| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
* upstream/master: (206 commits)
Implement fourth round of comments from @DouweM.
Fix `CreateDeploymentService` spec.
Reload issues in spec to ensure label<->issue mapping properly loaded
Fix build.
Remove unnecessary #{} in cycle analytics template.
Update cycle analytics icon and fix color of the dismiss button.
Use triple dashes for the empty value in cycle analytics.
Fix typo on cycle analytics copy.
Add page title and fix sub menu width in Cycle Analytics page.
Update Cycle Analytics Read more link URL.
Display the cycle analytics navbar based on the `:read_cycle_analytics` ability.
Improve indentation in `Gitlab::Database::Median`
Add a spec for merge request metric caching while refreshing a merge request from a forked project.
Use the `IssuableBaseService` lifecycle hooks to cache `MergeRequestsClosingIssues`
Implement a second round of review comments from @DouweM.
Add docs on Cycle Analytics
Test if issue authors can access private projects
Update .pkgr.yml with Ubuntu 16.04 dependencies
fix issues mr counter
Move JSON generation (cycle analytics) into a controller method.
...
|
|
So that we could read last few lines rather than read
the entire file which could be huge.
|
|
|
|
Cycle Analytics: first iteration
## What does this MR do?
- Implement the first iteration of the "Cycle Analytics" feature.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
- Closes #21170
## Screenshots
## Backend Tasks
- [x] Implementation
- [x] Phases
- [x] Issue (Tracker)
- [x] Plan (Board)
- [x] Code (IDE)
- [x] Test (CI)
- [x] Review (MR)
- [x] Staging (CD)
- [x] Production (Total)
- [x] Make heuristics more modular
- [x] Scope to project
- [x] Date range (30 days, 90 days)
- [x] Access restriction
- [x] Test
- [x] Find a better way to test these phases
- [x] Phases
- [x] Issue (Tracker)
- [x] Plan (Board)
- [x] Code (IDE)
- [x] Test (CI)
- [x] Review (MR)
- [x] Staging (CD)
- [x] Production (Total)
- [x] Test for "end case happens before start case"
- [x] Consolidate helper
- [x] Miniboss review
- [x] Performance testing with mock data
- [x] Improve performance
- [x] Pre-calculate "merge requests closing issues
- [x] Pre-calculate everything else
- [x] Test performance against 10k issues
- [x] Test all pre-calculation code
- [x] Ci::Pipeline -> build start/finish
- [x] Ci::Pipeline#merge_requests
- [x] Issue -> record default metrics after save
- [x] MergeRequest -> record default metrics after save
- [x] Deployment -> Update "first_deployed_to_production_at" for MR metrics
- [x] Git Push -> Update "first commit mention" for issue metrics
- [x] Merge request create/update/refresh -> Update "merge requests closing issues"
- [x] Remove `MergeRequestsClosingIssues` when necessary
- [x] Changes to unblock Fatih
- [x] Add summary data
- [x] `stats` should be array
- [x] Let `stats` be `null` if all `stats` are null
- [x] Indexes for "merge requests closing issues"
- [x] Test summary data
- [x] Scope everything to project
- [x] Find out why tests were passing
- [x] Filter should include issues/MRs which have made it to production within the range
- [x] Don't create duplicate `MergeRequestsClosingIssues`
- [x] Fix tests
- [x] MySQL median
- [x] Assign to Douwe for review
- [x] Fix conflicts
- [x] Implement suggestions from Yorick's review
- [x] Test on PG
- [x] Test on MySQL
- [x] Refactor
- [x] Cleanup
- [x] What happens if we have no data at all?
- [x] Extract common queries to methods / scopes
- [x] Remove unused queries
- [x] Downtime for foreign key migrations
- [x] Find a way around "if issue.metrics.present?" all over the place
- [x] Find a way around "if merge_request.metrics.present?" all over the place
- [x] Test migrations on a fresh database
- [x] MySQL
- [x] Pg
- [x] Access issues
- While the project is public and the visibility is set to "Everyone with access", you cannot visit the cycle analytics page when signed out.
- [x] CHANGELOG
- [x] Implement suggestions from Douwe's review
- [x] First set of comments
- [x] Second set of comments
- [x] Third set of comments
- [x] Fourth set of comments
- [x] Make sure build is green
- [ ] Make issue for "polish"
- [ ] EE MR
See merge request !5986
|
|
- Pluralize summary titles
- Remove the `run_query` method - always return sql strings from the
`date_time_sql` methods
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from a forked project.
|
|
`MergeRequestsClosingIssues`
- Instead of overriding `create` and `update` in `MergeRequests::BaseService`
- Get all merge request service specs passing
|
|
- Don't use `TableReferences` - using `.arel_table` is shorter!
- Move some database-related code to `Gitlab::Database`
- Remove the `MergeRequest#issues_closed` and
`Issue#closed_by_merge_requests` associations. They were either
shadowing or were too similar to existing methods. They are not being
used anywhere, so it's better to remove them to reduce confusion.
- Use Rails 3-style validations
- Index for `MergeRequest::Metrics#first_deployed_to_production_at`
- Only include `CycleAnalyticsHelpers::TestGeneration` for specs that
need it.
- Other minor refactorings.
|
|
Fixed slash commands not loading
## What does this MR do?
Fixes an issue with slash commands not working when the autocomplete source is loading & then the new issue button is clicked. This also fixes an issue where the autocomplete source is loaded on pages where it isn't actually needed.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #21774, #21807
See merge request !6207
|
|
Fix issues with wrong issues/merge request counts when filters are selected
Closes #15356 plus counter for issues and MR are now displayed for the these paths `https://gitlab.com/groups/group-name/issues` `https://gitlab.com/groups/group-name/merge_requests` `https://gitlab.com/dashboard/issues` and `https://gitlab.com/dashboard/merge_requests`
See merge request !4960
|
|
Add optional 'author' param when making commits
This fulfills https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/20789 by adding the ability to specify a user's ID to be used as the author of a commit.
Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/20789
See merge request !5822
|
|
Fix note form hint showing slash commands supported for commits
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #22218
See merge request !6368
|
|
|
|
Fix processing of events when build finished.
Update pipeline after processing builds. Otherwise we can get into scenario where pipeline will be marked as running.
This solves a quite significant regression in Pipeline processing.
Proper fix is to move all this to Sidekiq Worker and process pipeline there.
I'll do it after 8.12 release.
See merge request !6410
|
|
Helper methods are meant for views
|
|
Render stages in valid order
Currently stages in stages dropdown on builds page are not in valid order. It is important to display stages in other those are defined in the pipeline.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/21133
See merge request !6430
|
|
And `scss_lint`
|
|
- Move things common to `Issue` and `MergeRequest` into `Issuable`
- Move more database-specific functions into `Gitlab::Database`
- Indentation changes and other minor refactorings.
|
|
|
|
Lets the user choose a namespace and name on Github imports
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/14971
See merge request !5728
|
|
Notes::SlashCommandsService
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
|
Frontend for Merge Request Diff
This merge request improves the UX for the merge request diff feature which was recently implemented here (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/6127). Specifically, it styles various parts of the diff feature to match the designs, it disables comment-related buttons in states where comments are disabled, and it adds a 'Show latest version' button for convenience.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
I could use feedback on this MR's fidelity to the design.
## Why was this MR needed?
Neccessary styling improvements for basic UX of this feature, and enabled comment buttons are not functional and thus need to be disabled in certain states.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/21427
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/6127
cc: @jschatz1
See merge request !6343
|
|
Fix "Unsubscribe" link in notification emails that is triggered by anti-virus
## What does this MR do?
* The unsubscribe link in an email body only unsubscribes automatically when logged in, otherwise the user is asked for a confirmation.
* The unsubscribe link in an email header unsubscribes automatically whether logged in or not.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
This addresses all the comments from https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5241, I think!
## Why was this MR needed?
People were getting unsubscribed automatically by AV software.
## Screenshot
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes #17198.
See merge request !6223
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Public projects - anyone can access
- Private projects - any member (guest level and above) can access
|
|
Hide jump to next discussion button on commit notes
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #22354
See merge request !6428
|
|
1. Change multiple updates to a single `update_all`
2. Use cascading deletes
3. Extract an average function for the database median.
4. Move database median to `lib/gitlab/database`
5. Use `delete_all` instead of `destroy_all`
6. Minor refactoring
|
|
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
|
|
|
Reduce duplication in AkismetService
See merge request !6362
|
|
|
|
LFS support for ssh enabled
## What does this MR do?
This is follow-up after https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/6043 which is falsely shown as merged due to: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22334
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## Why was this MR needed?
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
See merge request !6413
|
|
|
|
Closes #22354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
