| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Updated tests
|
|
Added tests
Added awesomeeeeee icons
|
|
Add missing values to linter (`only`, `except`) and add new one `Environment`
Closes #21744
See merge request !6276
|
|
Before rendering `show` template we close open merge request without source project. This way there is no need to render `invalid` template. I think that it's better solution than !6383
See merge request !6478
|
|
Take filters in account in issuable counters
## What does this MR do?
This merge request ensure we display issuable counters that take in account all the selected filters, solving #15356.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
There was an issue (#22414) in the original implementation (!4960) when more than one label was selected because calling `#count` when the ActiveRecordRelation contains a `.group` returns an OrderedHash. This merge request relies on [how Kaminari handle this case](https://github.com/amatsuda/kaminari/blob/master/lib/kaminari/models/active_record_relation_methods.rb#L24-L30).
A few things to note:
- The `COUNT` query issued by Kaminari for the pagination is now cached because it's already run by `ApplicationHelper#state_filters_text_for`, so in the end we issue one less SQL query than before;
- In the case when more than one label are selected, the `COUNT` queries return an OrderedHash in the form `{ ISSUABLE_ID => COUNT_OF_SELECTED_FILTERS }` on which `#count` is called: this drawback is already in place (for instance when loading https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues?scope=all&state=all&utf8=%E2%9C%93&label_name%5B%5D=bug&label_name%5B%5D=regression) since that's how Kaminari solves this, **the difference is that now we do that two more times for the two states that are not currently selected**. I will let the ~Performance team decide if that's something acceptable or not, otherwise we will have to find another solution...
- The queries that count the # of issuable are a bit more complex than before, from:
```
(0.6ms) SELECT COUNT(*) FROM "issues" WHERE "issues"."deleted_at" IS NULL AND "issues"."project_id" = $1 AND ("issues"."state" IN ('opened','reopened')) [["project_id", 2]]
(0.2ms) SELECT COUNT(*) FROM "issues" WHERE "issues"."deleted_at" IS NULL AND "issues"."project_id" = $1 AND ("issues"."state" IN ('closed')) [["project_id", 2]]
(0.2ms) SELECT COUNT(*) FROM "issues" WHERE "issues"."deleted_at" IS NULL AND "issues"."project_id" = $1 [["project_id", 2]]
```
to
```
(0.7ms) SELECT COUNT(*) AS count_all, "issues"."id" AS issues_id FROM "issues" INNER JOIN "label_links" ON "label_links"."target_id" = "issues"."id" AND "label_links"."target_type" = $1 INNER JOIN "labels" ON "labels"."id" = "label_links"."label_id" WHERE "issues"."deleted_at" IS NULL AND ("issues"."state" IN ('opened','reopened')) AND "issues"."project_id" = 2 AND "labels"."title" IN ('bug', 'discussion') AND "labels"."project_id" = 2 GROUP BY "issues"."id" HAVING COUNT(DISTINCT labels.title) = 2 [["target_type", "Issue"]]
(0.5ms) SELECT COUNT(*) AS count_all, "issues"."id" AS issues_id FROM "issues" INNER JOIN "label_links" ON "label_links"."target_id" = "issues"."id" AND "label_links"."target_type" = $1 INNER JOIN "labels" ON "labels"."id" = "label_links"."label_id" WHERE "issues"."deleted_at" IS NULL AND ("issues"."state" IN ('closed')) AND "issues"."project_id" = 2 AND "labels"."title" IN ('bug', 'discussion') AND "labels"."project_id" = 2 GROUP BY "issues"."id" HAVING COUNT(DISTINCT labels.title) = 2 [["target_type", "Issue"]]
(0.5ms) SELECT COUNT(*) AS count_all, "issues"."id" AS issues_id FROM "issues" INNER JOIN "label_links" ON "label_links"."target_id" = "issues"."id" AND "label_links"."target_type" = $1 INNER JOIN "labels" ON "labels"."id" = "label_links"."label_id" WHERE "issues"."deleted_at" IS NULL AND "issues"."project_id" = 2 AND "labels"."title" IN ('bug', 'discussion') AND "labels"."project_id" = 2 GROUP BY "issues"."id" HAVING COUNT(DISTINCT labels.title) = 2 [["target_type", "Issue"]]
```
- We could cache the counters for a few minutes? The key could be `PROJECT_ID-ISSUABLE_TYPE-PARAMS`.
A few possible arguments in favor of "it's an acceptable solution":
- most of the time people filter with a single label => no performance problem here
- when filtering with more than one label, usually the result set is reduced, limiting the performance issues
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #15356
See merge request !6496
|
|
Expose the Koding application settings in the API
## Why was this MR needed?
When saving the GitLab application secrets in Koding, and authorising your admin user to have access to the UI, we want to let Koding enable the integration, and populate the url in GitLab for the user.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22705
See merge request !6555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
|
|
|
|
|
This MR fixes a bug that unnecessary escapes reserved HTML characters for Milestone's title. See #22452.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
- Unescaping of sanitized milestone title before it is being stored in the database. See `Milestone#title` and a private method called `Milestone#sanitize_title`
- Sufficient tests were added (Model and API tests were modified/added).
## Why was this MR needed?
To allow reserved HTML characters in a milestone's title, such as "PHP migration 5.6 -> 7.0". The text appears in 'milestones' and in a dropdown during issue creation, issue list, and in another dropdown for issue filter.
Closes #22452
See merge request !6533
|
|
Closes todos for a merge request when the MR is accepted via the API by the MR assignee.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Please review refresh service test changes to see if they are correct - I think in those cases, the todos should actually be cleared instead of left pending.
## Why was this MR needed?
To make the API behavior consistent with the UI behavior (accepting your own MRs closes the todo item and prevents them from piling up).
Closes #22477
See merge request !6486
|
|
New `AccessRequestsFinder`
Part of #21979.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] API support added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !6268
|
|
in db as unescaped.
Updating test value for milestone title
Adding API test for title with reserved HTML characters.
Updating changelog
Adding the MR number for fixing bug #22452.
removing duplicate line
Updating MR number.
|
|
|
|
Fix broken repo errors in the UI
This should prevent repo errors (or 404s) in the UI, together with https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab_git/merge_requests/124
The `exists?` cache is now expired if the repo gets broken.
Related MR: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab_git/merge_requests/124
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/20501
See merge request !6491
|
|
This will allow the Koding app to enable the integration itself once is has authorized an admin user using the application secrets.
|
|
Fix grammar and typos in Runners pages
_Originally opened at !1791 by @axil._
- - -
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !6547
|
|
|
|
Expose project share expiration_date field on API
closes #22382
See merge request !6484
|
|
Upgrade Devise from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0.
This fixes an issue with Rails 5 and brings us up-to-date with the latest Devise release. It also deprecates `Devise::TestHelpers` in favor of `Devise::Test::ControllerHelpers`.
Changelog: https://github.com/plataformatec/devise/blob/v4.2.0/CHANGELOG.md#420---2016-07-01
Working toward #14286, as always.
See merge request !6461
|
|
Expose pipeline data in builds API
Exposes pipeline data in builds API, as suggested by #22367.
The fields exposed were 'id', 'status', 'ref', and 'sha'.
Closes #22367
See merge request !6502
|
|
add pipeline ref, sha, and status to the build API response
add tests of build API (pipeline data)
change API documentation for builds API
log change to builds API in CHANGELOG
CHANGELOG: add reference to pull request and contributor's name
|
|
'18297-i-would-like-text-to-wrap-when-in-edit-mode-on-web-app' into 'master'"
This reverts merge request !6188
|
|
Do not regenerate the `lfs_token` every time `git-lfs-authenticate` is called
## What does this MR do?
Do not regenerate the `lfs_token` every time `git-lfs-authenticate` is called, instead return the saved token if one is present.
This was causing a lot of 401s, leading to 403s, as state in #22527
As it turns out, when pushing a lot of LFS objects, the LFS client was calling `git-lfs-authenticate` in the middle of the request again. This caused the `lfs_token` to be regenerated. The problem lies in that the LFS client was not aware of this change, and was still using the old token. This caused all subsequent requests to fail with a 401 error.
Since HTTP Auth is protected by Rack Attack, this 401s where immediately flagged and resulted in the IP of the user being banned.
With this change, GitLab returns the value stored in Redis, if one is present, thus if the LFS client calls `git-lfs-authenticate` again during the request, the auth header will remain unchanged, allowing all subsequent requests to continue without issues.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes #22527
cc @SeanPackham @jacobvosmaer-gitlab
See merge request !6551
|
|
Redis connection.
Reset expiry time of token, if token is retrieved again before it expires.
|
|
'22592-can-set-due-date-through-slash-commands-even-though-i-m-not-authorized-to' into 'master'
Fix permission for setting an issue's due date
## What does this MR do?
This merge request ensure the current user can `:admin_issue` in order to change the issue's `due_date`, in `BaseIssuableService` and in `SlashCommands::InterpretService`.
Closes #22592
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
No.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !6539
|
|
Added tests
Added awesomeeeeee icons
|
|
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
|
'master'
Added git http requests tests for user with LDAP identity
## What does this MR do?
Added tests to git http request for a user with ldap identity.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
In order to stick to the way the existing tests are defined in spec files, I have added the new tests in the same spec file that coveres the git http request feature and thus it seems to be a lot of changes in the git_http_spec.rb when looking at the commit git in Gitlab, but the largest change is indentation so please check with a better diff tool (i.e. kdiff3).
Let me know if this is OK with you or do you want to have a new file introduced (i.e. `git_http_ldap_spec.rb`)
## Why was this MR needed?
To increase test coverage and to make sure the changes that will be introduced by #20820 will not introduce any regressions.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#20820
See merge request !6559
|
|
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Roger Meier <r.meier@siemens.com>
|
|
|
|
This fixes an issue with Rails 5 and brings us up-to-date with the latest Devise release.
This also replaces the deprecated Devise::TestHelpers with Devise::Test::ControllerHelpers.
Changelog: https://github.com/plataformatec/devise/blob/v4.2.0/CHANGELOG.md#420---2016-07-01
|
|
Send ajax request for label update only if they are changed
## What does this MR do?
At the moment we send requests to update the labels on issue even if nothing has been changed. This fixes that and only sends requests when something has actually been changed.
The code gets the initial selected values based on the inputs & then compares that to the selected values when submitting. If they are equal, then no request is sent.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #19472
See merge request !5071
|
|
|
|
* No need to re-fetch issues from GH to read their labels, the labels
are already there from the index request.
* No need to look up labels on the database for every application, so we
cache them.
|
|
This should avoid having large memory growth when importing GitHub repos
with lots of resources.
|
|
called, instead return the saved token if one is present.
|
|
Add more tests for calendar contribution
## What does this MR do?
Add more tests for calendar contribution
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Shouldn't be
## Why was this MR needed?
Improve test coverage for calendar
## Screenshots (if relevant)
None
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #22347
See merge request !6421
|
|
|
