Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
|
into 'master'
Resolve "Add extra functionality for the top right Plus Button"
Closes #23603
See merge request !11632
|
|
|
|
Checks for creating new issue
Styling of .dropdown-bold-header
Fixed Spinach Tests to limit them to the main content area for clicking 'New Project' etc. so that they don't click the dropdown menu
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/27655
|
|
|
|
Hover and then click seems to make this work more reliably.
Closes #30399
|
|
Some discussion,
https://gitlab.slack.com/archives/C0GQHHPGW/p1490398531185144
-> MR to fix failing emoji test:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/10230
|
|
- gl_emoji for falling back to image/css-sprite when the browser
doesn't support an emoji
- Markdown rendering (Banzai filter)
- Autocomplete
- Award emoji menu
- Perceived perf
- Immediate response because we now build client-side
- Update `digests.json` generation in gemojione rake task to be more
useful and include `unicodeVersion`
MR: !9437
See issues
- #26371
- #27250
- #22474
|
|
add /award slash command; Allow posting of just an emoji in comment
|
|
Fixed delete labels not working
Review changes
|
|
Added new spec step
Added empty state to dashboard
Split empty and filtered empty states
Moved empty_state icons into their own folder and DRY up empty state html
Fixed failing spec
Added to groups page
Review changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Truncated long user lists in award emoji tooltips
## What does this MR do?
Truncates award emoji tooltips so that they only show 10 users maximum.
Further users are indicated by appending "and X more."
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Is 10 too little, should it be raised?
My test cases rely on join() to build the expected output.
This feels a little iffy is it alright?
## Why was this MR needed?
Some issues have a large number of thumbs causing tooltips to be very large.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
closes #18334, closes #19542
## Screenshots (if relevant)
##### Before
![Screenshot_from_2016-06-20_19-49-12](/uploads/d7a14dd87bb3da2acd7c0818de99852b/Screenshot_from_2016-06-20_19-49-12.png)
##### After
![Screenshot_from_2016-06-20_19-50-58](/uploads/f7f05c44594bfe8cec7dfd48802753a6/Screenshot_from_2016-06-20_19-50-58.png)
Truncation point modified for purposes of screenshot
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- [x] Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !4780
|
|
This older spec was failing: features/project/issues/issues.feature
Looks like before we were doing an exact match for queries, that's why
it was passing with this existing issue: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/59fa031e6f7d5a1b658c370f581c4caaf4493150/features/project/issues/issues.feature#L128
Failed build: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/builds/3178231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This reverts merge request !5290
|
|
This reverts merge request !4970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix grammar and wording in text on various pages.
## What does this MR do?
Fixes various grammatical and/or wording issues I found while copyediting on the plane :)
## Why was this MR needed?
Incorrect grammar and weird/confusing wording makes the product look less polished and professional.
See merge request !4237
|
|
|
|
Also removes the note from the development/testing.md guide
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mutliple label filter
Fixes #989
See merge request !3438
|
|
|
|
These were being blocked by adblocks
Closes #15043
|
|
|
|
These tests would check if the "This project is empty" banner would
contain SSH clone URLs. Oddly enough this should have never passed (as
far as I can tell) as SSH clone URLs in this banner are _only_ displayed
if the current user has at least 1 SSH key attached. Since the tests
never seem to create any they never should have passed, yet somehow they
did. To solve this the Spinach tests in question now ensure at least 1
SSH key is present.
|
|
Similar to ad90dba5185e30883d5ad6008c166b0df0108ebf we always have a
repository in the real world, so let's also create one in our Spinach
tests.
|
|
before the search field is focused
|
|
Closes #14129
|
|
Updated UI of award emoji
Closes #13878
See merge request !3028
|