..e124a768c2e 100644
--- a/doc/development/testing_guide/best_practices.md
+++ b/doc/development/testing_guide/best_practices.md
@@ -158,12 +158,13 @@ instead of 30+ seconds in case of a regular `spec_helper`.
 
 ### `let` variables
 
-GitLab's RSpec suite has made extensive use of `let` variables to reduce
-duplication. However, this sometimes [comes at the cost of clarity][lets-not],
+GitLab's RSpec suite has made extensive use of `let`(along with it strict, non-lazy
+version `let!`) variables to reduce duplication. However, this sometimes [comes at the cost of clarity][lets-not], 
 so we need to set some guidelines for their use going forward:
 
-- `let` variables are preferable to instance variables. Local variables are
-  preferable to `let` variables.
+- `let!` variables are preferable to instance variables. `let` variables
+  are preferable to `let!` variables. Local variables are preferable to 
+  `let` variables.
 - Use `let` to reduce duplication throughout an entire spec file.
 - Don't use `let` to define variables used by a single test; define them as
   local variables inside the test's `it` block.
@@ -173,6 +174,9 @@ so we need to set some guidelines for their use going forward:
 - Try to avoid overriding the definition of one `let` variable with another.
 - Don't define a `let` variable that's only used by the definition of another.
   Use a helper method instead.
+- `let!` variables should be used only in case if strict evaluation with defined 
+  order is required, otherwise `let` will suffice. Remember that `let` is lazy and won't 
+  be evaluated until it is referenced.
 
 [lets-not]: https://robots.thoughtbot.com/lets-not