Fix for [#34898] Typo in error message of mathutils.Vector

* Also fixed some more cases of "more then" -> "more than". 

5 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/source/blender/bmesh/bmesh.h b/source/blender/bmesh/bmesh.h
index 3b33513b575..cfd30f29541 100644
--- a/source/blender/bmesh/bmesh.h
+++ b/source/blender/bmesh/bmesh.h
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
  * Edges and Vertices in BMesh are much like their counterparts in EditMesh,
  * except for some members private to the BMesh api.
  *
- * \note There can be more then one edge between two vertices in bmesh,
+ * \note There can be more than one edge between two vertices in bmesh,
  * though the rest of blender (e.g. DerivedMesh, CDDM, CCGSubSurf, etc) does not support this.
  *
  *
diff --git a/source/blender/bmesh/intern/bmesh_construct.c b/source/blender/bmesh/intern/bmesh_construct.c
index 5599dd6bc28..a216e762401 100644
--- a/source/blender/bmesh/intern/bmesh_construct.c
+++ b/source/blender/bmesh/intern/bmesh_construct.c
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ BMFace *BM_face_create_ngon(BMesh *bm, BMVert *v1, BMVert *v2, BMEdge **edges, c
 		verts_sort[vsort_index++] = v;
 		edges_sort[esort_index++] = e;
 
-		/* we only flag the verts to check if they are in the face more then once */
+		/* we only flag the verts to check if they are in the face more than once */
 		BM_ELEM_API_FLAG_ENABLE(v, _FLAG_MV);
 
 		do {
@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ BMFace *BM_face_create_ngon(BMesh *bm, BMVert *v1, BMVert *v2, BMEdge **edges, c
 			goto err;
 		}
 
-		/* check if vert is in face more then once. if the flag is disabled. we've already visited */
+		/* check if vert is in face more than once. if the flag is disabled. we've already visited */
 		if (UNLIKELY(!BM_ELEM_API_FLAG_TEST(verts_sort[i], _FLAG_MV))) {
 			goto err;
 		}
diff --git a/source/blender/bmesh/operators/bmo_dissolve.c b/source/blender/bmesh/operators/bmo_dissolve.c
index 13d706d8eed..e2a3cf025aa 100644
--- a/source/blender/bmesh/operators/bmo_dissolve.c
+++ b/source/blender/bmesh/operators/bmo_dissolve.c
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ void bmo_dissolve_edgeloop_exec(BMesh *bm, BMOperator *op)
 			BMO_elem_flag_enable(bm, e->v1, VERT_MARK);
 			BMO_elem_flag_enable(bm, e->v2, VERT_MARK);
 
-			/* BMESH_TODO - check on delaying edge removal since we may end up removing more then
+			/* BMESH_TODO - check on delaying edge removal since we may end up removing more than
 			 * one edge, and later reference a removed edge */
 			f_new = BM_faces_join_pair(bm, fa, fb, e, true);
 
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ void bmo_dissolve_edges_exec(BMesh *bm, BMOperator *op)
 
 			/* join faces */
 
-			/* BMESH_TODO - check on delaying edge removal since we may end up removing more then
+			/* BMESH_TODO - check on delaying edge removal since we may end up removing more than
 			 * one edge, and later reference a removed edge */
 			f_new = BM_faces_join_pair(bm, fa, fb, e, true);
 
diff --git a/source/blender/bmesh/operators/bmo_inset.c b/source/blender/bmesh/operators/bmo_inset.c
index d58894d7a1c..c99e6060a50 100644
--- a/source/blender/bmesh/operators/bmo_inset.c
+++ b/source/blender/bmesh/operators/bmo_inset.c
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ static BMLoop *bm_edge_is_mixed_face_tag(BMLoop *l)
 		l_iter = l;
 		do {
 			if (BM_elem_flag_test(l_iter->f, BM_ELEM_TAG)) {
-				/* more then one tagged face - bail out early! */
+				/* more than one tagged face - bail out early! */
 				if (tot_tag == 1) {
 					return NULL;
 				}
diff --git a/source/blender/bmesh/operators/bmo_subdivide.c b/source/blender/bmesh/operators/bmo_subdivide.c
index 32c5385bee6..aaa2914e6ae 100644
--- a/source/blender/bmesh/operators/bmo_subdivide.c
+++ b/source/blender/bmesh/operators/bmo_subdivide.c
@@ -1034,7 +1034,7 @@ void bmo_subdivide_edges_exec(BMesh *bm, BMOperator *op)
 				bool ok = true;
 
 				/* Check for special case: [#32500]
-				 * This edge pair could be used by more then one face,
+				 * This edge pair could be used by more than one face,
 				 * in this case it used to (2.63), split both faces along the same verts
 				 * while it could be calculated which face should do the split,
 				 * it's ambiguous, so in this case we're better off to skip them as exceptional cases