| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Update diff discussion position per discussion instead of per note
Closes #33157
See merge request !11833
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clean up diff rendering
See merge request !11390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix conflict resolution from corrupted upstream
Closes gitlab-ee#2128
See merge request !11298
|
|
I don't know why this happens exactly, but given an upstream and fork repository
from a customer, both of which required GC, resolving conflicts would corrupt
the fork so badly that it couldn't be cloned.
This isn't a perfect fix for that case, because the MR may still need to be
merged manually, but it does ensure that the repository is at least usable.
My best guess is that when we generate the index for the conflict
resolution (which we previously did in the target project), we obtain a
reference to an OID that doesn't exist in the source, even though we already
fetch the refs from the target into the source.
Explicitly setting the source project as the place to get the merge index from
seems to prevent repository corruption in this way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
versions
|
|
The problem is that we often go via a diff object constructed from the diffs
stored in the DB. Those diffs, by definition, don't overflow, so we don't have
access to the 'correct' `real_size` - that is stored on the MR diff object
iself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The `ReferenceExtractor` would return an array of `ExternalIssue`
objects, and then perform `Array#-` to remove the issues
closed. `ExternalIssue`s had `==` defined, but not `hash` or `eql?`,
which are used by `Array#-`.
|
|
Rename column in the database
Rename fields related to import/export feature
Rename API endpoints
Rename documentation links
Rename the rest of occurrences in the code
Replace the images that contain the words "build succeeds" and docs referencing to them
Make sure pipeline is green and nothing is missing.
updated doc images
renamed only_allow_merge_if_build_succeeds in projects and fixed references
more updates
fix some spec failures
fix rubocop offences
fix v3 api spec
fix MR specs
fixed issues with partials
fix MR spec
fix alignment
add missing v3 to v4 doc
wip - refactor v3 endpoints
fix specs
fix a few typos
fix project specs
copy entities fully to V3
fix entity error
more fixes
fix failing specs
fixed missing entities in V3 API
remove comment
updated code based on feedback
typo
fix spec
|
|
Previously, we created an unmergeable todo when a merge request:
1. Had merge when pipeline succeeds set.
2. Became unmergeable.
However, when merge when pipeline succeeds fails due to unmergeability,
the flag isn't actually removed. And a merge request can become
unmergeable multiple times, as every time the target branch is updated
we need to re-check the mergeable status. This means that if the todo
was marked done, and the MR was checked again, a new todo would be
created for the same event.
Instead of checking this, we should create the todo from the service
responsible for merging when the pipeline succeeds. That way the todo is
guaranteed to only be created when we care about it.
|
|
This was wrong when there were over 100 files in the diff, because we
did not use the same diff options as subclasses of
`Gitlab::Diff::FileCollection::Base` when getting the raw diffs. (The
reason we don't use those classes directly is because they may perform
highlighting, which isn't needed for just counting the diffs.)
|
|
pass in current_user in MergeRequest and MergeRequestsHelper
See merge request !8624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#cache_merge_request_closes_issues! and #issues_mentioned_but_not_closing
|
|
|
|
Notify the user who set auto-merge when merge is not possible
Closes #23524
See merge request !8056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also added relevant specs and refactored to_references in a bunch of places to be more consistent.
|
|
issues on MergeRequest#issues_mentioned_but_not_closing
|
|
match existing text generated by the system
|
|
MergeRequest#merge_commit_message so closes issues references are not duplicated
|
|
|
|
merge_request_spec.rb
|
|
MergeRequest#issues_mentioned_but_not_closing
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix missing Note access checks in by moving Note#search to updated NoteFinder
Split from !2024 to partially solve https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23867
## Which fixes are in this MR?
:warning: - Potentially untested
:bomb: - No test coverage
:traffic_light: - Test coverage of some sort exists (a test failed when error raised)
:vertical_traffic_light: - Test coverage of return value (a test failed when nil used)
:white_check_mark: - Permissions check tested
### Note lookup without access check
- [x] :white_check_mark: app/finders/notes_finder.rb:13 :download_code check
- [x] :white_check_mark: app/finders/notes_finder.rb:19 `SnippetsFinder`
- [x] :white_check_mark: app/models/note.rb:121 [`Issue#visible_to_user`]
- [x] :white_check_mark: lib/gitlab/project_search_results.rb:113
- This is the only use of `app/models/note.rb:121` above, but importantly has no access checks at all. This means it leaks MR comments and snippets when those features are `team-only` in addition to the issue comments which would be fixed by `app/models/note.rb:121`.
- It is only called from SearchController where `can?(current_user, :download_code, @project)` is checked, so commit comments are not leaked.
### Previous discussions
- [x] https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2024/diffs#b915c5267a63628b0bafd23d37792ae73ceae272_13_13 `: download_code` check on commit
- [x] https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2024/diffs#b915c5267a63628b0bafd23d37792ae73ceae272_19_19 `SnippetsFinder` should be used
- `SnippetsFinder` should check if the snippets feature is enabled -> https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/25223
### Acceptance criteria met?
- [x] Tests added for new code
- [x] TODO comments removed
- [x] Squashed and removed skipped tests
- [x] Changelog entry
- [ ] State Gitlab versions affected and issue severity in description
- [ ] Create technical debt issue for NotesFinder.
- Either split into `NotesFinder::ForTarget` and `NotesFinder::Search` or consider object per notable type such as `NotesFinder::OnIssue`. For the first option could create `NotesFinder::Base` which is either inherited from or which can be included in the other two.
- Avoid case statement anti-pattern in this finder with use of `NotesFinder::OnCommit` etc. Consider something on the finder for this? `Model.finder(user, project)`
- Move `inc_author` to the controller, and implement `related_notes` to replace `non_diff_notes`/`mr_and_commit_notes`
See merge request !2035
|
|
Create an issue for all unresolved discussions in an MR
See merge request !7180
|
|
GLM shorthand reference for projects from the same namespace
Closes #21679
See merge request !7255
|
