Welcome to mirror list, hosted at ThFree Co, Russian Federation.

gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss.git - Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.
summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/user/project/labels.md')
-rw-r--r--doc/user/project/labels.md19
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/doc/user/project/labels.md b/doc/user/project/labels.md
index 9cf50d3aaed..f3b59147d5b 100644
--- a/doc/user/project/labels.md
+++ b/doc/user/project/labels.md
@@ -2,13 +2,18 @@
## Overview
-Labels allow you to categorize epics, issues, and merge requests using descriptive titles like
-`bug`, `feature request`, or `docs`, as well as customizable colors. They allow you to quickly
-and dynamically filter and manage epics, issues, and merge requests, and are a key
-part of [issue boards](issue_board.md).
+As your count of issues, merge requests, and epics grows in GitLab, it's more and more challenging
+to keep track of those items. Especially as your organization grows from just a few people to
+hundreds or thousands. This is where labels come in. They help you organize and tag your work
+so you can track and find the work items you're interested in.
-You can use labels to help [search](../search/index.md#issues-and-merge-requests) in
-lists of issues, merge requests, and epics, as well as [search in issue boards](../search/index.md#issue-boards).
+Labels are a key part of [issue boards](issue_board.md). With labels you can:
+
+- Categorize epics, issues, and merge requests using colors and descriptive titles like
+`bug`, `feature request`, or `docs`.
+- Dynamically filter and manage epics, issues, and merge requests.
+- [Search lists of issues, merge requests, and epics](../search/index.md#issues-and-merge-requests),
+ as well as [issue boards](../search/index.md#issue-boards).
## Project labels and group labels
@@ -164,7 +169,7 @@ Suppose you have the labels `workflow::development`, `workflow::review`, and
applied, and a developer wanted to advance the issue to `workflow::review`, they
would simply apply that label, and the `workflow::development` label would
automatically be removed. This behavior already exists when you move issues
-across label lists in an [issue board](issue_board.md#creating-workflows), but
+across label lists in an [issue board](issue_board.md#create-workflows), but
now, team members who may not be working in an issue board directly would still
be able to advance workflow states consistently in issues themselves.