Welcome to mirror list, hosted at ThFree Co, Russian Federation.

git.blender.org/blender.git - Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.
summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSybren A. Stüvel <sybren@blender.org>2020-06-18 11:37:52 +0300
committerSybren A. Stüvel <sybren@blender.org>2020-06-18 11:37:52 +0300
commita5e176a8ed8a40216cf264f465c636b939912702 (patch)
tree44701bc7248477975a4f73b1f987d42191b544e6
parent46e4cdf7884f997f8a2c9c8b06429fd8da917f2a (diff)
Allow interpolation of matrices with negative scale / axis flips
The matrix interpolation function `interp_m3_m3m3()` decomposes the matrices into rotation and scale matrices, converts the rotation matrices to quaternions, SLERPs the quaternions, and converts the result back to a matrix. Since quaternions cannot represent axis flips, this results in interpolation problems like described in T77154. Our interpolation function is based on "Matrix Animation and Polar Decomposition", by Ken Shoemake & Tom Duff. The paper states that it produces invalid results when there is an axis flip in the rotation matrix (or negative determinant, or negative scale, those all indicate the same thing). Their solution is to multiply the rotation matrix with `-I`, where `I` is the identity matrix. This is the same as element-wise multiplication with `-1.0f`. My proposed solution is to not only do that with the rotation matrix `R`, but also with the scale matrix `S`. This ensures that the decomposition of `A = R * S` remains valid, while also making it possible to conver the rotation component to a quaternion. There is still an issue when interpolating between matrices with different determinant. As the determinant represents the change in volume when that matrix is applied to an object, interpolating between a negative and a positive matrix will have to go through a zero determinant. In this case the volume collapses to zero. I don't see this as a big issue, though, as without this patch Blender would also produce invalid results anyway. Reviewed By: brecht, sergey Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D8048
-rw-r--r--source/blender/blenlib/intern/math_matrix.c16
-rw-r--r--tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_math_matrix_test.cc40
2 files changed, 47 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/source/blender/blenlib/intern/math_matrix.c b/source/blender/blenlib/intern/math_matrix.c
index 9e398239bc7..bc06882b67a 100644
--- a/source/blender/blenlib/intern/math_matrix.c
+++ b/source/blender/blenlib/intern/math_matrix.c
@@ -2388,6 +2388,22 @@ void interp_m3_m3m3(float R[3][3], const float A[3][3], const float B[3][3], con
mat3_polar_decompose(A, U_A, P_A);
mat3_polar_decompose(B, U_B, P_B);
+ /* Quaterions cannot represent an axis flip. If such a singularity is detected, choose a
+ * different decomposition of the matrix that still satisfies A = U_A * P_A but which has a
+ * positive determinant and thus no axis flips. This resolves T77154.
+ *
+ * Note that a flip of two axes is just a rotation of 180 degrees around the third axis, and
+ * three flipped axes are just an 180 degree rotation + a single axis flip. It is thus sufficient
+ * to solve this problem for single axis flips. */
+ if (determinant_m3_array(U_A) < 0) {
+ mul_m3_fl(U_A, -1.0f);
+ mul_m3_fl(P_A, -1.0f);
+ }
+ if (determinant_m3_array(U_B) < 0) {
+ mul_m3_fl(U_B, -1.0f);
+ mul_m3_fl(P_B, -1.0f);
+ }
+
mat3_to_quat(quat_A, U_A);
mat3_to_quat(quat_B, U_B);
interp_qt_qtqt(quat, quat_A, quat_B, t);
diff --git a/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_math_matrix_test.cc b/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_math_matrix_test.cc
index 0baccf9ee60..9c47c02ceaf 100644
--- a/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_math_matrix_test.cc
+++ b/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_math_matrix_test.cc
@@ -62,16 +62,38 @@ TEST(math_matrix, interp_m3_m3m3_singularity)
transpose_m3(matrix_a);
EXPECT_NEAR(-1.0f, determinant_m3_array(matrix_a), 1e-6);
- float matrix_i[3][3];
- unit_m3(matrix_i);
+ /* This matrix represents R=(0, 0, 0), S=(-1, 0, 0) */
+ float matrix_b[3][3] = {
+ {-1.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f},
+ {0.0f, 1.0f, 0.0f},
+ {0.0f, 0.0f, 1.0f},
+ };
+ transpose_m3(matrix_b);
float result[3][3];
- const float epsilon = 1e-6;
- interp_m3_m3m3(result, matrix_i, matrix_a, 0.0f);
- EXPECT_M3_NEAR(result, matrix_i, epsilon);
+ interp_m3_m3m3(result, matrix_a, matrix_b, 0.0f);
+ EXPECT_M3_NEAR(result, matrix_a, 1e-5);
+
+ interp_m3_m3m3(result, matrix_a, matrix_b, 1.0f);
+ EXPECT_M3_NEAR(result, matrix_b, 1e-5);
- /* This fails for matrices with a negative determinant, i.e. with an axis mirror in the rotation
- * component. See T77154. */
- // interp_m3_m3m3(result, matrix_i, matrix_a, 1.0f);
- // EXPECT_M3_NEAR(result, matrix_a, epsilon);
+ interp_m3_m3m3(result, matrix_a, matrix_b, 0.5f);
+ float expect[3][3] = {
+ {-0.997681f, -0.049995f, 0.046186f},
+ {-0.051473f, 0.998181f, -0.031385f},
+ {0.044533f, 0.033689f, 0.998440f},
+ };
+ transpose_m3(expect);
+ EXPECT_M3_NEAR(result, expect, 1e-5);
+
+ /* Interpolating between a matrix with and without axis flip can cause it to go through a zero
+ * point. The determinant det(A) of a matrix represents the change in volume; interpolating
+ * between matrices with det(A)=-1 and det(B)=1 will have to go through a point where
+ * det(result)=0, so where the volume becomes zero. */
+ float matrix_i[3][3];
+ unit_m3(matrix_i);
+ zero_m3(expect);
+ interp_m3_m3m3(result, matrix_a, matrix_i, 0.5f);
+ EXPECT_NEAR(0.0f, determinant_m3_array(result), 1e-5);
+ EXPECT_M3_NEAR(result, expect, 1e-5);
}