diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'source/blender/blenkernel/intern/node.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | source/blender/blenkernel/intern/node.c | 47 |
1 files changed, 27 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/source/blender/blenkernel/intern/node.c b/source/blender/blenkernel/intern/node.c index 3b46727c33f..b35e88f5036 100644 --- a/source/blender/blenkernel/intern/node.c +++ b/source/blender/blenkernel/intern/node.c @@ -126,8 +126,9 @@ static void node_init(const struct bContext *C, bNodeTree *ntree, bNode *node) /* initialize the node name with the node label. * note: do this after the initfunc so nodes get their data set which may be used in naming * (node groups for example) */ - /* XXX Do not use nodeLabel() here, it returns translated content for UI, which should *only* be used - * in UI, *never* in data... Data have their own translation option! + /* XXX Do not use nodeLabel() here, it returns translated content for UI, + * which should *only* be used in UI, *never* in data... + * Data have their own translation option! * This solution may be a bit rougher than nodeLabel()'s returned string, but it's simpler * than adding "do_translate" flags to this func (and labelfunc() as well). */ BLI_strncpy(node->name, DATA_(ntype->ui_name), NODE_MAXSTR); @@ -284,7 +285,8 @@ static void update_typeinfo(Main *bmain, } /* Try to initialize all typeinfo in a node tree. - * NB: In general undefined typeinfo is a perfectly valid case, the type may just be registered later. + * NB: In general undefined typeinfo is a perfectly valid case, + * the type may just be registered later. * In that case the update_typeinfo function will set typeinfo on registration * and do necessary updates. */ @@ -339,8 +341,8 @@ void ntreeTypeAdd(bNodeTreeType *nt) { BLI_ghash_insert(nodetreetypes_hash, nt->idname, nt); /* XXX pass Main to register function? */ - /* Probably not. It is pretty much expected we want to update G_MAIN her I think - or we'd want to update *all* - * active Mains, which we cannot do anyway currently. */ + /* Probably not. It is pretty much expected we want to update G_MAIN here I think - + * or we'd want to update *all* active Mains, which we cannot do anyway currently. */ update_typeinfo(G_MAIN, NULL, nt, NULL, NULL, false); } @@ -349,8 +351,8 @@ static void ntree_free_type(void *treetype_v) { bNodeTreeType *treetype = treetype_v; /* XXX pass Main to unregister function? */ - /* Probably not. It is pretty much expected we want to update G_MAIN her I think - or we'd want to update *all* - * active Mains, which we cannot do anyway currently. */ + /* Probably not. It is pretty much expected we want to update G_MAIN here I think - + * or we'd want to update *all* active Mains, which we cannot do anyway currently. */ update_typeinfo(G_MAIN, NULL, treetype, NULL, NULL, true); MEM_freeN(treetype); } @@ -401,8 +403,8 @@ static void node_free_type(void *nodetype_v) { bNodeType *nodetype = nodetype_v; /* XXX pass Main to unregister function? */ - /* Probably not. It is pretty much expected we want to update G_MAIN her I think - or we'd want to update *all* - * active Mains, which we cannot do anyway currently. */ + /* Probably not. It is pretty much expected we want to update G_MAIN here I think - + * or we'd want to update *all* active Mains, which we cannot do anyway currently. */ update_typeinfo(G_MAIN, NULL, NULL, nodetype, NULL, true); /* XXX deprecated */ @@ -423,8 +425,8 @@ void nodeRegisterType(bNodeType *nt) BLI_ghash_insert(nodetypes_hash, nt->idname, nt); /* XXX pass Main to register function? */ - /* Probably not. It is pretty much expected we want to update G_MAIN her I think - or we'd want to update *all* - * active Mains, which we cannot do anyway currently. */ + /* Probably not. It is pretty much expected we want to update G_MAIN here I think - + * or we'd want to update *all* active Mains, which we cannot do anyway currently. */ update_typeinfo(G_MAIN, NULL, NULL, nt, NULL, false); } @@ -462,8 +464,8 @@ static void node_free_socket_type(void *socktype_v) { bNodeSocketType *socktype = socktype_v; /* XXX pass Main to unregister function? */ - /* Probably not. It is pretty much expected we want to update G_MAIN her I think - or we'd want to update *all* - * active Mains, which we cannot do anyway currently. */ + /* Probably not. It is pretty much expected we want to update G_MAIN here I think - + * or we'd want to update *all* active Mains, which we cannot do anyway currently. */ update_typeinfo(G_MAIN, NULL, NULL, NULL, socktype, true); MEM_freeN(socktype); @@ -473,8 +475,8 @@ void nodeRegisterSocketType(bNodeSocketType *st) { BLI_ghash_insert(nodesockettypes_hash, (void *)st->idname, st); /* XXX pass Main to register function? */ - /* Probably not. It is pretty much expected we want to update G_MAIN her I think - or we'd want to update *all* - * active Mains, which we cannot do anyway currently. */ + /* Probably not. It is pretty much expected we want to update G_MAIN here I think - + * or we'd want to update *all* active Mains, which we cannot do anyway currently. */ update_typeinfo(G_MAIN, NULL, NULL, NULL, st, false); } @@ -931,7 +933,8 @@ void nodeChainIter(const bNodeTree *ntree, continue; } if (link->tonode && link->fromnode) { - /* is the link part of the chain meaning node_start == fromnode (or tonode for reversed case)? */ + /* Is the link part of the chain meaning node_start == fromnode + * (or tonode for reversed case)? */ if ((reversed && (link->tonode == node_start)) || (!reversed && link->fromnode == node_start)) { if (!callback(link->fromnode, link->tonode, userdata, reversed)) { @@ -945,7 +948,8 @@ void nodeChainIter(const bNodeTree *ntree, } /** - * Iterate over all parents of \a node, executing \a callback for each parent (which can return false to end iterator) + * Iterate over all parents of \a node, executing \a callback for each parent + * (which can return false to end iterator) * * \note Recursive */ @@ -1370,8 +1374,10 @@ bNodeTree *ntreeAddTree(Main *bmain, const char *name, const char *idname) } /** - * Only copy internal data of NodeTree ID from source to already allocated/initialized destination. - * You probably never want to use that directly, use BKE_id_copy or BKE_id_copy_ex for typical needs. + * Only copy internal data of NodeTree ID from source + * to already allocated/initialized destination. + * You probably never want to use that directly, + * use #BKE_id_copy or #BKE_id_copy_ex for typical needs. * * WARNING! This function will not handle ID user count! * @@ -1716,7 +1722,8 @@ void BKE_node_preview_merge_tree(bNodeTree *to_ntree, bNodeTree *from_ntree, boo BKE_node_instance_hash_insert(to_ntree->previews, key, preview); } - /* Note: NULL free function here, because pointers have already been moved over to to_ntree->previews! */ + /* Note: NULL free function here, + * because pointers have already been moved over to to_ntree->previews! */ BKE_node_instance_hash_free(from_ntree->previews, NULL); from_ntree->previews = NULL; } |