Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
# Conflicts:
# app/assets/stylesheets/framework/nav.scss
# app/assets/stylesheets/pages/environments.scss
# app/views/layouts/nav/_group.html.haml
# app/views/layouts/nav/_project.html.haml
|
|
'master'
Remove 'Leave Project' and 'Leave Group' from settings dropdowns
## What does this MR do?
Removes `Leave Project` and `Leave Group` from the settings dropdown.
Adds it to the `views/shared/members/access_request_buttons.html.haml`.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## Why was this MR needed?
## Screenshots (if relevant)
![Screen_Shot_2016-11-19_at_15.34.26](/uploads/5c66a025513b4780a9e881f0036381e4/Screen_Shot_2016-11-19_at_15.34.26.png)
![Screen_Shot_2016-11-19_at_15.35.29](/uploads/ed74a5dfe982cf65bb49c0c4fb307061/Screen_Shot_2016-11-19_at_15.35.29.png)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #23305
See merge request !7600
|
|
Replace MR access checks with use of MergeRequestsFinder
Split from !2024 to partially solve https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23867
:warning: - Potentially untested
:bomb: - No test coverage
:traffic_light: - Test coverage of some sort exists (a test failed when error raised)
:vertical_traffic_light: - Test coverage of return value (a test failed when nil used)
:white_check_mark: - Permissions check tested
- [x] :bomb: app/finders/notes_finder.rb:17
- [x] :warning: app/views/layouts/nav/_project.html.haml:80 [`.count`]
- [x] :bomb: app/controllers/concerns/creates_commit.rb:84
- [x] :traffic_light: app/controllers/projects/commits_controller.rb:24
- [x] :traffic_light: app/controllers/projects/compare_controller.rb:56
- [x] :vertical_traffic_light: app/controllers/projects/discussions_controller.rb:29
- [x] :white_check_mark: app/controllers/projects/todos_controller.rb:27
- [x] :vertical_traffic_light: app/models/commit.rb:268
- [x] :white_check_mark: lib/gitlab/search_results.rb:71
- [x] https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2024/diffs#d1c10892daedb4d4dd3d4b12b6d071091eea83df_267_266 Memoize ` merged_merge_request(current_user)`
- [x] https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2024/diffs#d1c10892daedb4d4dd3d4b12b6d071091eea83df_248_247 Expected side effect for `merged_merge_request!`, consider `skip_authorization: true`.
- [x] https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2024/diffs#d1c10892daedb4d4dd3d4b12b6d071091eea83df_269_269 Scary use of unchecked `merged_merge_request?`
See merge request !2033
|
|
counter
This is done by:
- Extending the IssuableFinder adding the non_archived option to the params
- Overriding the #filter_params in the MergeRequestsAction
- Passing the non_archived param in the nav/_group.html.haml navbar
partial from the groups/merge_requests.html.haml
|
|
# Conflicts:
# app/assets/stylesheets/framework/nav.scss
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replace issue access checks with use of IssuableFinder
Split from !2024 to partially solve https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23867
## Which fixes are in this MR?
:warning: - Potentially untested
:bomb: - No test coverage
:traffic_light: - Test coverage of some sort exists (a test failed when error raised)
:vertical_traffic_light: - Test coverage of return value (a test failed when nil used)
:white_check_mark: - Permissions check tested
### Issue lookup with access check
Using `visible_to_user` likely makes these security issues too. See [Code smells](#code-smells).
- [x] :vertical_traffic_light: app/finders/notes_finder.rb:15 [`visible_to_user`]
- [x] :traffic_light: app/views/layouts/nav/_project.html.haml:73 [`visible_to_user`] [`.count`]
- [x] :white_check_mark: app/services/merge_requests/build_service.rb:84 [`issue.try(:confidential?)`]
- [x] :white_check_mark: lib/api/issues.rb:112 [`visible_to_user`]
- CHANGELOG: Prevented API returning issues set to 'Only team members' to everyone
- [x] :white_check_mark: lib/api/helpers.rb:126 [`can?(current_user, :read_issue, issue)`] Maybe here too?
- [x] :white_check_mark: lib/gitlab/search_results.rb:53 [`visible_to_user`]
### Previous discussions
- [ ] https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2024/diffs#b2ff264eddf9819d7693c14ae213d941494fe2b3_128_126
- [ ] https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2024/diffs#7b6375270d22f880bdcb085e47b519b426a5c6c7_87_87
See merge request !2031
|
|
Updated specs
|
|
|
|
them [ci skip]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closes #21218
|
|
|
|
Project tools visibility level
## part of #19734
![project_features_access_level](/uploads/81ec7185d4e61d7578652020209af925/project_features_access_level.png)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5606
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closes #19120
|
|
Koding: #index: landing page for Koding integration
If enabled it will provide a link to open remote Koding instance url
for now we are also providing the sneak preview video for how
integration works in detail.
Repository: check whether .koding.yml file exists on repository
Projects: landing page: show Run in IDE (Koding) button if repo has stack file
Projects: MR: show Run in IDE Koding button if repo has stack file on active branch
ProjectHelpers: add_koding_stack: stack generator for provided project
With this helper we will auto-generate the required stack template
for a given project. For the feature we can request this base template
from the running Koding instance on integration.
Currently this will provide users to create a t2.nano instance on aws
and it'll automatically configures the instance for basic requirements.
Projects: empty state and landing page provide shortcuts to create stack
projects_helper: use branch on checkout and provide an entry point
This ${var.koding_queryString_branch} will be replaced with the branch
provided in query string which will allow us to use same stack template
for different branches of the same repository.
ref: https://github.com/koding/koding/pull/8597/commits/b8c0e43c4c24bf132670aa8a3cfb0d634acfd09b
projects_helper: provide sha info in query string to use existing vms
With this change we'll be able to query existing vms on Koding side
based on the commit id that they've created.
ref: https://github.com/koding/koding/pull/8597/commits/1d630fadf31963fa6ccd3bed92e526761a30a343
Integration: Docs: Koding documentation added
Disable /koding route if integration is disabled
Use application settings to enable Koding
Projects_helper: better indentation with strip_heredoc usage
Projects_helper: return koding_url as is if there is no project provided
current_settings: set koding_enabled: false by default
Koding_Controller: to render not_found once integration is disabled
Dashboard_specs: update spec for Koding enabled case
Projects_Helper: make repo dynamic
ref: https://github.com/koding/koding/pull/8597/commits/4d615242f45aaea4c4986be84ecc612b0bb1514c
Updated documentation to have right format
|
|
|
|
Prior, in order to display the correct link to "Issues" in the project
navigation, we were performing a check against the project to see if it
used an external issue tracker, and if so, we used that URL. This was
inefficient.
Now, we simply _always_ link to `namespace_project_issues_path`, and
then in the controller we redirect to the external tracker if it's
present.
This also removes the need for the url_for_issue helper. Bonus! :tada:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remove icons from explore nav
## What does this MR do?
Removes icons from explore `nav/_explore`
## Why was this MR needed?
To match signed-in nav
## Screenshots (if relevant)
Before:
![Screen_Shot_2016-07-20_at_6.39.01_AM](/uploads/9ccc11d151e37a0ef2fab681ccc07efa/Screen_Shot_2016-07-20_at_6.39.01_AM.png)
After:
![Screen_Shot_2016-07-20_at_6.43.15_AM](/uploads/ae058b19cc3c887bccf6c221ac58cfc2/Screen_Shot_2016-07-20_at_6.43.15_AM.png)
See merge request !5362
|
|
|
|
|
|
`gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/pipelines/settings`
|
|
|
|
|
|
new controller action; put badge stuff under builds settings controller action
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
|
|
And create new Project#requesters, Group#requesters scopes.
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'18755-fix-destroy-project-causes-post_decline_request-to-be-executed' into 'master'
Resolve "Destroying a project causes post_decline_request to be executed"
## What does this MR do?
Ensure we don't send "access request declined" to access requesters when a project is deleted.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
I've created a service to decouple the notification sending from the AR model.
## Why was this MR needed?
Because there was an issue.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes #18755, #18750.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] No CHANGELOG needed.
- [x] Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !4744
|
|
Rename Code tab to Repository
As discussed in #18830, this renames the "Code" tab to "Repository".
Screenshot now:
![image](/uploads/a7807dfb5b42f037fe2a44475a4af883/image.png)
See merge request !4807
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
Merge request - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/4799
|
|
|