Welcome to mirror list, hosted at ThFree Co, Russian Federation.

gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss.git - Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.
summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorYorick Peterse <yorickpeterse@gmail.com>2018-12-03 15:56:04 +0300
committerYorick Peterse <yorickpeterse@gmail.com>2018-12-04 16:40:08 +0300
commit191d5ab440bb37f17df342243665b12c4fbe6926 (patch)
treed18f3bde43d5f1de10c40acf12a199fd6c3a8763 /doc
parentee6fb2b1eec9645f82eaa0796ca283a4a146278a (diff)
Updated documentation of CE to EE merges
This updates the documentation of automatic CE to EE merges to cover the new automatic merging setup.
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
-rw-r--r--doc/development/automatic_ce_ee_merge.md283
1 files changed, 106 insertions, 177 deletions
diff --git a/doc/development/automatic_ce_ee_merge.md b/doc/development/automatic_ce_ee_merge.md
index 58e08d432cc..e4eb26b3aca 100644
--- a/doc/development/automatic_ce_ee_merge.md
+++ b/doc/development/automatic_ce_ee_merge.md
@@ -1,57 +1,33 @@
# Automatic CE->EE merge
-GitLab Community Edition is merged automatically every 3 hours into the
-Enterprise Edition (look for the [`CE Upstream` merge requests]).
-
-This merge is done automatically in a
-[scheduled pipeline](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/release-tools/-/jobs/43201679).
-
-## What to do if you are pinged in a `CE Upstream` merge request to resolve a conflict?
-
-1. Please resolve the conflict as soon as possible or ask someone else to do it
- - It's ok to resolve more conflicts than the one that you are asked to resolve.
- In that case, it's a good habit to ask for a double-check on your resolution
- by someone who is familiar with the code you touched.
-1. Once you have resolved your conflicts, push to the branch (no force-push)
-1. Assign the merge request to the next person that has to resolve a conflict
-1. If all conflicts are resolved after your resolution is pushed, keep the merge
- request assigned to you: **you are now responsible for the merge request to be
- green**
-1. If you are the last person to resolve the conflicts, the pipeline is green,
- and you have merge rights, merge the MR, but **do not** choose to squash.
- Otherwise, assign the MR to someone that can merge.
-1. If you need any help, you can ping the current [release managers], or ask in
- the `#ce-to-ee` Slack channel
-
-A few notes about the automatic CE->EE merge job:
-
-- If a merge is already in progress, the job
- [doesn't create a new one](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/release-tools/-/jobs/43157687).
-- If there is nothing to merge (i.e. EE is up-to-date with CE), the job doesn't
- create a new one
-- The job posts messages to the `#ce-to-ee` Slack channel to inform what's the
- current CE->EE merge status (e.g. "A new MR has been created", "A MR is still pending")
-
-[`CE Upstream` merge requests]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/merge_requests?label_name%5B%5D=CE+upstream
-[release managers]: https://about.gitlab.com/release-managers/
+Whenever a commit is pushed to the CE `master` branch, it is automatically
+merged into the EE `master` branch. If the commit produces any conflicts, it is
+instead reverted from CE `master`. When this happens, a merge request will be
+set up automatically that can be used to reinstate the changes. This merge
+request will be assigned to the author of the conflicting commit, or the merge
+request author if the commit author could not be associated with a GitLab user.
+If no author could be found, the merge request is assigned to a random member of
+the Delivery team. It is then up to this team member to figure out who to assign
+the merge request to.
+
+Because some commits can not be reverted if new commits depend on them, we also
+run a job periodically that processes a range of commits and tries to merge or
+revert them. This should ensure that all commits are either merged into EE
+`master`, or reverted, instead of just being left behind in CE.
## Always merge EE merge requests before their CE counterparts
**In order to avoid conflicts in the CE->EE merge, you should always merge the
EE version of your CE merge request first, if present.**
-The rationale for this is that as CE->EE merges are done automatically every few
-hours, it can happen that:
+The rationale for this is that as CE->EE merges are done automatically, it can
+happen that:
-1. A CE merge request that needs EE-specific changes is merged
-1. The automatic CE->EE merge happens
+1. A CE merge request that needs EE-specific changes is merged.
+1. The automatic CE->EE merge happens.
1. Conflicts due to the CE merge request occur since its EE merge request isn't
- merged yet
-1. The automatic merge bot will ping someone to resolve the conflict **that are
- already resolved in the EE merge request that isn't merged yet**
-
-That's a waste of time, and that's why you should merge EE merge request before
-their CE counterpart.
+ merged yet.
+1. The CE changes are reverted.
## Avoiding CE->EE merge conflicts beforehand
@@ -69,136 +45,89 @@ detect if the current branch's changes will conflict during the CE->EE merge.
The job reports what files are conflicting and how to set up a merge request
against EE.
-#### How the job works
-
-1. Generates the diff between your branch and current CE `master`
-1. Tries to apply it to current EE `master`
-1. If it applies cleanly, the job succeeds, otherwise...
-1. Detects a branch with the `ee-` prefix or `-ee` suffix in EE
-1. If it exists, generate the diff between this branch and current EE `master`
-1. Tries to apply it to current EE `master`
-1. If it applies cleanly, the job succeeds
-
-In the case where the job fails, it means you should create an `ee-<ce_branch>`
-or `<ce_branch>-ee` branch, push it to EE and open a merge request against EE
-`master`.
-At this point if you retry the failing job in your CE merge request, it should
-now pass.
-
-Notes:
-
-- This task is not a silver-bullet, its current goal is to bring awareness to
- developers that their work needs to be ported to EE.
-- Community contributors shouldn't be required to submit merge requests against
- EE, but reviewers should take actions by either creating such EE merge request
- or asking a GitLab developer to do it **before the merge request is merged**.
-- If you branch is too far behind `master`, the job will fail. In that case you
- should rebase your branch upon latest `master`.
-- Code reviews for merge requests often consist of multiple iterations of
- feedback and fixes. There is no need to update your EE MR after each
- iteration. Instead, create an EE MR as soon as you see the
- `ee_compat_check` job failing. After you receive the final approval
- from a Maintainer (but **before the CE MR is merged**) update the EE MR.
- This helps to identify significant conflicts sooner, but also reduces the
- number of times you have to resolve conflicts.
-- Please remember to
- [always have your EE merge request merged before the CE version](#always-merge-ee-merge-requests-before-their-ce-counterparts).
-- You can use [`git rerere`](https://git-scm.com/docs/git-rerere)
- to avoid resolving the same conflicts multiple times.
-
-### Cherry-picking from CE to EE
-
-For avoiding merge conflicts, we use a method of creating equivalent branches
-for CE and EE. If the `ee-compat-check` job fails, this process is required.
-
-This method only requires that you have cloned both CE and EE into your computer.
-If you don't have them yet, please go ahead and clone them:
-
-- Clone CE repo: `git clone git@gitlab.com:gitlab-org/gitlab-ce.git`
-- Clone EE repo: `git clone git@gitlab.com:gitlab-org/gitlab-ee.git`
-
-And the only additional setup we need is to add CE as remote of EE and vice-versa:
-
-- Open two terminal windows, one in CE, and another one in EE:
- - In EE: `git remote add ce git@gitlab.com:gitlab-org/gitlab-ce.git`
- - In CE: `git remote add ee git@gitlab.com:gitlab-org/gitlab-ee.git`
-
-That's all setup we need, so that we can cherry-pick a commit from CE to EE, and
-from EE to CE.
-
-Now, every time you create an MR for CE and EE:
-
-1. Open two terminal windows, one in CE, and another one in EE
-1. In the CE terminal:
- 1. Create the CE branch, e.g., `branch-example`
- 1. Make your changes and push a commit (commit A)
- 1. Create the CE merge request in GitLab
-1. In the EE terminal:
- 1. Create the EE-equivalent branch ending with `-ee`, e.g.,
- `git checkout -b branch-example-ee`
- 1. Fetch the CE branch: `git fetch ce branch-example`
- 1. Cherry-pick the commit A: `git cherry-pick commit-A-SHA`
- 1. If Git prompts you to fix the conflicts, do a `git status`
- to check which files contain conflicts, fix them, save the files
- 1. Add the changes with `git add .` but **DO NOT commit** them
- 1. Continue cherry-picking: `git cherry-pick --continue`
- 1. Push to EE: `git push origin branch-example-ee`
-1. Create the EE-equivalent MR and link to the CE MR from the
-description "Ports [CE-MR-LINK] to EE"
-1. Once all the jobs are passing in both CE and EE, you've addressed the
-feedback from your own team, and got them approved, the merge requests can be merged.
-1. When both MRs are ready, the EE merge request will be merged first, and the
-CE-equivalent will be merged next.
-
-**Important notes:**
-
-- The commit SHA can be easily found from the GitLab UI. From a merge request,
-open the tab **Commits** and click the copy icon to copy the commit SHA.
-- To cherry-pick a **commit range**, such as [A > B > C > D] use:
-
- ```shell
- git cherry-pick "oldest-commit-SHA^..newest-commit-SHA"
- ```
-
- For example, suppose the commit A is the oldest, and its SHA is `4f5e4018c09ed797fdf446b3752f82e46f5af502`,
- and the commit D is the newest, and its SHA is `80e1c9e56783bd57bd7129828ec20b252ebc0538`.
- The cherry-pick command will be:
-
- ```shell
- git cherry-pick "4f5e4018c09ed797fdf446b3752f82e46f5af502^..80e1c9e56783bd57bd7129828ec20b252ebc0538"
- ```
-
-- To cherry-pick a **merge commit**, use the flag `-m 1`. For example, suppose that the
-merge commit SHA is `138f5e2f20289bb376caffa0303adb0cac859ce1`:
-
- ```shell
- git cherry-pick -m 1 138f5e2f20289bb376caffa0303adb0cac859ce1
- ```
-- To cherry-pick multiple commits, such as B and D in a range [A > B > C > D], use:
-
- ```shell
- git cherry-pick commmit-B-SHA commit-D-SHA
- ```
-
- For example, suppose commit B SHA = `4f5e4018c09ed797fdf446b3752f82e46f5af502`,
- and the commit D SHA = `80e1c9e56783bd57bd7129828ec20b252ebc0538`.
- The cherry-pick command will be:
-
- ```shell
- git cherry-pick 4f5e4018c09ed797fdf446b3752f82e46f5af502 80e1c9e56783bd57bd7129828ec20b252ebc0538
- ```
-
- This case is particularly useful when you have a merge commit in a sequence of
- commits and you want to cherry-pick all but the merge commit.
-
-- If you push more commits to the CE branch, you can safely repeat the procedure
-to cherry-pick them to the EE-equivalent branch. You can do that as many times as
-necessary, using the same CE and EE branches.
-- If you submitted the merge request to the CE repo and the `ee-compat-check` job passed,
-you are not required to submit the EE-equivalent MR, but it's still recommended. If the
-job failed, you are required to submit the EE MR so that you can fix the conflicts in EE
-before merging your changes into CE.
-
----
-
-[Return to Development documentation](README.md)
+## How to reinstate changes
+
+When a commit is reverted, the corresponding merge request to reinstate the
+changes will include all the details necessary to ensure the changes make it
+back into CE and EE. However, you still need to manually set up an EE merge
+request that resolves the conflicts.
+
+Each merge request used to reinstate changes will have the "reverted" label
+applied. Please do not remove this label, as it will be used to determine how
+many times commits are reverted and how long it takes to reinstate the changes.
+
+An example merge request can be found in [CE merge request
+23280](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/23280).
+
+## How it works
+
+The automatic merging is performed using a project called [Merge
+Train](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/merge-train/). For every commit to merge or
+revert, we generate patches using `git format-patch` which we then try to apply
+using `git am --3way`. If this succeeds we push the changes to EE, if this fails
+we decide what to do based on the failure reason:
+
+1. If the patch could not be applied because it was already applied, we just
+ skip it.
+1. If the patch caused conflicts, we revert the source commits.
+
+Commits are reverted in reverse order, ensuring that if commit B depends on A,
+and both conflict, we first revert B followed by reverting A.
+
+## FAQ
+
+### Why?
+
+We want to work towards being able to deploy continuously, but this requires
+that `master` is always stable and has all the changes we need. If CE `master`
+can not be merged into EE `master` due to merge conflicts, this prevents _any_
+change from CE making its way into EE. Since GitLab.com runs on EE, this
+effectively prevents us from deploying changes.
+
+Past experiences and data have shown that periodic CE to EE merge requests do
+not scale, and often take a very long time to complete. For example, [in this
+comment](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/release/framework/issues/49#note_114614619)
+we determined that the average time to close an upstream merge request is around
+5 hours, with peaks up to several days. Periodic merge requests are also
+frustrating to work with, because they often include many changes unrelated to
+your own changes.
+
+Automatically merging or reverting commits allows us to keep merging changes
+from CE into EE, as we never have to wait hours for somebody to resolve a set of
+merge conflicts.
+
+### Does the CE to EE merge take into account merge commits?
+
+No. When merging CE changes into EE, merge commits are ignored.
+
+### My changes are reverted, but I set up an EE MR to resolve conflicts
+
+Most likely the automatic merge job ran before the EE merge request was merged.
+If this keeps happening, consider reporting a bug in the [Merge Train issue
+tracker](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/merge-train/issues).
+
+### My changes keep getting reverted, and this is really annoying!
+
+This is understandable, but the solution to this is fairly straightforward:
+simply set up an EE merge request for every CE merge request, and resolve your
+conflicts before the changes are reverted.
+
+### Will we allow certain people to still merge changes, even if they conflict?
+
+No.
+
+### Some files I work with often conflict, how can I best deal with this?
+
+If you find you keep running into merge conflicts, consider refactoring the file
+so that the EE specific changes are not intertwined with CE code. For Ruby code
+you can do this by moving the EE code to a separate module, which can then be
+injected into the appropriate classes or modules. See [Guidelines for
+implementing Enterprise Edition features](ee_features.md) for more information.
+
+### Will changelog entries be reverted automatically?
+
+Only if the changelog was added in the commit that was reverted. If a changelog
+entry was added in a separate commit, it is possible for it to be left behind.
+Since changelog entries are related to the changes in question, there is no real
+reason to commit the changelog separately, and as such this should not be a big
+problem.