1 files changed, 0 insertions, 91 deletions
diff --git a/newlib/libc/stdlib/rand.c b/newlib/libc/stdlib/rand.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 131e5cf09..000000000
--- a/newlib/libc/stdlib/rand.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,91 +0,0 @@
-/*
-FUNCTION
-<<rand>>, <<srand>>---pseudo-random numbers
-
-INDEX
-	rand
-INDEX
-	srand
-INDEX
-	rand_r
-
-ANSI_SYNOPSIS
-	#include <stdlib.h>
-	int rand(void);
-	void srand(unsigned int <[seed]>);
-	int rand_r(unsigned int *<[seed]>);
-
-TRAD_SYNOPSIS
-	#include <stdlib.h>
-	int rand();
-
-	void srand(<[seed]>)
-	unsigned int <[seed]>;
-
-	void rand_r(<[seed]>)
-	unsigned int *<[seed]>;
-
-
-DESCRIPTION
-<<rand>> returns a different integer each time it is called; each
-integer is chosen by an algorithm designed to be unpredictable, so
-that you can use <<rand>> when you require a random number.
-The algorithm depends on a static variable called the ``random seed'';
-starting with a given value of the random seed always produces the
-same sequence of numbers in successive calls to <<rand>>.
-
-You can set the random seed using <<srand>>; it does nothing beyond
-storing its argument in the static variable used by <<rand>>.  You can
-exploit this to make the pseudo-random sequence less predictable, if
-you wish, by using some other unpredictable value (often the least
-significant parts of a time-varying value) as the random seed before
-beginning a sequence of calls to <<rand>>; or, if you wish to ensure
-(for example, while debugging) that successive runs of your program
-use the same ``random'' numbers, you can use <<srand>> to set the same
-random seed at the outset.
-
-RETURNS
-<<rand>> returns the next pseudo-random integer in sequence; it is a
-number between <<0>> and <<RAND_MAX>> (inclusive).
-
-<<srand>> does not return a result.
-
-NOTES
-<<rand>> and <<srand>> are unsafe for multi-threaded applications.
-<<rand_r>> is thread-safe and should be used instead.
-
-
-PORTABILITY
-<<rand>> is required by ANSI, but the algorithm for pseudo-random
-number generation is not specified; therefore, even if you use
-the same random seed, you cannot expect the same sequence of results
-on two different systems.
-
-<<rand>> requires no supporting OS subroutines.
-*/
-
-#ifndef _REENT_ONLY
-
-#include <stdlib.h>
-#include <reent.h>
-
-void
-_DEFUN (srand, (seed), unsigned int seed)
-{
-  _REENT_CHECK_RAND48(_REENT);
-  _REENT_RAND_NEXT(_REENT) = seed;
-}
-
-int
-_DEFUN_VOID (rand)
-{
-  /* This multiplier was obtained from Knuth, D.E., "The Art of
-     Computer Programming," Vol 2, Seminumerical Algorithms, Third
-     Edition, Addison-Wesley, 1998, p. 106 (line 26) & p. 108 */
-  _REENT_CHECK_RAND48(_REENT);
-  _REENT_RAND_NEXT(_REENT) = 
-     _REENT_RAND_NEXT(_REENT) * __extension__ 6364136223846793005LL + 1;
-  return (int)((_REENT_RAND_NEXT(_REENT) >> 32) & RAND_MAX);
-}
-
-#endif /* _REENT_ONLY */