| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replaces all the explicit include metadata syntax in the specs (tag:
true) into the implicit one (:tag).
Added a cop to prevent future errors and handle autocorrection.
|
|
The following optimizations were performed:
- Add new association to GroupMember and ProjectMember
This new association will allow us to check if a user is a member of a
Project or Group through a single query instead of two.
- Optimize retrieving of Members when adding multiple Users
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
|
services: true, no_db: true, api: true
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
Closes #23150
|
|
required
|
|
Fortunately, only specs needed to be fixed, so that's good!
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
|
'21983-member-add_user-doesn-t-detect-existing-members-that-have-requested-access' into 'master'
Resolve "`Member.add_user`doesn't detect existing members that have requested access"
## What does this MR do?
This merge request handle the case when an access requester is added to a group or project (via the members page or the API).
In `Member.add_user`, if an access requester already exists, we simply accept their request (and set the `created_by`, `access_level` and `expires_at` attributes if given).
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
I've taken the opportunity to cleanup the whole `{Group,Project}Member.add_user*` methods since it was quite a mess.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #21983
See merge request !6393
|
|
Changes include:
- Ensure Member.add_user is not called directly when not necessary
- New GroupMember.add_users_to_group to have the same abstraction level as for Project
- Refactor Member.add_user to take a source instead of an array of members
- Fix Rubocop offenses
- Always use Project#add_user instead of project.team.add_user
- Factorize users addition as members in Member.add_users_to_source
- Make access_level a keyword argument in GroupMember.add_users_to_group and ProjectMember.add_users_to_projects
- Destroy any requester before adding them as a member
- Improve the way we handle access requesters in Member.add_user
Instead of removing the requester and creating a new member,
we now simply accepts their access request. This way, they will
receive a "access request granted" email.
- Fix error that was previously silently ignored
- Stop raising when access level is invalid in Member, let Rails validation do their work
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
|
An unapproved access request should not give access rights, and blocked users
should not be considered members of anything.
One visible outcome of this behaviour is that owners and masters of a group or
project may be blocked, yet still receive notification emails for access
requests. This commit prevents this from happening.
|
|
|
|
Also, mutualize AccessRequests and Members endpoints for Group &
Project.
New API documentation for the AccessRequests endpoints.
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
|
|
|
|
|
And create new Project#requesters, Group#requesters scopes.
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
|
This is to ensure we don't send unwanted notifications when deleting a
project. In other words, stop abusing AR callbacks and use services.
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
|
+ Move 'Edit Project/Group' out of membership-related partial
+ Show the access request buttons only to logged-in users
+ Put the request access buttons out of in a more visible button
+ Improve the copy in the #remove_member_message helper
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
|
In 8278b763d96ef10c6494409b18b7eb541463af29 the default behaviour of annotation
has changes, which was causing a lot of noise in diffs. We decided in #17382
that it is better to get rid of the whole annotate gem, and instead let people
look at schema.rb for the columns in a table.
Fixes: #17382
|
|
Also:
- Get rid of legacy :strict_mode
- Get rid of custom :email validator
- Add some shared examples to spec emails validation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
