| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
Stop using two separate lists for the conditions which files require a
database review.
Related discussion:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/30156#note_187732053
|
|
If an MR only changes files within `doc/` we can save valueable CI time
by prepending a branch name with `docs-`. This danger rule helps educate
people about that fact.
On the other hand, if someone has a branch with a `docs` prefix or
suffix, the branch shouldn't contain any changes outside of the `docs`
directory
|
|
|
|
This backports all EE schema changes to CE, including EE migrations,
ensuring both use the same schema.
== Updated tests
A spec related to ghost and support bot users had to be modified to make
it pass. The spec in question assumes that the "support_bot" column
exists when defining the spec. In the single codebase setup this is not
the case, as the column is backported in a later migration. Any attempt
to use a different schema version or use of "around" blocks to
conditionally disable specs won't help, as reverting the backport
migration would also drop the "support_bot" column. Removing the
"support_bot" tests entirely appears to be the only solution.
We also need to update some foreign key tests now that we have
backported the EE columns. Fortunately, these changes are very minor.
== Backporting migrations
This commit moves EE specific migrations (except those for the Geo
tracking database) and related files to CE, and also removes any traces
of the ee/db directory.
Some migrations had to be modified or removed, as they no longer work
with the schema being backported. These migrations were all quite old,
so we opted for removing them where modifying them would take too much
time and effort.
Some old migrations were modified in EE, while also existing in CE. In
these cases we took the EE code, and in one case removed them entirely.
It's not worth spending time trying to merge these changes somehow as we
plan to remove old migrations around the release of 12.0, see
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/59177 for more details.
|
|
Excludes MR author from gitlab_ui and single_codebase Review roulette
results.
|
|
A colon-emoji like :100: can be valid in the case where we're talking
about the GitLab feature that processes these into emojis. It's fine to
warn about those, but failing the pipeline is too restrictive.
|
|
reviewers.
|
|
|
|
So it's more modular and extensible
|
|
|
|
This would return `people.size` before, when it should return `nil`.
|
|
|
|
This commit adds a rule to Danger that warns the developer when their MR
includes changes to a CE .vue file that has a counterpart in the
EE repo or vice-versa.
|
|
Change reviewer roulette to always pick the same reviewers for the same
branch name. We do this by:
1. Making the branch name 'canonical' across CE and EE by stripping a
leading 'ce-' or 'ee-' and a trailing '-ce' or '-ee'. If people are
following our branch naming guidelines, this should give the same
branch name in both repos.
2. Converting the branch name to a stable integer by taking the integer
form of its MD5.
3. Passing that integer as a seed to Ruby's `Random` class, which 'may
be used to ensure repeatable sequences of pseudo-random numbers
between different runs of the program' (from the Ruby documentation).
The upshot is that the same branch name (in CE and EE) should always
pick the same reviewers, and those should be evenly distributed across
the set of possible reviewers due to the use of MD5.
|
|
|
|
Trainee maintainers count as reviewers, but should get more reviews than
most reviewers, as they need practice to become a maintainer. This makes
them three times as likely to be picked (compared to another reviewer;
compared to before, it's roughly twice as likely at the current numbers
for each).
Also, switch to `Array#sample` because I think it looks nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This extends Danger so it informs MR authors that single codebase merge
requests need to be approved by a specific group of engineers.
Co-authored-by: Yorick Peterse <yorickpeterse@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
Template and process improvements for documentation
See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab-ce!24315
|
|
This introduces additional method for linting,
to reduce the complexity of `lint_commits`.
|
|
|
|
# Conflicts:
# .gitlab/merge_request_templates/Documentation.md
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make danger pick reviewers and maintainers at random, for feontend,
backend, database, etc, changes, whenever files belonging to those
teams get changed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Also pulls URLs into vars
|
|
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
|
Rename ~Packaging label to ~Package
|
|
Add danger check for duplicate yarn dependencies
Closes #51226
See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab-ce!21591
|
|
This danger check utilises `yarn-deduplicate` in order to show duplicate
dependencies in the yarn.lock dependency tree.
Often when introducing new dependencies or updating existing ones, yarn
does not seem to build the most optimal dependency tree.
In order to prevent those unnecessary dependency updates we are nudging
developers and maintainers to resolve these issues in MRs. Automating
this with danger especially helps, as yarn.lock files are not that easy
to review.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Namely the `ci-build` and `meta` labels.
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This adds a Danger check to produce a warning for MR titles greater than
72 characters. This is necessary because when squash on merge is used,
the MR title will be used for the commit message (at least by default).
This in turn leads to commit messages that violate our commit message
guidelines.
For more information, refer to
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/release/framework/issues/24.
|
|
We have a Danger check that warns if you made changes in app/ but not in
spec/. However, this only checked for changed files - not new files. If
you added an app file with no specs, it wouldn't warn; and it would warn
erroneously if you added a missing spec file while changing a file in
app/.
|
