From 491783d8040f1f943c6fdd803ba0f1453dd074bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: GitLab Bot Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 00:11:23 +0000 Subject: Add latest changes from gitlab-org/gitlab@master --- doc/development/development_processes.md | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'doc/development/development_processes.md') diff --git a/doc/development/development_processes.md b/doc/development/development_processes.md index 27ebe98bc63..5035790f713 100644 --- a/doc/development/development_processes.md +++ b/doc/development/development_processes.md @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ --- stage: none group: Development -info: "See the Technical Writers assigned to Development Guidelines: https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/technical-writing/#assignments-to-development-guidelines" +info: "See the Technical Writers assigned to Development Guidelines: https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/ux/technical-writing/#assignments-to-development-guidelines" --- # Development processes @@ -56,10 +56,10 @@ group. For example, if you're documenting a new internal API used exclusively by a given group, request an engineering review from one of the group's members. After the engineering review is complete, assign the MR to the -[Technical Writer associated with the stage and group](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/technical-writing/#assignments) +[Technical Writer associated with the stage and group](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/ux/technical-writing/#assignments) in the modified documentation page's metadata. If the page is not assigned to a specific group, follow the -[Technical Writing review process for development guidelines](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/technical-writing/#assignments-to-development-guidelines). +[Technical Writing review process for development guidelines](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/ux/technical-writing/#assignments-to-development-guidelines). #### Broader changes @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ In these cases, use the following workflow: - [Quality](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/) - [Engineering Productivity](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/engineering-productivity/) - [Infrastructure](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/infrastructure/) - - [Technical Writing](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/technical-writing/) + - [Technical Writing](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/ux/technical-writing/) You can skip this step for MRs authored by EMs or Staff Engineers responsible for their area. @@ -100,10 +100,10 @@ In these cases, use the following workflow: @clefelhocz1. 1. After all approvals are complete, assign the MR to the - [Technical Writer associated with the stage and group](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/technical-writing/#assignments) + [Technical Writer associated with the stage and group](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/ux/technical-writing/#assignments) in the modified documentation page's metadata. If the page is not assigned to a specific group, follow the - [Technical Writing review process for development guidelines](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/technical-writing/#assignments-to-development-guidelines). + [Technical Writing review process for development guidelines](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/ux/technical-writing/#assignments-to-development-guidelines). The Technical Writer may ask for additional approvals as previously suggested before merging the MR. ### Reviewer values -- cgit v1.2.3