style cleanup

1 files changed, 30 insertions, 33 deletions

diff --git a/source/gameengine/GameLogic/SCA_RandomActuator.cpp b/source/gameengine/GameLogic/SCA_RandomActuator.cpp
index 9a54c76ed4e..2d51a45fe55 100644
--- a/source/gameengine/GameLogic/SCA_RandomActuator.cpp
+++ b/source/gameengine/GameLogic/SCA_RandomActuator.cpp
@@ -48,13 +48,13 @@
 /* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
 
 SCA_RandomActuator::SCA_RandomActuator(SCA_IObject *gameobj, 
-									 long seed,
-									 SCA_RandomActuator::KX_RANDOMACT_MODE mode,
-									 float para1,
-									 float para2,
-									 const STR_String &propName)
-	: SCA_IActuator(gameobj, KX_ACT_RANDOM),
-	  m_propname(propName),
+                                       long seed,
+                                       SCA_RandomActuator::KX_RANDOMACT_MODE mode,
+                                       float para1,
+                                       float para2,
+                                       const STR_String &propName)
+    : SCA_IActuator(gameobj, KX_ACT_RANDOM),
+      m_propname(propName),
 	  m_parameter1(para1),
 	  m_parameter2(para2),
 	  m_distribution(mode)
@@ -196,33 +196,30 @@ bool SCA_RandomActuator::Update()
 
 			 */
 			tmpval = new CFloatValue(m_parameter1);
-		} else {
-			/*
-
-			  070301 - nzc 
-			  Now, with seed != 0, we will most assuredly get some
-			  sensible values. The termination condition states two 
-			  things: 
-			  1. s >= 0 is not allowed: to prevent the distro from 
-				 getting a bias towards high values. This is a small
-				 correction, really, and might also be left out.
-			  2. s == 0 is not allowed: to prevent a division by zero
-				 when renormalising the drawn value to the desired
-				 distribution shape. As a side effect, the distro will
-				 never yield the exact mean. 
-			  I am not sure whether this is consistent, since the error 
-			  cause by #2 is of the same magnitude as the one 
-			  prevented by #1. The error introduced into the SD will be 
-			  improved, though. By how much? Hard to say... If you like
-			  the maths, feel free to analyse. Be aware that this is 
-			  one of the really old standard algorithms. I think the 
-			  original came in Fortran, was translated to Pascal, and 
-			  then someone came up with the C code. My guess it that
-			  this will be quite sufficient here.
-
+		}
+		else {
+			/* 070301 - nzc
+			 * Now, with seed != 0, we will most assuredly get some
+			 * sensible values. The termination condition states two
+			 * things:
+			 * 1. s >= 0 is not allowed: to prevent the distro from
+			 *    getting a bias towards high values. This is a small
+			 *    correction, really, and might also be left out.
+			 * 2. s == 0 is not allowed: to prevent a division by zero
+			 *    when renormalising the drawn value to the desired
+			 *    distribution shape. As a side effect, the distro will
+			 *    never yield the exact mean.
+			 * I am not sure whether this is consistent, since the error
+			 * cause by #2 is of the same magnitude as the one
+			 * prevented by #1. The error introduced into the SD will be
+			 * improved, though. By how much? Hard to say... If you like
+			 * the maths, feel free to analyse. Be aware that this is
+			 * one of the really old standard algorithms. I think the
+			 * original came in Fortran, was translated to Pascal, and
+			 * then someone came up with the C code. My guess it that
+			 * this will be quite sufficient here.
 			 */
-			do 
-			{
+			do {
 				x = 2.0 * m_base->DrawFloat() - 1.0;
 				y = 2.0 * m_base->DrawFloat() - 1.0;
 				s = x*x + y*y;