Welcome to mirror list, hosted at ThFree Co, Russian Federation.

gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss.git - Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.
summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/administration/repository_storage_types.md')
-rw-r--r--doc/administration/repository_storage_types.md23
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/doc/administration/repository_storage_types.md b/doc/administration/repository_storage_types.md
index 6ec43a8ce06..a5c323be4ce 100644
--- a/doc/administration/repository_storage_types.md
+++ b/doc/administration/repository_storage_types.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ info: To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated w
type: reference, howto
---
-# Repository storage types **(CORE ONLY)**
+# Repository storage types **(FREE SELF)**
> - [Introduced](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/-/issues/28283) in GitLab 10.0.
> - Hashed storage became the default for new installations in GitLab 12.0
@@ -38,13 +38,13 @@ been disabled.
Hashed storage is the storage behavior we rolled out with 10.0. Instead
of coupling project URL and the folder structure where the repository is
-stored on disk, we are coupling a hash, based on the project's ID. This makes
+stored on disk, we couple a hash based on the project's ID. This makes
the folder structure immutable, and therefore eliminates any requirement to
synchronize state from URLs to disk structure. This means that renaming a group,
user, or project costs only the database transaction, and takes effect
immediately.
-The hash also helps to spread the repositories more evenly on the disk, so the
+The hash also helps spread the repositories more evenly on the disk. The
top-level directory contains fewer folders than the total number of top-level
namespaces.
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ Do not run `git prune` or `git gc` in pool repositories! This can
cause data loss in "real" repositories that depend on the pool in
question.
-Forks of public projects are deduplicated by creating a third repository, the
+Forks of public and internal projects are deduplicated by creating a third repository, the
object pool, containing the objects from the source project. Using
`objects/info/alternates`, the source project and forks use the object pool for
shared objects. Objects are moved from the source project to the object pool
@@ -136,8 +136,8 @@ when housekeeping is run on the source project.
### Hashed storage coverage migration
Files stored in an S3-compatible endpoint do not have the downsides
-mentioned earlier, if they are not prefixed with `#{namespace}/#{project_name}`,
-which is true for CI Cache and LFS Objects.
+mentioned earlier, if they are not prefixed with `#{namespace}/#{project_name}`.
+This is true for CI Cache and LFS Objects.
In the table below, you can find the coverage of the migration to the hashed storage.
@@ -161,7 +161,8 @@ When avatar is replaced, `Upload` model is destroyed and a new one takes place w
#### CI artifacts
-CI Artifacts are S3 compatible since **9.4** (GitLab Premium), and available in GitLab Core since **10.6**.
+CI Artifacts are S3 compatible since **9.4** (GitLab Premium), and available in GitLab Free since
+**10.6**.
#### LFS objects
@@ -194,10 +195,10 @@ reasons, GitLab replicated the same mapping structure from the projects URLs:
- Project's repository: `#{namespace}/#{project_name}.git`
- Project's wiki: `#{namespace}/#{project_name}.wiki.git`
-This structure made it simple to migrate from existing solutions to GitLab and
-easy for Administrators to find where the repository is stored.
+This structure enables you to migrate from existing solutions to GitLab, and
+for Administrators to find where the repository is stored.
-On the other hand this has some drawbacks:
+This approach also has some drawbacks:
Storage location concentrates a huge number of top-level namespaces. The
impact can be reduced by the introduction of
@@ -211,4 +212,4 @@ is at that same URL today.
Any change in the URL needs to be reflected on disk (when groups / users or
projects are renamed). This can add a lot of load in big installations,
-especially if using any type of network based filesystem.
+especially if using any type of network based file system.