Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
Edit help text to clarify that tags are annotated.
Closes #24554
See merge request !7553
|
|
'24266-afraid-to-press-the-orange-button-on-merge-request-screen' into 'master'
If Build running change accept merge request when build succeeds button from orange to blue
## What does this MR do?
If Build running change accept merge request when build succeeds button from orange to blue
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
I didn't really check, but to my knowledge these changes should fix it. Would love to know how to set up working pipelines in my local build.
## Why was this MR needed?
orange was to big a warning color for this button
## Screenshots (if relevant)
![image](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/uploads/c9100be272c5567ee4dfa281cffaeb7a/_24266_merge-request-01.png)
![image](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/uploads/bb84ea5b519fc67babf8383f3b396fb7/_24266_merge-request-02.png)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #24266
See merge request !7577
|
|
Sort pipeline graph builds and build groups by name
## What does this MR do?
Sorts builds and build groups by name within pipeline graphs
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Shouldn't be. This was a one-line change.
## Why was this MR needed?
It can be difficult to find the build you are looking for within a group of similarly-named builds when they are in a seemingly random order.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
### Before:
![Screen_Shot_2016-11-22_at_2.48.11_PM](/uploads/27f3f9a2e29e7f0e5857bfd425b74306/Screen_Shot_2016-11-22_at_2.48.11_PM.png)
### After:
![Screen_Shot_2016-11-22_at_2.47.46_PM](/uploads/2c6ef1446a1de0012d091d6deef0992b/Screen_Shot_2016-11-22_at_2.47.46_PM.png)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- Tests
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #24739
See merge request !7681
|
|
Unify all MR widget text colors and background colors
* Removes darker background color for `skipped` status
* Makes all MR widget text gray
Before:
![Screen_Shot_2016-11-18_at_7.52.16_AM](/uploads/4ee715aec9c453c5cfe1f259049adbde/Screen_Shot_2016-11-18_at_7.52.16_AM.png)
After:
![Screen_Shot_2016-11-18_at_7.52.05_AM](/uploads/ea14d713a4e7d837bac4576815451dce/Screen_Shot_2016-11-18_at_7.52.05_AM.png)
Closes #24639
See merge request !7571
|
|
'24161-non-intuitive-buttons-for-import-sources-in-administrator-settings-enable-disable' into 'master'
Import sources buttons to checkboxes
## What does this MR do?
Swaps the `/application_settings` `Import Sources` buttons to checkboxes.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## Why was this MR needed?
## Screenshots (if relevant)
![2016-11-19_14.42.39](/uploads/5bf53ecb54765bd80ab275714208ee9a/2016-11-19_14.42.39.gif)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #24161
See merge request !7598
|
|
|
|
Disabled award emoji button when user is not logged in
## What does this MR do?
The award emoji buttons are now disabled when the user is not signed in, stopping them from clicking it & then getting an error.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
![Screen_Shot_2016-11-22_at_10.25.20](/uploads/210378bde90e689fbc12940ce271c05e/Screen_Shot_2016-11-22_at_10.25.20.png)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #24680
See merge request !7651
|
|
Resolve "Labeling system notes downcase labels"
## What does this MR do?
This MR fixes issues of label gets lowercase in system note as describe in #24737
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
NR
## Why was this MR needed?
This MR fixes the regression of becoming labels and its description and title lowercase in system note
## Screenshots (if relevant)
**Before:**
![before](/uploads/ac99fd5d1219ee3b4b7c699319267087/before.png)
**After:**
![after](/uploads/d1b6413c857d18f122252f421ac498b0/after.png)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #24737
Closes #24751
See merge request !7636
|
|
Last minute CI Style tweaks for 8.14
## What does this MR do?
- Skipped builds now have use a lighter gray.
- Converted all status icons to be managed by scss colors only
- Consolidated all status icon styles into icons.scss
- Deleted any classes or styles within the svg's
- Gave status badges a hover style, but only if clickable
- Fixed alignment issue mini-pipeline graph
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## Why was this MR needed?
As per the discussion in the slack chat https://gitlab.slack.com/archives/ci/p1479743986004879
## Screenshots (if relevant)
- skipped builds:
![image](/uploads/f59c615045472b9b13940463a64c8038/image.png)
![image](/uploads/26503d1da9c93b3c22c5c0c1369feceb/image.png)
- hover style status badges:
![2016-11-22_00.21.27](/uploads/36afa7aa64d60e1755bf39d97f90c59f/2016-11-22_00.21.27.gif)![2016-11-22_00.58.38](/uploads/1d95fa5db124412d3f83b3e79b9b71ec/2016-11-22_00.58.38.gif)
- mini pipeline graph:
before:
![image](/uploads/38e5e57ada3907b17c6e24e1446b4514/image.png)
after:
![image](/uploads/de4476693a1397eebfc680661159daf7/image.png)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
See merge request !7643
|
|
Add help section for MM commands
## What should this MR do
Check @pedroms' design for the Mattermost service screen: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22540
Now this has to be implemented, I've created a clean canvas for you, @lbennett, to draw on.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !7558
|
|
External jobs do not have show page nor traces
Fixes #24677
See merge request !7617
|
|
Closes #24680
|
|
removes unnecessary changelog entry
makes toggle commit list and compare link as secondary
removes unnecessary function call
|
|
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/7617#note_18762971
|
|
Feedback:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/7617#note_18762989
|
|
into 'master'
Restricted visibility buttons to checkboxes
## What does this MR do?
Changes the `Restricted visibility levels` settings to use checkboxes instead of a button group.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## Why was this MR needed?
## Screenshots (if relevant)
![Screen_Shot_2016-11-14_at_19.25.48](/uploads/0c6ee415ee0c89c0a7e3ffd98f88df71/Screen_Shot_2016-11-14_at_19.25.48.png)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #18136
See merge request !7463
|
|
'master'
Issues empty state
## What does this MR do?
Adds the empty state for the project, dashboard and group issues.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## Why was this MR needed?
## Screenshots (if relevant)
### Filtered to show no issues (on group issues page in this case but also dashboard and projects)
![Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.55.56](/uploads/b598af4a8a5e2c9fbb859abf36e70e4b/Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.55.56.png)
### Project with no issues
![Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.57.08](/uploads/8f54fdf1b3101c46299249fa2944207d/Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.57.08.png)
![Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.57.17](/uploads/1d2d162e1d845dd05e945d8ebb1d2101/Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.57.17.png)
### Group with no projects with any issues
![Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.54.55](/uploads/f28dc2038839d5bda0eb37f37927d5db/Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.54.55.png)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [ ] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #20840
Closes #20850
See merge request !7309
|
|
Cycle analytics second iteration frontend
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Mostly typos and code guidelines.
## Why was this MR needed?
This implements the frontend part of !6859 for #23449
## Screenshots
**Initial view**
![Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_5.28.43_PM](/uploads/ff9cfa9c9d6c2da28c24e03e384f89af/Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_5.28.43_PM.png)
**Cycle Analytics with data**
![Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_2.09.24_PM](/uploads/18d9786c090bdd554cf786c879543302/Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_2.09.24_PM.png)
**User doesn't have access for a stage**
![Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_2.11.01_PM](/uploads/d1ea76a63f2de2224954b5f40038c488/Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_2.11.01_PM.png)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #23449
See merge request !7366
|
|
|
|
Make milestone page responsive
Credit to @yury-n for this one. :star: :star2: :star: Original MR: !5255
## What does this MR do?
> Makes the milestone page more mobile friendly
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
> Shouldn't be but maybe double check that the views I changed are exclusively used by the milestone details page I was amending and not any other pages that I haven't tested after my changes.
Looks good to me. :) Would be awesome to have @annabeldunstone check up on the stylesheet updates.
## Why was this MR needed?
> Buttons were misaligned
> Progress bar was not 100% width
> Stats were cut in the middle
> Milestone name/date text overflow
![Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.37.49_PM](/uploads/4da67c9f81d71873188e4a5cafed8113/Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.37.49_PM.png)
![Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.41.58_PM](/uploads/b3d767ce49e37b251c3192ed051400b8/Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.41.58_PM.png)
![Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.46.41_PM](/uploads/353ad59a88f3dea9e3f88e6ea05c1af3/Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.46.41_PM.png)
## Screenshots (if relevant)
![Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_6.15.58_PM](/uploads/a26768701ea6cb00ccd85a5ac0772e36/Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_6.15.58_PM.png)
![Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.57.04_PM](/uploads/b94cf1b7593589948216342b48a19831/Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.57.04_PM.png)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #18852
See merge request !6655
|
|
classes or styles within the svg's, plus gave status badges a hover style only if clickable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evalute time_ago method instead of printing it
![Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_21.00.34](/uploads/295ffa522865fe1865b0c0b552a49ebf/Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_21.00.34.png)
See merge request !7634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resolve "Activity entries are not loaded fully to cover full window's height"
## What does this MR do?
Fixes a bug in which a browser window large enough to encompass the default number of items in an auto-loading endless-scroll list could not trigger the loading of additional items.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
I refactored activities.js and pager.js into es6 syntax while I was investigating the issue. No changes were made other than some es6 flourishes and eslint conformity, so nothing should be effected, but perhaps best to double check other pages which utilize these scripts.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
![endless-scroll-fixed](/uploads/b672b606826af745528c209ab6cfe95c/endless-scroll-fixed.gif)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- Tests
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #24499
See merge request !7608
|
|
|
|
Fix errors happening when source branch of merge request is removed and then restored
See merge request !7568
|
|
checkboxes with icons
Review changes
|
|
|
|
This will be removed until we figure out in what scenario we should display the overview message.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|