diff options
author | Campbell Barton <ideasman42@gmail.com> | 2020-03-19 04:05:34 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Campbell Barton <ideasman42@gmail.com> | 2020-03-19 04:09:07 +0300 |
commit | ed4c47632fd6c43aa9284e9ae9bcb77a7ec2ec82 (patch) | |
tree | eee61d8bf6e0803fdb194ff072e78ab1e546d443 /source/blender/editors/undo/memfile_undo.c | |
parent | 5bf09bbcdf5f9c476cec1f56de21d5e100e5b369 (diff) |
Cleanup: spelling
Diffstat (limited to 'source/blender/editors/undo/memfile_undo.c')
-rw-r--r-- | source/blender/editors/undo/memfile_undo.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/source/blender/editors/undo/memfile_undo.c b/source/blender/editors/undo/memfile_undo.c index 1ac4c031c8e..f9235938eb7 100644 --- a/source/blender/editors/undo/memfile_undo.c +++ b/source/blender/editors/undo/memfile_undo.c @@ -156,15 +156,15 @@ static void memfile_undosys_step_decode(struct bContext *C, * The only time we should have to force a complete redo is when current step is tagged as a * redo barrier. * If previous step was not a memfile one should not matter here, current data in old bmain - * should still always be valid for unchanged datat-blocks. */ + * should still always be valid for unchanged data-blocks. */ if (us_p->use_old_bmain_data == false) { use_old_bmain_data = false; } } else { /* Undo case. - * Here we do not care whether current step is an undo barrier, since we are comming from 'the - * future' we can still re-use old data. However, if *next* undo step + * Here we do not care whether current step is an undo barrier, since we are coming from + * 'the future' we can still re-use old data. However, if *next* undo step * (i.e. the one immediately in the future, the one we are coming from) * is a barrier, then we have to force a complete undo. * Note that non-memfile undo steps **should** not be an issue anymore, since we handle |