Welcome to mirror list, hosted at ThFree Co, Russian Federation.

gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss.git - Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.
summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/app/views
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2016-11-23Add a starting date to milestonesValery Sizov
2016-11-23Merge branch 'dev-issue-24554' into 'master' Sean McGivern
Edit help text to clarify that tags are annotated. Closes #24554 See merge request !7553
2016-11-23Merge branch ↵Fatih Acet
'24266-afraid-to-press-the-orange-button-on-merge-request-screen' into 'master' If Build running change accept merge request when build succeeds button from orange to blue ## What does this MR do? If Build running change accept merge request when build succeeds button from orange to blue ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? I didn't really check, but to my knowledge these changes should fix it. Would love to know how to set up working pipelines in my local build. ## Why was this MR needed? orange was to big a warning color for this button ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![image](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/uploads/c9100be272c5567ee4dfa281cffaeb7a/_24266_merge-request-01.png) ![image](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/uploads/bb84ea5b519fc67babf8383f3b396fb7/_24266_merge-request-02.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #24266 See merge request !7577
2016-11-23Merge branch '24739-collapsed-build-list-sorting' into 'master' Fatih Acet
Sort pipeline graph builds and build groups by name ## What does this MR do? Sorts builds and build groups by name within pipeline graphs ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Shouldn't be. This was a one-line change. ## Why was this MR needed? It can be difficult to find the build you are looking for within a group of similarly-named builds when they are in a seemingly random order. ## Screenshots (if relevant) ### Before: ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-22_at_2.48.11_PM](/uploads/27f3f9a2e29e7f0e5857bfd425b74306/Screen_Shot_2016-11-22_at_2.48.11_PM.png) ### After: ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-22_at_2.47.46_PM](/uploads/2c6ef1446a1de0012d091d6deef0992b/Screen_Shot_2016-11-22_at_2.47.46_PM.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added - Tests - [ ] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #24739 See merge request !7681
2016-11-23Merge branch '24639-mr-widget-updates' into 'master' Fatih Acet
Unify all MR widget text colors and background colors * Removes darker background color for `skipped` status * Makes all MR widget text gray Before: ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-18_at_7.52.16_AM](/uploads/4ee715aec9c453c5cfe1f259049adbde/Screen_Shot_2016-11-18_at_7.52.16_AM.png) After: ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-18_at_7.52.05_AM](/uploads/ea14d713a4e7d837bac4576815451dce/Screen_Shot_2016-11-18_at_7.52.05_AM.png) Closes #24639 See merge request !7571
2016-11-23Merge branch ↵Fatih Acet
'24161-non-intuitive-buttons-for-import-sources-in-administrator-settings-enable-disable' into 'master' Import sources buttons to checkboxes ## What does this MR do? Swaps the `/application_settings` `Import Sources` buttons to checkboxes. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![2016-11-19_14.42.39](/uploads/5bf53ecb54765bd80ab275714208ee9a/2016-11-19_14.42.39.gif) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #24161 See merge request !7598
2016-11-22sort pipeline graph builds and build groups by nameMike Greiling
2016-11-22Merge branch 'emoji-btn-disabled' into 'master' Fatih Acet
Disabled award emoji button when user is not logged in ## What does this MR do? The award emoji buttons are now disabled when the user is not signed in, stopping them from clicking it & then getting an error. ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-22_at_10.25.20](/uploads/210378bde90e689fbc12940ce271c05e/Screen_Shot_2016-11-22_at_10.25.20.png) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #24680 See merge request !7651
2016-11-22Merge branch '24737-labeling-system-notes-downcase-labels' into 'master' Fatih Acet
Resolve "Labeling system notes downcase labels" ## What does this MR do? This MR fixes issues of label gets lowercase in system note as describe in #24737 ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? NR ## Why was this MR needed? This MR fixes the regression of becoming labels and its description and title lowercase in system note ## Screenshots (if relevant) **Before:** ![before](/uploads/ac99fd5d1219ee3b4b7c699319267087/before.png) **After:** ![after](/uploads/d1b6413c857d18f122252f421ac498b0/after.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #24737 Closes #24751 See merge request !7636
2016-11-22Merge branch 'ci-style-tweaks-8.14' into 'master' Annabel Dunstone Gray
Last minute CI Style tweaks for 8.14 ## What does this MR do? - Skipped builds now have use a lighter gray. - Converted all status icons to be managed by scss colors only - Consolidated all status icon styles into icons.scss - Deleted any classes or styles within the svg's - Gave status badges a hover style, but only if clickable - Fixed alignment issue mini-pipeline graph ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? As per the discussion in the slack chat https://gitlab.slack.com/archives/ci/p1479743986004879 ## Screenshots (if relevant) - skipped builds: ![image](/uploads/f59c615045472b9b13940463a64c8038/image.png) ![image](/uploads/26503d1da9c93b3c22c5c0c1369feceb/image.png) - hover style status badges: ![2016-11-22_00.21.27](/uploads/36afa7aa64d60e1755bf39d97f90c59f/2016-11-22_00.21.27.gif)![2016-11-22_00.58.38](/uploads/1d95fa5db124412d3f83b3e79b9b71ec/2016-11-22_00.58.38.gif) - mini pipeline graph: before: ![image](/uploads/38e5e57ada3907b17c6e24e1446b4514/image.png) after: ![image](/uploads/de4476693a1397eebfc680661159daf7/image.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? See merge request !7643
2016-11-22Merge branch 'zj-mattermost-command-help-message' into 'master' Fatih Acet
Add help section for MM commands ## What should this MR do Check @pedroms' design for the Mattermost service screen: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22540 Now this has to be implemented, I've created a clean canvas for you, @lbennett, to draw on. ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !7558
2016-11-22Merge branch 'fix-failed-email-for-external-jobs' into 'master' Kamil Trzciński
External jobs do not have show page nor traces Fixes #24677 See merge request !7617
2016-11-22Disabled award emoji button when user is not logged inPhil Hughes
Closes #24680
2016-11-22resolves lowercase issue in system note for labels, label description and titleNur Rony
removes unnecessary changelog entry makes toggle commit list and compare link as secondary removes unnecessary function call
2016-11-22Move partials to links directory, feedback:Lin Jen-Shin
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/7617#note_18762971
2016-11-22Use local instead of instance variable in partialLin Jen-Shin
Feedback: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/7617#note_18762989
2016-11-22Merge branch '18136-ui-for-restricting-global-visibility-levels-is-unclear' ↵Jacob Schatz
into 'master' Restricted visibility buttons to checkboxes ## What does this MR do? Changes the `Restricted visibility levels` settings to use checkboxes instead of a button group. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-14_at_19.25.48](/uploads/0c6ee415ee0c89c0a7e3ffd98f88df71/Screen_Shot_2016-11-14_at_19.25.48.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #18136 See merge request !7463
2016-11-22Merge branch '20840-getting-started-better-empty-state-for-issues-view' into ↵Jacob Schatz
'master' Issues empty state ## What does this MR do? Adds the empty state for the project, dashboard and group issues. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? ## Screenshots (if relevant) ### Filtered to show no issues (on group issues page in this case but also dashboard and projects) ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.55.56](/uploads/b598af4a8a5e2c9fbb859abf36e70e4b/Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.55.56.png) ### Project with no issues ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.57.08](/uploads/8f54fdf1b3101c46299249fa2944207d/Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.57.08.png) ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.57.17](/uploads/1d2d162e1d845dd05e945d8ebb1d2101/Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.57.17.png) ### Group with no projects with any issues ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.54.55](/uploads/f28dc2038839d5bda0eb37f37927d5db/Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.54.55.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #20840 Closes #20850 See merge request !7309
2016-11-22Merge branch '23449-cycle-analytics-2-frontend' into 'master' Jacob Schatz
Cycle analytics second iteration frontend ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Mostly typos and code guidelines. ## Why was this MR needed? This implements the frontend part of !6859 for #23449 ## Screenshots **Initial view** ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_5.28.43_PM](/uploads/ff9cfa9c9d6c2da28c24e03e384f89af/Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_5.28.43_PM.png) **Cycle Analytics with data** ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_2.09.24_PM](/uploads/18d9786c090bdd554cf786c879543302/Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_2.09.24_PM.png) **User doesn't have access for a stage** ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_2.11.01_PM](/uploads/d1ea76a63f2de2224954b5f40038c488/Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_2.11.01_PM.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #23449 See merge request !7366
2016-11-22additional fixesDimitrie Hoekstra
2016-11-22Merge branch 'yury-n/gitlab-ce-18852-milestone-pages-mobile' into 'master' Jacob Schatz
Make milestone page responsive Credit to @yury-n for this one. :star: :star2: :star: Original MR: !5255 ## What does this MR do? > Makes the milestone page more mobile friendly ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? > Shouldn't be but maybe double check that the views I changed are exclusively used by the milestone details page I was amending and not any other pages that I haven't tested after my changes. Looks good to me. :) Would be awesome to have @annabeldunstone check up on the stylesheet updates. ## Why was this MR needed? > Buttons were misaligned > Progress bar was not 100% width > Stats were cut in the middle > Milestone name/date text overflow ![Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.37.49_PM](/uploads/4da67c9f81d71873188e4a5cafed8113/Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.37.49_PM.png) ![Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.41.58_PM](/uploads/b3d767ce49e37b251c3192ed051400b8/Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.41.58_PM.png) ![Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.46.41_PM](/uploads/353ad59a88f3dea9e3f88e6ea05c1af3/Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.46.41_PM.png) ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_6.15.58_PM](/uploads/a26768701ea6cb00ccd85a5ac0772e36/Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_6.15.58_PM.png) ![Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.57.04_PM](/uploads/b94cf1b7593589948216342b48a19831/Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.57.04_PM.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #18852 See merge request !6655
2016-11-22Converted all status icons to be managed by scss colors only and deleted any ↵Dimitrie Hoekstra
classes or styles within the svg's, plus gave status badges a hover style only if clickable
2016-11-22Swapped buttons for checkboxesLuke "Jared" Bennett
2016-11-22Add custom copy for each empty stageAlfredo Sumaran
2016-11-22Frontend review changesLuke "Jared" Bennett
2016-11-22Scroll CA stage panel on mobileAnnabel Dunstone Gray
2016-11-22Merge branch 'zj-fix-time-ago-tooltip-chat-names' into 'master' Kamil Trzciński
Evalute time_ago method instead of printing it ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_21.00.34](/uploads/295ffa522865fe1865b0c0b552a49ebf/Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_21.00.34.png) See merge request !7634
2016-11-22Fix CSS declarationAlfredo Sumaran
2016-11-22administer to administratorAlfredo Sumaran
2016-11-21No enough data to Not enough dataAlfredo Sumaran
2016-11-21Merge branch '24499-fix-activity-autoload-on-large-viewports' into 'master' Fatih Acet
Resolve "Activity entries are not loaded fully to cover full window's height" ## What does this MR do? Fixes a bug in which a browser window large enough to encompass the default number of items in an auto-loading endless-scroll list could not trigger the loading of additional items. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? I refactored activities.js and pager.js into es6 syntax while I was investigating the issue. No changes were made other than some es6 flourishes and eslint conformity, so nothing should be effected, but perhaps best to double check other pages which utilize these scripts. ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![endless-scroll-fixed](/uploads/b672b606826af745528c209ab6cfe95c/endless-scroll-fixed.gif) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added - Tests - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #24499 See merge request !7608
2016-11-21Evalute time_ago method instead of printing itZ.J. van de Weg
2016-11-21Merge branch 'hide-empty-merge-request-diffs' into 'master' Sean McGivern
Fix errors happening when source branch of merge request is removed and then restored See merge request !7568
2016-11-21Removed button styling from restricted visibility levels and added ↵Luke "Jared" Bennett
checkboxes with icons Review changes
2016-11-21Do not show overview message if there’s already CA dataAlfredo Sumaran
2016-11-21Remove unnecesary variableAlfredo Sumaran
This will be removed until we figure out in what scenario we should display the overview message.
2016-11-21Add view to handle the case when user doesn’t have access to stageAlfredo Sumaran
2016-11-21Remove unnecesary empty dialogAlfredo Sumaran
2016-11-21Add overview view for Cycle AnalyticsAlfredo Sumaran
2016-11-21Fix empty stage presentationAlfredo Sumaran
2016-11-21Delete StageButton componentAlfredo Sumaran
2016-11-21Use stage description form endpoint responseAlfredo Sumaran
2016-11-21Provide stage legend on server responseAlfredo Sumaran
2016-11-21Remove delta column and use stage data from responseAlfredo Sumaran
2016-11-21Show friendly message when stage has no dataAlfredo Sumaran
2016-11-21Set stage descriptions dynamicallyAlfredo Sumaran
2016-11-21Move templates to its corresponding componentAlfredo Sumaran
2016-11-21Apply styling to ItemCommitComponentAlfredo Sumaran
2016-11-21Move StagePlanComponent template to component in JS fileAlfredo Sumaran
2016-11-21Move StageIssueComponent template to component in JS fileAlfredo Sumaran