Welcome to mirror list, hosted at ThFree Co, Russian Federation.

git.blender.org/blender.git - Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.
summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tests
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorCampbell Barton <ideasman42@gmail.com>2019-04-20 11:06:01 +0300
committerCampbell Barton <ideasman42@gmail.com>2019-04-20 11:08:59 +0300
commite17e119a312528897d2b1f0ee73a9a8a6ecf6150 (patch)
treea61cdcc1d5682f5bd462d542efc09e7ef21311ca /tests
parente63eb6ed2696c5d52b35972ab7a1bbda7b5bdc90 (diff)
Cleanup: comment line length (tests)
Diffstat (limited to 'tests')
-rw-r--r--tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_ghash_performance_test.cc11
-rw-r--r--tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_ghash_test.cc10
-rw-r--r--tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_hash_mm2a_test.cc5
-rw-r--r--tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_math_base_test.cc8
-rw-r--r--tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_string_test.cc3
-rw-r--r--tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_string_utf8_test.cc6
-rw-r--r--tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_task_test.cc3
7 files changed, 29 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_ghash_performance_test.cc b/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_ghash_performance_test.cc
index b7a6e16e42a..ba995e5014f 100644
--- a/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_ghash_performance_test.cc
+++ b/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_ghash_performance_test.cc
@@ -15,8 +15,12 @@ extern "C" {
}
/* Using http://corpora.uni-leipzig.de/downloads/eng_wikipedia_2010_1M-text.tar.gz
- * (1 million of words, about 122MB of text) from http://corpora.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/download.html */
-//#define TEXT_CORPUS_PATH "/path/to/Téléchargements/eng_wikipedia_2010_1M-text/eng_wikipedia_2010_1M-sentences.txt"
+ * (1 million of words, about 122MB of text) from
+ * http://corpora.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/download.html */
+#if 0
+# define TEXT_CORPUS_PATH \
+ "/path/to/Téléchargements/eng_wikipedia_2010_1M-text/eng_wikipedia_2010_1M-sentences.txt"
+#endif
/* Resizing the hash has a huge cost over global filling operation! */
//#define GHASH_RESERVE
@@ -459,7 +463,8 @@ TEST(ghash, Int4Murmur2a20000000)
}
#endif
-/* MultiSmall: create and manipulate a lot of very small ghashes (90% < 10 items, 9% < 100 items, 1% < 1000 items). */
+/* MultiSmall: create and manipulate a lot of very small ghashes
+ * (90% < 10 items, 9% < 100 items, 1% < 1000 items). */
static void multi_small_ghash_tests_one(GHash *ghash, RNG *rng, const unsigned int nbr)
{
diff --git a/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_ghash_test.cc b/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_ghash_test.cc
index c2ef064c8c9..d6841ad4d44 100644
--- a/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_ghash_test.cc
+++ b/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_ghash_test.cc
@@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ extern "C" {
} \
void(0)
-/* Note: for pure-ghash testing, nature of the keys and data have absolutely no importance! So here we just use mere
- * random integers stored in pointers. */
+/* Note: for pure-ghash testing, nature of the keys and data have absolutely no importance! So here
+ * we just use mere random integers stored in pointers. */
static void init_keys(unsigned int keys[TESTCASE_SIZE], const int seed)
{
@@ -58,7 +58,8 @@ static void init_keys(unsigned int keys[TESTCASE_SIZE], const int seed)
BLI_rng_free(rng);
}
-/* Here we simply insert and then lookup all keys, ensuring we do get back the expected stored 'data'. */
+/* Here we simply insert and then lookup all keys, ensuring we do get back the expected stored
+ * 'data'. */
TEST(ghash, InsertLookup)
{
GHash *ghash = BLI_ghash_new(BLI_ghashutil_inthash_p, BLI_ghashutil_intcmp, __func__);
@@ -81,7 +82,8 @@ TEST(ghash, InsertLookup)
BLI_ghash_free(ghash, NULL, NULL);
}
-/* Here we simply insert and then remove all keys, ensuring we do get an empty, unshrinked ghash. */
+/* Here we simply insert and then remove all keys, ensuring we do get an empty, unshrinked ghash.
+ */
TEST(ghash, InsertRemove)
{
GHash *ghash = BLI_ghash_new(BLI_ghashutil_inthash_p, BLI_ghashutil_intcmp, __func__);
diff --git a/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_hash_mm2a_test.cc b/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_hash_mm2a_test.cc
index 16a2db6af56..4f6570d93ad 100644
--- a/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_hash_mm2a_test.cc
+++ b/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_hash_mm2a_test.cc
@@ -6,8 +6,9 @@ extern "C" {
#include "BLI_hash_mm2a.h"
}
-/* Note: Reference results are taken from reference implementation (cpp code, CMurmurHash2A variant):
- * https://smhasher.googlecode.com/svn-history/r130/trunk/MurmurHash2.cpp
+/* Note: Reference results are taken from reference implementation
+ * (cpp code, CMurmurHash2A variant):
+ * https://smhasher.googlecode.com/svn-history/r130/trunk/MurmurHash2.cpp
*/
TEST(hash_mm2a, MM2ABasic)
diff --git a/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_math_base_test.cc b/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_math_base_test.cc
index 89903e1759c..d62d0ba274d 100644
--- a/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_math_base_test.cc
+++ b/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_math_base_test.cc
@@ -4,7 +4,8 @@
#include "BLI_math.h"
-/* In tests below, when we are using -1.0f as max_diff value, we actually turn the function into a pure-ULP one. */
+/* In tests below, when we are using -1.0f as max_diff value, we actually turn the function into a
+ * pure-ULP one. */
/* Put this here, since we cannot use BLI_assert() in inline math files it seems... */
TEST(math_base, CompareFFRelativeValid)
@@ -73,8 +74,9 @@ TEST(math_base, CompareFFRelativeZero)
/* Note: in theory, this should return false, since 0.0f and -0.0f have 0x80000000 diff,
* but overflow in subtraction seems to break something here
- * (abs(*(int *)&fn0 - *(int *)&f0) == 0x80000000 == fn0), probably because int32 cannot hold this abs value.
- * this is yet another illustration of why one shall never use (near-)zero floats in pure-ULP comparison. */
+ * (abs(*(int *)&fn0 - *(int *)&f0) == 0x80000000 == fn0), probably because int32 cannot
+ * hold this abs value. this is yet another illustration of why one shall never use (near-)zero
+ * floats in pure-ULP comparison. */
// EXPECT_FALSE(compare_ff_relative(fn0, f0, -1.0f, 1024));
// EXPECT_FALSE(compare_ff_relative(f0, fn0, -1.0f, 1024));
diff --git a/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_string_test.cc b/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_string_test.cc
index 8ce9a8c8f0a..bffd38016a7 100644
--- a/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_string_test.cc
+++ b/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_string_test.cc
@@ -320,7 +320,8 @@ TEST(string, StrPartitionExUtf8)
{
const char *str = "ma\xc3\xb1te-r\xe2\x98\xafial";
- /* "ma\xc3\xb1te-r\xe2\x98\xafial" over "ma\xc3\xb1te" -> "ma", '\xc3\xb1', "te-r\xe2\x98\xafial", 2 */
+ /* "ma\xc3\xb1te-r\xe2\x98\xafial" over
+ * "ma\xc3\xb1te" -> "ma", '\xc3\xb1', "te-r\xe2\x98\xafial", 2 */
pre_ln = BLI_str_partition_ex_utf8(str, str + 6, delim, &sep, &suf, true);
EXPECT_EQ(pre_ln, 2);
EXPECT_EQ(&str[2], sep);
diff --git a/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_string_utf8_test.cc b/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_string_utf8_test.cc
index 49d773c319e..01a9549044a 100644
--- a/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_string_utf8_test.cc
+++ b/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_string_utf8_test.cc
@@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ extern "C" {
#include "BLI_string_utf8.h"
}
-/* Note that 'common' utf-8 variants of string functions (like copy, etc.) are tested in BLI_string_test.cc
- * However, tests below are specific utf-8 conformance ones, and since they eat quite their share of lines,
- * they deserved their own file. */
+/* Note that 'common' utf-8 variants of string functions (like copy, etc.) are tested in
+ * BLI_string_test.cc However, tests below are specific utf-8 conformance ones, and since they eat
+ * quite their share of lines, they deserved their own file. */
/* -------------------------------------------------------------------- */
/* stubs */
diff --git a/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_task_test.cc b/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_task_test.cc
index 5979236b6ec..ed2fd60a3e9 100644
--- a/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_task_test.cc
+++ b/tests/gtests/blenlib/BLI_task_test.cc
@@ -66,7 +66,8 @@ TEST(task, MempoolIter)
BLI_task_parallel_mempool(mempool, &num_items, task_mempool_iter_func, true);
- /* Those checks should ensure us all items of the mempool were processed once, and only once - as expected. */
+ /* Those checks should ensure us all items of the mempool were processed once, and only once - as
+ * expected. */
EXPECT_EQ(num_items, 0);
for (i = 0; i < NUM_ITEMS; i++) {
if (data[i] != NULL) {