Welcome to mirror list, hosted at ThFree Co, Russian Federation.

gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss.git - Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.
summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/architecture/blueprints/cells/cells-feature-schema-changes.md')
-rw-r--r--doc/architecture/blueprints/cells/cells-feature-schema-changes.md56
1 files changed, 56 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/architecture/blueprints/cells/cells-feature-schema-changes.md b/doc/architecture/blueprints/cells/cells-feature-schema-changes.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..d712b24a8a0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/architecture/blueprints/cells/cells-feature-schema-changes.md
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+---
+stage: enablement
+group: Tenant Scale
+description: 'Cells: Schema changes'
+---
+
+<!-- vale gitlab.FutureTense = NO -->
+
+DISCLAIMER:
+This page may contain information related to upcoming products, features and
+functionality. It is important to note that the information presented is for
+informational purposes only, so please do not rely on the information for
+purchasing or planning purposes. Just like with all projects, the items
+mentioned on the page are subject to change or delay, and the development,
+release, and timing of any products, features, or functionality remain at the
+sole discretion of GitLab Inc.
+
+This document is a work-in-progress and represents a very early state of the
+Cells design. Significant aspects are not documented, though we expect to add
+them in the future. This is one possible architecture for Cells, and we intend to
+contrast this with alternatives before deciding which approach to implement.
+This documentation will be kept even if we decide not to implement this so that
+we can document the reasons for not choosing this approach.
+
+# Cells: Schema changes
+
+When we introduce multiple Cells that own their own databases this will
+complicate the process of making schema changes to Postgres and Elasticsearch.
+Today we already need to be careful to make changes comply with our zero
+downtime deployments. For example,
+[when removing a column we need to make changes over 3 separate deployments](../../../development/database/avoiding_downtime_in_migrations.md#dropping-columns).
+We have tooling like `post_migrate` that helps with these kinds of changes to
+reduce the number of merge requests needed, but these will be complicated when
+we are dealing with deploying multiple rails applications that will be at
+different versions at any one time. This problem will be particularly tricky to
+solve for shared databases like our plan to share the `users` related tables
+among all Cells.
+
+A key benefit of Cells may be that it allows us to run different
+customers on different versions of GitLab. We may choose to update our own cell
+before all our customers giving us even more flexibility than our current
+canary architecture. But doing this means that schema changes need to have even
+more versions of backward compatibility support which could slow down
+development as we need extra steps to make schema changes.
+
+## 1. Definition
+
+## 2. Data flow
+
+## 3. Proposal
+
+## 4. Evaluation
+
+## 4.1. Pros
+
+## 4.2. Cons