| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The RenderResult struct still has a listbase of RenderLayer, but that's ok
since this is strictly for rendering.
* Subversion bump (to 2.80.2)
* DNA low level doversion (renames) - only for .blend created since 2.80 started
Note: We can't use DNA_struct_elem_find or get file version in init_structDNA,
so we are manually iterating over the array of the SDNA elements instead.
Note 2: This doversion change with renames can be reverted in a few months. But
so far it's required for 2.8 files created between October 2016 and now.
Reviewers: campbellbarton, sergey
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2927
|
|
This patch moves all the functionality previously in SceneRenderLayer to SceneLayer.
If we want to rename some of these structs now would be a good time to do it, before they are in SceneLayer.
Everything should be working, though I will test things further tomorrow. Once this is committed depsgraph can get
rid of the workaround added in rna_Main_meshes_new_from_object and finish whatever this patch was preventing from being finished.
This patch also adds a few placeholders for the overrides (samples, ...). These are obviously not working, so some unittests that rely on 'lay', and 'zmask' will fail.
This patch does not addressed the change of moving samples to ViewRender (I have this as a separate patch and needs some separate discussion).
Following next is the individual note of the individual parts that were committed.
Note 1: It is up to Cycles to still get rid of exclude_layer internally.
Note 2: Cycles still need to handle its own doversion for the use_layer_samples cases and
(1) Remove the override as it is
(2) Add a new override (scene.cycles.samples) if scene.cycles.use_layer_samples != IGNORE
Respecting the expected behaviour when scene.cycles.use_layer_samples == BOUNDED.
Note 3: Cycles still need to implement the per-object holdout
(similar to how we do shadow catcher).
Note 4: There are parts of the old (Blender Internal) rendering pipeline that is still
using lay, e.g., in shi->lay.
Honestly it will be easier to purge the entire Blender Internal code away instead of taking things from it bit by bit.
Reviewers: sergey, campbellbarton, brecht
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2919
|
|
There are parts of the old (Blender Internal) rendering pipeline that is still
using lay, e.g., in shi->lay.
Honestly it will be easier to purge the entire Blender Internal code away instead
of taking things from it bit by bit.
|
|
Note: Cycles still need to implement the per-object holdout
(similar to how we do shadow catcher).
|
|
Note: Cycles still need to handle its own doversion for theses cases and
(1) Remove the override as it is
(2) Add a new override (scene.cycles.samples) if scene.cycles.use_layer_samples != IGNORE
Respecting the expected behaviour when scene.cycles.use_layer_samples == BOUNDED.
|
|
|
|
Note: It is up to Cycles to still get rid of exclude_layer internally:
RenderLayerInfo.exclude_layer
|
|
This is tricky since we may want granular polling depending on the setting.
Or an option to pick whether we want the context or the scene to drive the
panels to prevent too many panels when mixing Eevee and Cycles for example.
|
|
|
|
Reviewers: sergey, brecht
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2920
|
|
No color pass because it's hard to define what to use as color in a volume.
Reviewers: sergey, brecht
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2903
|
|
random_id() crashes when there is no current dupli object.
We could also throw a Python error when doing it via RNA, but as far as
Cycles is concerned we need to check if instanced.
|
|
Considerable non-trivial merge conflict fixes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The algorithm averages normals from nearby surfaces. It uses the same
sampling strategy as BSSRDFs, casting rays along the normal and two
orthogonal axes, and combining the samples with MIS.
The main concern here is that we are introducing raytracing inside
shader evaluation, which could be quite bad for GPU performance and
stack memory usage. In practice it doesn't seem so bad though.
Note that using this feature can easily slow down renders 20%, and
that if you care about performance then it's better to use a bevel
modifier. Mainly this is useful for baking, and for cases where the
mesh topology makes it difficult for the bevel modifier to work well.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Conflicts:
# tests/gtests/alembic/abc_export_test.cc
|
|
|
|
|
|
The idea is to make it possible to report extra meta data from
render engine to the file writing. This way we can provide
additional information such as number of samples rendered by
resumable Cycles rendering so we can easily combine files back.
Currently only report number of samples from Cycles when rendering
a single render-layer scene. This is something what was required
here at the studio. We can easily extend that further.
Ideally we would also need to support non-string metadata, but
that's for later.
Reviewers: mont29, campbellbarton
Reviewed By: mont29, campbellbarton
Subscribers: sybren, candreacchio
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2502
|
|
|
|
We are already using the AO distance, so might as well offer this extra
control over the intensity. Useful when an interior scene is supposed to
be significantly darker than the background shader.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Progressive refine undoes memory saving from save buffers, so enabling
both does not make much sense. Previously enabling progressive refine
would disable denoising, but it should be the other way around since
denoise actually affects the render result.
Includes some code refactor for progressive refine render buffers, and
avoids recomputing tiles for each progressive sample.
|
|
CPU rendering will be restricted to a BVH2, which is not ideal for raytracing
performance but can be shared with the GPU. Decoupled volume shading will be
disabled to match GPU volume sampling.
The number of CPU rendering threads is reduced to leave one core dedicated to
each GPU. Viewport rendering will also only use GPU rendering still. So along
with the BVH2 usage, perfect scaling should not be expected.
Go to User Preferences > System to enable the CPU to render alongside the GPU.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2873
|
|
Engine is not stored in WorkSpaces. That defines the "context" engine, which
is used for the entire UI.
The engine used for the poll of nodes (add node menu, new nodes when "Use Nodes")
is obtained from context.
Introduce a ViewRender struct for viewport settings that are defined for
workspaces and scene. This struct will be populated with the hand-picked
settings that can be defined per workspace as per the 2.8 design.
* use_scene_settings
* properties editor: workshop + organize context path
Use Scene Settings
==================
For viewport drawing, Workspaces have an option to use the Scene render
settings (F12) instead of the viewport settings.
This way users can quickly preview the final render settings, engine and
View Layer. This will affect all the editors in that workspace, and it will be
clearly indicated in the top-bar.
Properties Editor: Add Workspace and organize context path
==========================================================
We now have the properties of:
Scene, Scene > Layer, Scene > World, Workspace
[Scene | Workspace] > Render Layer > Object
[Scene | Workspace] > Render Layer > Object > Data
(...)
Reviewers: Campbell Barton, Julian Eisel
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2842
|
|
Conflicts:
source/blender/editors/screen/screen_edit.c
|
|
This patch goes away form using C++ RNA during tangent space calculation which
avoids quite a bit of overhead. Now all calculation is done using data which
already exists in ccl::Mesh. This means, tangent space is now calculated from
triangles, which doesn't seem to be any different (at least as far as regression
tests are concerned).
One of the positive sides is that this change makes it possible to move tangent
space calculation from blender/ to render/ so we will have Cycles standalone
supporting tangent space.
Reviewers: brecht, lukasstockner97, campbellbarton
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While cubic interpolation is quite expensive on the CPU compared to linear
interpolation, the difference on the GPU is quite small.
|
|
|
|
Regression since 9298c53.
|
|
|
|
Also skip any objects with zero ray visibility and meshes with
zero faces.
|
|
|
|
Iterate over invisible objects too, so lamps can still lit the scene.
Also, now you can use a collection to set an object to invisible, not
only to visible.
For example:
Scene > Master collection > bedroom > furniture
Scene > View Layer > bedroom (visible)
> furniture (invisible)
The View Layer has two linked collections, bedroom and furniture.
This setup will make the furniture collection invisible.
Note: Unlike what was suggested on D2849, this does not make collection
visibility influence camera visibility. I will keep this as a separate
patch.
Reviewers: sergey
Subscribers: sergey, brecht, fclem
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2849
|
|
|
|
|
|
The issue here was that removing datablock from main database will poke editors
update, which includes buttons context to free users of texture. Since Cycles
will free datablocks from job thread, it might crash Blender since main thread
might be in the middle of drawing.
Solved by exposing extra arguments to bpy.data.foo.remove() which indicates
whether we want to perform ID user count and interface updates. While scripts
shouldn't be using those normally, this is the only way to allow Cycles to skip
interface update when removing datablock.
Reviewers: mont29
Reviewed By: mont29
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2840
|
|
|
|
|
